The Russia Hoax: The Illicit Scheme to Clear Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump

#276
#276
Vol Main said:
If I brought all of the sources in Christendom to this forum to support my post, you'd still demand that I support my post and lie to everybody by saying I never do. How do I know that? I know because I have supported this and many other posts with multiple sources, and dumbasses still come along and claim I never support my posts. Happens all the time. After telling that lie, you got no credibility. Oh, and you know what else used to happen all the time? Somebody would challenge me to support my post and I would provide a list of links for them. They would either disappear or make some pathetically stupid criticism of the source. If you do not already know, it is because you choose to avoid information and remain committed to your ignorance, and there is nothing that I or anybody else can do about that. The reality is that if you wanted to know, you would have pulled up several sources to read instead of posting something pesky about me. You chose to be pesky because that is just the kind of person you are, ignorant and pesky. I have no count of the number of times I have posted sources for this topic, on this forum, but it's a lot.
Click to expand...
The problem is you believe what your Democrat overlords tell you to believe. It's no different than Trumpers who believe everything Trump says. I don't trust either side or any politician, and I don't buy into disinformation. If you want to swallow your party's propaganda, so be it, I can't stop you, but claiming it as "truth" or "fact" just doesn't fly.
 
#277
#277
Weezer said:
The problem is you believe what your Democrat overlords tell you to believe. It's no different than Trumpers who believe everything Trump says. I don't trust either side or any politician, and I don't buy into disinformation. If you want to swallow your party's propaganda, so be it, I can't stop you, but claiming it as "truth" or "fact" just doesn't fly.
Click to expand...

Did you think that bull hock up all by yourself? Nope. Those are standard goto lines for half of the smugly ignorant hillbillies on this board. I just put18 on ignore for putting them in my face for the third time in about a week. I might as well block you now but I try to cut a little slack. Odds are it won't do you any good. Thirty minutes is all it would take for you to hit a search engine and look through several sources. Are you too weak in the head to do that? Well, are you? As previously stated, I already posted links to articles for this, numerous times. How many times do you need me to do that for you, Weez? Five? Ten? Twenty-five? It wouldn't matter, because you actually believe that your bull hock lines are an acceptable substitute for doing the work and knowing what you're talking about. It is not. I'm calling bull hock all over you because that is all you're bringing.
 
Last edited:
#278
#278
Vol Main said:
Did you think that bull hock up all by yourself? Nope. Those are standard goto lines for half of the ignorant hillbillies on this board. I just put18 on ignore for putting them in my face for the third time in about a week. I might as well block you now but I try to cut a little slack. Odds are it won't do you any good. Thirty minutes is all it would take for you to hit a search engine and look through several sources. Are you too weak in the head to do that? Well, are you? As previously stated, I already posted links to articles for this, numerous times. How many times do you need me to do that for you, Weez? Five? Ten? Twenty-five? It wouldn't matter, because you actually believe that your bull hock lines are an acceptable substitute for doing the work and knowing what you're talking about. It is not. I'm calling bull hock all over you because that is all you're bringing.
Click to expand...
You should probably immediately ignore Weezer. It’s of critical importance to keep your socialist echo chamber fully intact.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#279
#279
Vol Main said:
Did you think that bull hock up all by yourself? Nope. Those are standard goto lines for half of the ignorant hillbillies on this board. I just put18 on ignore for putting them in my face for the third time in about a week. I might as well block you now but I try to cut a little slack. Odds are it won't do you any good. Thirty minutes is all it would take for you to hit a search engine and look through several sources. Are you too weak in the head to do that? Well, are you? As previously stated, I already posted links to articles for this, numerous times. How many times do you need me to do that for you, Weez? Five? Ten? Twenty-five? It wouldn't matter, because you actually believe that your bull hock lines are an acceptable substitute for doing the work and knowing what you're talking about. It is not. I'm calling bull hock all over you because that is all you're bringing.
Click to expand...
So he’s weak in the head but you’re the one putting everyone on ignore. Par for the course for you VM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and mrMet
#280
#280
Franklin Pierce said:
Slate Journalist Sent Draft Of Story To Fusion GPS About Possible Link Between Trump, Russian Bank: Indictment

Journalist Franklin Foer appeared to admit Friday he was the journalist mentioned in a federal grand jury indictment who sent 2,500 words of his story to Fusion GPS the day before it was published.

The research firm hired by the Hillary Clinton campaign to investigate then-candidate Donald Trump wrote him it was "time to hurry" on the story for left-wing outlet Slate linking the Trump Organization and a Russian bank days before the 2016 election, according to the indictment of Democratic lawyer Michael Sussmann.

Foer was pressured by Fusion GPS, referred to as "U.S. Investigative Firm," to "hurry" on his story about the possible back
channel between Trump and the bank, according to the indictment, referring to him as "Reporter-2."

