The Russia Hoax: The Illicit Scheme to Clear Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump

#254
#254
RockyTop85 said:
You know he was invited to give a statement to the FBI, wasn’t told he needed a lawyer, and wasn’t informed that lying to the FBI was a crime? Still want to hang his POS ass? send him to prison?
Click to expand...
He’s a lawyer. Look at his work resume to that point he’d been around federal LEO’s for considerable time. And he isn’t aware that lying to a federal LEO is a crime?

458241A6-9046-47F7-946C-270CF0DD6A6B.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#256
#256
RockyTop85 said:
No way! If we were talking about Flynn I would have had a bunch of replies outraged that this was done to somebody instead of people laughing it off.
Click to expand...

Good one....seemed too low hanging fruit and I bit the apple.
 
#258
#258
When American banks would not loan Trump money after his bankruptcy, he borrowed a few hundred million dollars from a German bank, with the loans underwritten by a Russian state bank. Every person who is too stupid to understand the control that gives Putin over Trump, say aye.
 
Last edited:
#259
#259
Vol Main said:
When American banks would not loan Trump money after his bankruptcy, he borrowed a few hundred million dollars from a German bank, with the loans underwritten by a Russian state bank. Every person who is too stupid to understand the control that gives Putin over Trump, say aye.
Click to expand...

let me guess - you spent thousands of hours on the research so if we ask for a link or evidence you'll tell us to do our own work and we should just believe you've got the story 100% correct.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40, BreatheUT, NEO and 3 others
#260
#260
I'm curious just what control Putin exerted over Trump while he was President?
 
#262
#262
lawgator1 said:
I don't see why it would/wouldn't (depending on whose listening) be Russia.
Click to expand...

That's a reach. How did Russia benefit? They didn't. Even knowing Russia was trying to meddle, we were never going to do more about it than toothless sanctions. We certainly weren't going to go to war over it. Really, our best option has always been to improve our own cybersecurity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
#265
#265
Weezer said:
I don't find you to be a very intelligent poster. You bring nothing to the table other than your sheepish talking points which you never support.
Click to expand...

If I brought all of the sources in Christendom to this forum to support my post, you'd still demand that I support my post and lie to everybody by saying I never do. How do I know that? I know because I have supported this and many other posts with multiple sources, and dumbasses still come along and claim I never support my posts. Happens all the time. After telling that lie, you got no credibility. Oh, and you know what else used to happen all the time? Somebody would challenge me to support my post and I would provide a list of links for them. They would either disappear or make some pathetically stupid criticism of the source. If you do not already know, it is because you choose to avoid information and remain committed to your ignorance, and there is nothing that I or anybody else can do about that. The reality is that if you wanted to know, you would have pulled up several sources to read instead of posting something pesky about me. You chose to be pesky because that is just the kind of person you are, ignorant and pesky. I have no count of the number of times I have posted sources for this topic, on this forum, but it's a lot.
 
Last edited:
#266
#266
Vol Main said:
If I brought all of the sources in Christendom to this forum to support my post, you'd still demand that I support my post and lie to everybody by saying I never do. How do I know that? I know because I have supported numerous of my posts with multiple sources, and dumbasses still come along and claim I never support my posts. Happens all the time. After telling that lie, you got no credibility.
Click to expand...
Don't believe you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40 and StarRaider
#268
#268
SoonerVol said:
Don't believe you.
Click to expand...

If I am wrong, then why didn't you take thirty minutes to look through some of the sources a search engine would put infront of you, instead of replying with a pesky comment? I've been around this track many times, hundreds of times on numerous boards. Get back to me when you have something to offer besides pesky comments. If you gave a damn, you would have looked up this topic and found plenty of sources for it. You didn't, because that is not the kind of person you are.
 
Last edited:
#269
#269
I mean if the entirety of the US intelligence and investigative services didn't find it we're supposed to believe some investigative journalists did?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
#271
#271
Vol Main said:
If I am wrong, then why didn't you take thirty minutes to look through some of the sources a search engine would put infront of you, instead of replying with a pesky comment? I've been around this track many times, hundreds of times on numerous boards. Get back to me when you have something to offer besides pesky comments. If you gave a damn, you would have looked up this topic and found plenty of sources for it. You didn't, because that is not the kind of person you are.
Click to expand...

So nobody believes your BS on numerous boards? If so it‘s a you problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40, StarRaider and InVOLuntary
#272
#272
Vol Main said:
If I am wrong, then why didn't you take thirty minutes to look through some of the sources a search engine would put infront of you, instead of replying with a pesky comment? I've been around this track many times, hundreds of times on numerous boards. Get back to me when you have something to offer besides pesky comments. If you gave a damn, you would have looked up this topic and found plenty of sources for it. You didn't, because that is not the kind of person you are.
Click to expand...
I meant I didn't believe your reason for not bringing sources.
 
