The Roger Stone Trial

#827
#827
BowlBrother85 said:
Of course, you would.... and of course, I don't agree.
Click to expand...

The null hypothesis would be there is no difference between political ideologies on the issue. You are claiming that there is a difference yet you offer no evidence whatsoever. At least I offered an example supporting the null.

Where's your data?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
#830
#830
volinbham said:
The null hypothesis would be there is no difference between political ideologies on the issue. You are claiming that there is a difference yet you offer no evidence whatsoever. At least I offered an example supporting the null.
Click to expand...
My examples were given above and are exclusive to this forum. I didn't say that it was tied to an ideology or that liberals such as luther don't also do it... the conservatives here, tend to offer less substance and are more prone to playing identity politics and to using pejorative terms when addressing those who disagree with them. The examples I cited were: FLVOL69 (pretty much all of his posts), volfanjustin, hjeagle1vol and AirVol.... there are others, but that was who I mentioned.
 
#831
#831
BowlBrother85 said:
My examples were given above and are exclusive to this forum. I didn't say that it was tied to an ideology or that liberals such as luther don't also do it... the conservatives here, tend to offer less substance and are more prone to playing identity politics and to using pejorative terms when addressing those who disagree with them. The examples I cited were: FLVOL69 (pretty much all of his posts), volfanjustin, hjeagle1vol and AirVol.... there are others, but that was who I mentioned.
Click to expand...

**** off
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1, hjeagle1vol, BigOrangeD and 1 other person
#832
#832
BowlBrother85 said:
My examples were given above and are exclusive to this forum. I didn't say that it was tied to an ideology or that liberals such as luther don't also do it... the conservatives here, tend to offer less substance and are more prone to playing identity politics and to using pejorative terms when addressing those who disagree with them. The examples I cited were: FLVOL69 (pretty much all of his posts), volfanjustin, hjeagle1vol and AirVol.... there are others, but that was who I mentioned.
Click to expand...

Dude you’re so full of **** it’s coming out your mouth and your ears
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1 and BigOrangeD
#834
#834
BowlBrother85 said:
My examples were given above and are exclusive to this forum. I didn't say that it was tied to an ideology or that liberals such as luther don't also do it... the conservatives here, tend to offer less substance and are more prone to playing identity politics and to using pejorative terms when addressing those who disagree with them. The examples I cited were: FLVOL69 (pretty much all of his posts), volfanjustin, hjeagle1vol and AirVol.... there are others, but that was who I mentioned.
Click to expand...

Those aren't examples. They are generalized statements.

You are welcome to your opinion but if you want to pass it as fact then you'll need documentary evidence and not just your "feeling"
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood, 37L1 and BigOrangeD
#835
#835
volinbham said:
Not me. Maybe Flynn depending on what happens but not the others.
Click to expand...
The reason that I hope he does is because none would have been in trouble if they weren't tied to Trump. Plus, they didn't get into their trouble because of anything they did for Trump, and there never should have been a Special Prosecutor. I don't doubt that some are slimy characters, but D.C. is full of them running around free.
 
#839
#839
volinbham said:
Not me. Maybe Flynn depending on what happens but not the others.
Click to expand...
Not sure how I feel considering how selective they are in who they charge with lying to Congress. If it's a crime, why isn't it applied uniformly? Plenty of people have lied to Congress, but no where near all have been prosecuted. Why? It does come across as if bias is in play. While I think what Roger Stone did was wrong, why should he be singled out when others are aloud to skate? It makes no sense. I have no problem with him getting punished, but I want across the board fairness, and not selective prosecution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood, NCFisher and 37L1
#845
#845
BigOrangeD said:

Liberal Legal Scholar Jonathan Turley: Leftist Tomeka Hart ‘Had No Place’ on the Roger Stone Jury
Click to expand...

He's exactly correct. If she lied during jury selection - and there is ample evidence to suggest it - and posted about the case during trial, wouldn't it be delicious if mistrial is declared, and Ms. Hart actually got jail time?

I love mouthy, leftist SJWs.

Stone needs to fire his lawyers and sue them for every dollar paid them; it's absolute incompetence they didn't review her online presence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol, W.TN.Orange Blood, BigOrangeD and 1 other person
#846
#846
USAFgolferVol said:
You don't know what the word means or you wouldn't be saying it to someone who helped to provide the very freedom by which you live by
Click to expand...

I’m all about being thankful for the people who serve and served in the military for me , my family , and this country . I’ve gotta say though , you’ve bragged more about serving in the last couple of months than my uncle and grandfather did combined their entire lives , and they fought in Vietnam and ww2 . We get it , you are proud to have served but using it to tell others ( especially when you don’t know what they’ve been through ) that they don’t have a clue about something is just ridiculous. My grandfather use to have a saying about people that liked to talk about their time in the service and what they did ... he said “ they were usually the ones in the rear , with the gear “.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill, Rickyvol77, davethevol and 1 other person
#847
#847
0nelilreb said:
I’m all about being thankful for the people who serve and served in the military for me , my family , and this country . I’ve gotta say though , you’ve bragged more about serving in the last couple of months than my uncle and grandfather did combined their entire lives , and they fought in Vietnam and ww2 . We get it , you are proud to have served but using it to tell others ( especially when you don’t know what they’ve been through ) that they don’t have a clue about something is just ridiculous. My grandfather use to have a saying about people that liked to talk about their time in the service and what they did ... he said “ they were usually the ones in the rear , with the gear “.
Click to expand...
I haven't bragged about it and didn't then. Just stating facts. When people question your love of the country, sometimes they need to be better informed. Don't give a shat what your grandfather said. It doesn't apply here.
 
#849
#849
USAFgolferVol said:
I haven't bragged about it and didn't then. Just stating facts. When people question your love of the country, sometimes they need to be better informed. Don't give a shat what your grandfather said. It doesn't apply here.
Click to expand...

Tomatoes / Tomatoes... just saying , you sure do a lot of “stating them facts “.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top