Franklin-Foer-GETTY.jpg

The Atlantic staff writer Franklin Foer appears to be "Reporter-2." (Photo by Amy Sussman/Getty Images) (Photo by Amy Sussman/Getty Images)

"The Investigative Firm Employee’s email stated, ‘time to hurry’ suggesting that Reporter-2 should hurry to publish an article regarding the Russian Bank-1 allegations. In response, Reporter-2 emailed to the Investigative Firm Employee a draft article regarding the Russian Bank-1 allegations, along with the cover message: ‘Here’s the first 2500 words,’" the indictment stated.

The indictment then notes Reporter-2 published an article regarding the allegations "on or about the following day, October, 31, 2016."

On Oct. 31, 2016, Slate published a piece written by Foer headlined, "Was a Trump Server Communicating With Russia?" The Clinton campaign hyped the story that day, with policy adviser Jake Sullivan – now President Biden's national security adviser – calling the "secret hotline" perhaps "the key to unlocking the mystery of Trump's ties to Russia."



Slate journalist sent draft of story to Fusion GPS about possible link between Trump, Russian bank: Indictment
Click to expand...


We should never again question the length that dirt bags will go to lie on people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and Franklin Pierce
#281
#281
hUTch2002 said:
So he’s weak in the head but you’re the one putting everyone on ignore. Par for the course for you VM.
Click to expand...

So, how many times do you think I should post links for people on the same topic who really do not want to know? And how much of my time do you think I should waste with people who have nothing to offer but their smugly ignorant goto insults? If that is what you like, then you post with them.
 
#282
#282
Vol Main said:
Did you think that bull hock up all by yourself? Nope. Those are standard goto lines for half of the smugly ignorant hillbillies on this board. I just put18 on ignore for putting them in my face for the third time in about a week. I might as well block you now but I try to cut a little slack. Odds are it won't do you any good. Thirty minutes is all it would take for you to hit a search engine and look through several sources. Are you too weak in the head to do that? Well, are you? As previously stated, I already posted links to articles for this, numerous times. How many times do you need me to do that for you, Weez? Five? Ten? Twenty-five? It wouldn't matter, because you actually believe that your bull hock lines are an acceptable substitute for doing the work and knowing what you're talking about. It is not. I'm calling bull hock all over you because that is all you're bringing.
Click to expand...
I don't put people on ignore. Just not my thing. But if I did, you'd be top of the list with your insane zealotry. So kudos for that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franklin Pierce
#283
#283
Vol Main said:
So, how many times do you think I should post links for people on the same topic who really do not want to know? And how much of my time do you think I should waste with people who have nothing to offer but their smugly ignorant goto insults? If that is what you like, then you post with them.
Click to expand...
🤡🤡🤡🤡
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#284
#284
Vol Main said:
So, how many times do you think I should post links for people on the same topic who really do not want to know? And how much of my time do you think I should waste with people who have nothing to offer but their smugly ignorant goto insults? If that is what you like, then you post with them.
Click to expand...
It happens all the time man. You’ve made the choice to be on here so that comes with the territory. It is what it is.
 
#285
#285
hUTch2002 said:
It happens all the time man. You’ve made the choice to be on here so that comes with the territory. It is what it is.
Click to expand...

I am sorry to say, well yeah, that's right. But lookit, if you had any idea how much of my life has been spent covering contemporary and historical issues, you would realize how wrong it is to throw their usual, dismissive insults at me. 18 is one of the best writers on the FB forum, so I'll probably unfilter him when I go there. Here, sadly, he lacks self control for civil interaction on political issues. I do not know what he has of value to offer, but I have not seen much besides alternative stuff.
 
#286
#286
Weezer said:
I don't put people on ignore. Just not my thing. But if I did, you'd be top of the list with your insane zealotry. So kudos for that.
Click to expand...

It is not insane zealotry. I'm telling you that I have posted on boards for years, been around this track many many times, and there are some types of behavior that I am just sick and tired of seeing over and over and over. One is people demanding sources when they have no intention of learning anything from the sources they demand. It almost never happens. It would be a fair expectation but the reality is that it became an excuse for abusive misconduct. There are billions of people in this world. People differ in their backgrounds, abilities, and expectations of others. I enjoy discussing issues with people who discuss issues. Some people just cannot do it. Look how much time they cause to be totally wasted with nonsense. Ridiculous. If that is what you like, knock yourself out.
 