#273
#273
Vol Main said:
If I brought all of the sources in Christendom to this forum to support my post, you'd still demand that I support my post and lie to everybody by saying I never do. How do I know that? I know because I have supported this and many other posts with multiple sources, and dumbasses still come along and claim I never support my posts. Happens all the time. After telling that lie, you got no credibility. Oh, and you know what else used to happen all the time? Somebody would challenge me to support my post and I would provide a list of links for them. They would either disappear or make some pathetically stupid criticism of the source. If you do not already know, it is because you choose to avoid information and remain committed to your ignorance, and there is nothing that I or anybody else can do about that. The reality is that if you wanted to know, you would have pulled up several sources to read instead of posting something pesky about me. You chose to be pesky because that is just the kind of person you are, ignorant and pesky. I have no count of the number of times I have posted sources for this topic, on this forum, but it's a lot.
Click to expand...

Weren’t you the one who demanded payment in order to show your research? Like 6 months or so ago?
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, StarRaider and hog88
#274
#274
Slate Journalist Sent Draft Of Story To Fusion GPS About Possible Link Between Trump, Russian Bank: Indictment

Journalist Franklin Foer appeared to admit Friday he was the journalist mentioned in a federal grand jury indictment who sent 2,500 words of his story to Fusion GPS the day before it was published.

The research firm hired by the Hillary Clinton campaign to investigate then-candidate Donald Trump wrote him it was "time to hurry" on the story for left-wing outlet Slate linking the Trump Organization and a Russian bank days before the 2016 election, according to the indictment of Democratic lawyer Michael Sussmann.

Foer was pressured by Fusion GPS, referred to as "U.S. Investigative Firm," to "hurry" on his story about the possible back
channel between Trump and the bank, according to the indictment, referring to him as "Reporter-2."

Franklin-Foer-GETTY.jpg

The Atlantic staff writer Franklin Foer appears to be "Reporter-2." (Photo by Amy Sussman/Getty Images) (Photo by Amy Sussman/Getty Images)

"The Investigative Firm Employee’s email stated, ‘time to hurry’ suggesting that Reporter-2 should hurry to publish an article regarding the Russian Bank-1 allegations. In response, Reporter-2 emailed to the Investigative Firm Employee a draft article regarding the Russian Bank-1 allegations, along with the cover message: ‘Here’s the first 2500 words,’" the indictment stated.

The indictment then notes Reporter-2 published an article regarding the allegations "on or about the following day, October, 31, 2016."

On Oct. 31, 2016, Slate published a piece written by Foer headlined, "Was a Trump Server Communicating With Russia?" The Clinton campaign hyped the story that day, with policy adviser Jake Sullivan – now President Biden's national security adviser – calling the "secret hotline" perhaps "the key to unlocking the mystery of Trump's ties to Russia."



Slate journalist sent draft of story to Fusion GPS about possible link between Trump, Russian bank: Indictment
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst and StarRaider
#275
#275
Franklin Pierce said:
Slate Journalist Sent Draft Of Story To Fusion GPS About Possible Link Between Trump, Russian Bank: Indictment

Journalist Franklin Foer appeared to admit Friday he was the journalist mentioned in a federal grand jury indictment who sent 2,500 words of his story to Fusion GPS the day before it was published.

The research firm hired by the Hillary Clinton campaign to investigate then-candidate Donald Trump wrote him it was "time to hurry" on the story for left-wing outlet Slate linking the Trump Organization and a Russian bank days before the 2016 election, according to the indictment of Democratic lawyer Michael Sussmann.

Foer was pressured by Fusion GPS, referred to as "U.S. Investigative Firm," to "hurry" on his story about the possible back
channel between Trump and the bank, according to the indictment, referring to him as "Reporter-2."

Franklin-Foer-GETTY.jpg

The Atlantic staff writer Franklin Foer appears to be "Reporter-2." (Photo by Amy Sussman/Getty Images) (Photo by Amy Sussman/Getty Images)

"The Investigative Firm Employee’s email stated, ‘time to hurry’ suggesting that Reporter-2 should hurry to publish an article regarding the Russian Bank-1 allegations. In response, Reporter-2 emailed to the Investigative Firm Employee a draft article regarding the Russian Bank-1 allegations, along with the cover message: ‘Here’s the first 2500 words,’" the indictment stated.

The indictment then notes Reporter-2 published an article regarding the allegations "on or about the following day, October, 31, 2016."

On Oct. 31, 2016, Slate published a piece written by Foer headlined, "Was a Trump Server Communicating With Russia?" The Clinton campaign hyped the story that day, with policy adviser Jake Sullivan – now President Biden's national security adviser – calling the "secret hotline" perhaps "the key to unlocking the mystery of Trump's ties to Russia."



Slate journalist sent draft of story to Fusion GPS about possible link between Trump, Russian bank: Indictment
Click to expand...


Sounds like the freaking root of the takedown coup of an American President by an opposition party. Seditious and corruption that deserves disinfectant
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbwhhs and Franklin Pierce
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top