davethevol
Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful......
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2009
- Messages
- 17,544
- Likes
- 21,545
Signature verification, wasnt that a problem with 2020 as well....if I remember the % accepted were lower then previously meaning less verification done
Great source. "Uncoverdc.com" was founded by a Q Anon promoter.
Great source. "Uncoverdc.com" was founded by a Q Anon promoter.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/uncoverdc/
QUESTIONABLE
That is a far right conspiracy web site.
- Overall, we rate UncoverDC extreme right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of debunked conspiracy theories and pseudoscience, the use of poor sources who routinely fail fact checks, and a lack of transparency with ownership.
Then you should be able to find that information somewhere else besides a far right conspiracy-ridden web site. Outlets such as Fox News and The New York Post would also be reporting it.It is 98% testimony by a credible source in an affidavit.
I call just about everything I read or hear from the MSM to be QUESTIONABLE. Even the fact checkers often lie. FACT
I find the MSM to be nothung but a propaganda arm of the Dem Party. Shall we play this game?
https://www.heritage.org/progressiv...checkers-falsely-claim-they-are-fact-checkers
Then you should be able to find that information somewhere else besides a far right conspiracy-ridden web site. Outlets such as Fox News and The New York Post would also be reporting it.
Unless he gets it from his daily dose of CNN on his knees he doesn't believe anything...It is 98% testimony by a credible source in an affidavit.
I call just about everything I read or hear from the MSM to be QUESTIONABLE. Even the fact checkers often lie. FACT
I find the MSM to be nothung but a propaganda arm of the Dem Party. Shall we play this game?
https://www.heritage.org/progressiv...checkers-falsely-claim-they-are-fact-checkers
That's not true... but if the only outlet reporting it is a far right conspiracy site, founded by a Q Anon promoter? Then I'm going to be suspicious of it, and unless you are a gullible idiot, you should be as well.Unless he gets it from his daily dose of CNN on his knees he doesn't believe anything...
Great source. "Uncoverdc.com" was founded by a Q Anon promoter.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/uncoverdc/
QUESTIONABLE
That is a far right conspiracy web site.
- Overall, we rate UncoverDC extreme right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of debunked conspiracy theories and pseudoscience, the use of poor sources who routinely fail fact checks, and a lack of transparency with ownership.
Great source. "Uncoverdc.com" was founded by a Q Anon promoter.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/uncoverdc/
QUESTIONABLE
That is a far right conspiracy web site.
- Overall, we rate UncoverDC extreme right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of debunked conspiracy theories and pseudoscience, the use of poor sources who routinely fail fact checks, and a lack of transparency with ownership.
Robert Barnes
@barnes_law
·
14h
Honest media headline of AZ Supreme Court today in @KariLake case would be: "Arizona Supreme Court orders trial court "shall forthwith" proceed with the signature verification issue, while denying attorneys' fees request from county lawyers." Oddly, both facts missing from media.
====================
Rasmussen Reports
@Rasmussen_Poll
Update: Apparently upwards of 300,000 mail ballots in Maricopa County Arizona will now be checked for missing or mismatched signature issues in a race that has captured international attention and is divided by less than 15,000 'votes.'
Waiting to see the actual court order.
===================
Lou Dobbs
@LouDobbs
·
9h
Arizona Supreme Court advances Kari Lake's claims of cheating in the Maricopa County election-Supreme Court appears annoyed that lower court isn't timely in following the Supreme Court orders.
#TheGreatAmericaShow
==================
AZ Supreme Court orders hearing on Kari Lake's signature verification issue, denies attorney fees
Signature verification is a recipe for chaos and a complete waste of time. It's really a convenient way for the GOP to throw out legitimate votes,
which I'm sure is the idea. Nobody signs their name the exact same way all the time. More to the point, there is no evidence
at all, and never has been, that signature fraud is an issue. It hasn't been, and it isn't. This is just another way for Republicans to try and steal
elections. The only real fraud that's being attempted is by the GOP--FACT. They are the people who worked in various ways, in many states,
to suppress Democratic votes. Who disputes that?
I'm happy to see that you recognize the dangers of vote by mail. You're coming around.
Signature verification is a recipe for chaos and a complete waste of time. It's really a convenient way for the GOP to throw out legitimate votes,
which I'm sure is the idea. Nobody signs their name the exact same way all the time. More to the point, there is no evidence
at all, and never has been, that signature fraud is an issue. It hasn't been, and it isn't. This is just another way for Republicans to try and steal
elections. The only real fraud that's being attempted is by the GOP--FACT. They are the people who worked in various ways, in many states,
to suppress Democratic votes. Who disputes that?