Last edited:
#287
#287
Vol Main said:
It is not insane zealotry. I'm telling you that I have posted on boards for years, been around this track many many times, and there are some types of behavior that I am just sick and tired of seeing over and over and over. One is people demanding sources when they have no intention of learning anything from the sources they demand. It almost never happens. It would be a fair expectation but the reality is that it became an excuse for abusive misconduct. There are billions of people in this world. People differ in their backgrounds, abilities, and expectations of others. I enjoy discussing issues with people who discuss issues. Some people just cannot do it. Look how much time they cause to be totally wasted with nonsense. Ridiculous. If that is what you like, knock yourself out.
Click to expand...
Posting a "source" does not mean it's a reliable source. I can post a "source" that Bigfoot is real, but that doesn't make it fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and Vol423
#288
#288
Vol Main said:
I am sorry to say, well yeah, that's right. But lookit, if you had any idea how much of my life has been spent covering contemporary and historical issues, you would realize how wrong it is to throw their usual, dismissive insults at me. 18 is one of the best writers on the FB forum, so I'll probably unfilter him when I go there. Here, sadly, he lacks self control for civil interaction on political issues. I do not know what he has of value to offer, but I have not seen much besides alternative stuff.
Click to expand...
I’d say a lot of people are different on here than in real life and most posters don’t know the backgrounds of others. This is just a form on entertainment, no one is changing minds on this board. Don’t take it personally or let it get to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol Main
#290
#290
Republicans are raising concerns that the judge appointed to the Sussmann case has too many conflicts of interest to preside over it fairly.

Current and former officials say that federal District Court Judge Christopher Cooper's professional and personal relationships with top Democrats and figures behind the FBI's Trump investigation should force his recusal. Cooper's wife, for instance, represents disgraced FBI lawyer Lisa Page, who oversaw the FBI's Trump probe.

Judge in case of anti-Trump mudslinger is married to attorney for ex-FBI lawyer Lisa Page
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#291
#291
VolinWayne said:
Republicans are raising concerns that the judge appointed to the Sussmann case has too many conflicts of interest to preside over it fairly.

Current and former officials say that federal District Court Judge Christopher Cooper's professional and personal relationships with top Democrats and figures behind the FBI's Trump investigation should force his recusal. Cooper's wife, for instance, represents disgraced FBI lawyer Lisa Page, who oversaw the FBI's Trump probe.

Judge in case of anti-Trump mudslinger is married to attorney for ex-FBI lawyer Lisa Page
Click to expand...

Funny how the only indictment was a "civilian". Tells us all we need to know right there. Corrupt beyond corrupt
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, StarRaider, davethevol and 1 other person
#293
#293
Weezer said:
Posting a "source" does not mean it's a reliable source. I can post a "source" that Bigfoot is real, but that doesn't make it fact.
Click to expand...

Some people work to develop a mental context with sound background knowledge and analytical skills, to truth test information and misinformation about social issues. Obviously, many people lack those skills. They lazily rely instead on associations, including false associations, because they just never worked hard enough to develop the ability to do better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USAFgolferVol
#296
#296
Vol423 said:
You should probably immediately ignore Weezer. It’s of critical importance to keep your socialist echo chamber fully intact.
Click to expand...

You are mistaken. I do not abide in a socialist echo chamber. Am I tired of wasting my time with BS addicted people? Yes, very. If you seek the comfort of believing things that are wrong in order to think and say something bad about me, then that is your problem, and there is nothing that I can do to help you.
 
#297
#297
Comedian Russell Brand: ‘Trump Was Right About Hillary and Russia’

Firebrand English comedian Russell Brand is admitting Donald Trump was right about Russia all along — after the Department of Justice charged a lawyer linked to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign with lying to the FBI to create the impression that the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia.

The outspoken comedian posted a video to Youtube titled: “So…Trump was RIGHT About Clinton & Russia Collusion!!”

After reviewing the latest news on the charges, Brand said he was “flabbergasted” by the fact that the evidence now seems to show that “Russiagate was a Democratic conspiracy.”

Brand said that as a leftist, he wants to believe that the Democrat Party is the party of “diversity and truth and social justice.” But he added that the new evidence is worrisome. “What my concern is becoming is that these are totemic issues pushed to the forefront to mask ordinary, regular corruption,” he said.

Comedian Russell Brand: 'Trump Was Right About Hillary and Russia'
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#298
#298
On Sept. 22, Michael Sussmann appeared via video at the first status conference held in Special Counsel John Durham’s criminal case against the former Clinton attorney. During the hearing, the government noted some disclosure material likely included classified information, spinning speculation of what those documents might be.

But while the prosecution remains in its infant stages, and it will be some time before the country knows more details related to Sussmann’s role in Spygate, the biggest backers of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax have already exonerated Sussmann. That fits a long pattern of collusion spinners downplaying every investigative advance into their Russia hoax.

5 False Narratives About The Spygate Indictment Of Michael Sussmann
 
#300
#300
Durham Issues New Subpoenas in Probe of FBI Russia Investigation, Targets Clinton Campaign Law Firm

Special Counsel John Durham, the attorney tapped by the Trump administration to audit the Russia investigation, has reportedly handed down a new set of subpoenas, including to a law firm with ties to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign.

The grand jury subpoenas for documents were issued earlier this month, according to CNN, after Durham charged Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann for allegedly knowingly making a false statement to the FBI.

Investigators from the special counsel’s office are seeking additional documents from Sussmann’s former law firm, Perkins Coie, an indication that Durham may be looking to add to Sussmann’s charges or to bring cases against other defendants.

John Durham Issues New Subpoenas | National Review
 
  • Like
Reactions: volinbham
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top