If the guy that died had a gun at least he would have had the opportunity to defend himself from the criminal. But as luck would have it as a law abiding citizen he was denied that right.If there had only been multiple people with guns--none of whom knew who was good or bad--I'm sure all the bullets flying who have just magically found the bad guys.
Well this might blow your mind but I stand by my statement. Unless he had a conviction limiting his access to firearms why should this person be actively prevented from protecting themselves by their own damn government?I think it was a rival gang thing..
Well this might blow your mind but I stand by my statement. Unless he had a conviction limiting his access to firearms why should this person be actively prevented from protecting themselves by their own damn government?
I guess the cops put a sheet over the body when they got there. Problem solved.
If the guy that died had a gun at least he would have had the opportunity to defend himself from the criminal. But as luck would have it as a law abiding citizen he was denied that right.
There is no such reference to that in either article abuela.My understanding is that the gun was wrestled away from him and used on him instead. No gun, no one dead. Weird how that works.
There is no such reference to that in either article abuela.
Also again what’s your plan to get the criminals on board with not shooting the law abiding citizens? “I just called the cops so you guys have to put your guns away and stop now. That’s the rules.”
Absolutely stupid and no way in hell would any rational person agree to that as valid protection in place of the right to actively defending themselves.
Fine, new article.MS-13 gang member in custody in deadly NYC subway shooting caught on video - NY Daily News
"Mosso pulled a gun, and Gutierrez wrestled it away from him. Mosso got up, a shot rang out and he dropped to the concrete, officials said."
Lol. So no answer ok. You have absolutely zero means to validate why law abiding citizens should willingly give up their constitutional right of personal defense. Thus the dumbass jokes.That's why you take everyone's guns away, melt them down, and turn them into gay wedding cake ornaments.
He didn't mention that there would be a government shutdown in 10 days if nothing was agreed on? I could've swore he did.For all the people who at one time or another argued that either (1) the shutdown was good, or (2) Trump "won" with the shutdown, please note that he mentioned it zero times in the SOTU.
Why is that?