FLVOL69
MAGA
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2010
- Messages
- 28,834
- Likes
- 51,694
I am sure you do.
If he does (and I suspect he will), it will be after the election. Pardons like that would make only the base happy. Although Trump is seemingly an expert in keeping his 33 %, giddy, while making ZERO effort to expand that base, I am sure that Barr and the others are hiding the pardon forms away from him right now, for fear he'd do a lot of stupid things with them if he knew where they kept them.
Ok. I agree in principle, but is there any evidence that witness intimidation is selectively prosecuted?I have no impact - just stating an opinion on why it's excessive.
The FBI knew it was BS and Congress knew it was BS.
It's not justice to exact revenge when your larger case falls to pieces. It's not justice prosecute some for lying to Congress but completely ignore others.
But I know you hate Trump so congrats
Ok. I agree in principle, but is there any evidence that witness intimidation is selectively prosecuted?
Ok, so can you give me a reason it's cool for Papa Droops Barr to step into this case? I had assumed you would give me a unitary executive argument, but maybe you know the absurd consequences that leads to when it comes to prosecutorial discretion.
Barr sees how the entire Trump/Collusion effort was flawed and how the FBI and Congress knew Stone wasn't colluding but still went after him hard to get something on him.
As head of DOJ his job it to be fair and since the investigation/prosecution was flawed he's trying to interject some sanity.
But, but I know - Orange Man Bad so let's nail Stone.