MUR73
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2008
- Messages
- 1,384
- Likes
- 0
First, all Christians are obliged to spread the Good Word, as well.
Second, how big is this "significant number" of Muslims will affirm that they have a "mandate" to use violence to do so? And what is your source for that number?
Third, are you not mixing a "mandate" to use violence to "spread" the Muslim faith with terrorists who are faithful in their religion and draw strength from that but who are motivated by politics?[/QUOTE]
LG, just where area all this peace loving, American flag-waving , love every body , regadless of faith Muslims at? I have seen plenty of other kind. Even the nonviolent ones do not seem very interested in Coexisting with the evil Zionists.
First, all Christians are obliged to spread the Good Word, as well.
Second, how big is this "significant number" of Muslims will affirm that they have a "mandate" to use violence to do so? And what is your source for that number?
Third, are you not mixing a "mandate" to use violence to "spread" the Muslim faith with terrorists who are faithful in their religion and draw strength from that but who are motivated by politics?
I think people tend to overlook the obvious religous bias of Obama that seems to be most public - none at all.
If he leans either way - Christian or Muslim - it is in name only and none in practice. His public demeanor seems to simply not care about religion except when his job requires him to.
more muslims drink alcohol than you think. They're like Baptists in that regard.
I personally don't know any who drink.
Besides... A sizable number of the founding fathers probably didn't even believe in Christ, and others were pretty clearly influenced by Deist ideology.
Bottom line is that makes them un-Christian. As long as the US government doesn't align itself with any particular religion, I don't really care if the POTUS is Christian, Deist, Muslim, Buddhist, Shinto, Taoist or even a Scientologist (well, maybe Scientologist). I will judge him by his actions and his actions alone.
The problem is that you have this rabid bunch of conspiracy theorists who think that Obama is in cahoots with freakin' Al-Qaeda or Hamas or the Muslim Brotherhood to bring about the end of America.
while in AZ I used to watch CFB games with a Muslim guy who was an Auburn fan. He came to hang out with the UT alum club since the AU one met too far away. He definitely drank (as long as he wasn't fasting). Interesting guy though
I personally don't know any who drink.
Besides... A sizable number of the founding fathers probably didn't even believe in Christ, and others were pretty clearly influenced by Deist ideology.Bottom line is that makes them un-Christian. As long as the US government doesn't align itself with any particular religion, I don't really care if the POTUS is Christian, Deist, Muslim, Buddhist, Shinto, Taoist or even a Scientologist (well, maybe Scientologist). I will judge him by his actions and his actions alone.
Link?
i think most are concerned he is massively sympathetic to muslims which so far appears to be accurate.
Nobody thinks he's in cahoots with the Muslim Brotherhood or any "extremist group.
Cahoots with the Weather Underground members? Yes. You'd have to blind to think he's not.
Your leap is a huge one.
WallBuilders - Issues and Articles - The Founding Fathers on Jesus, Christianity and the Bible
That is a falicy actually contrived and cooked up by progressives just after the turn of the last century.Just click on the link and read the actual words of our Forefathers, not some Liberal professors spin on them.
http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=8755
Enjoy the FACTS.
WallBuilders - Issues and Articles - The Founding Fathers on Jesus, Christianity and the Bible
That is a falicy actually contrived and cooked up by progressives just after the turn of the last century.Just click on the link and read the actual words of our Forefathers, not some Liberal professors spin on them.
http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=8755
Enjoy the FACTS.
Some books against Deism fell into my hands; they were said to be the substance of sermons preached at Boyle's Lectures. It happened that they wrought an effect on me quite contrary to what was intended by them; for the arguments of the Deists, which were quoted to be refuted, appeared to me much stronger than the refutations; in short, I soon became a thorough Deist.
...
I grew convinc'd that truth, sincerity and integrity in dealings between man and man were of the utmost importance to the felicity of life; and I form'd written resolutions, which still remain in my journal book, to practice them ever while I lived. Revelation had indeed no weight with me, as such; but I entertain'd an opinion that, though certain actions might not be bad because they were forbidden by it, or good because it commanded them, yet probably these actions might be forbidden because they were bad for us, or commanded because they were beneficial to us, in their own natures, all the circumstances of things considered. And this persuasion, with the kind hand of Providence, or some guardian angel, or accidental favorable circumstances and situations, or all together, preserved me, thro' this dangerous time of youth, and the hazardous situations I was sometimes in among strangers, remote from the eye and advice of my father, without any willful gross immorality or injustice, that might have been expected from my want of religion.
- Benjamin Franklin
What is meant by "massively sympathetic?" If you mean that he is not willing to base his foreign policy on grand suppositions and assumption about a billion people based on their fringe terroristic elements, okay. If you mean he won't fight the actual terrorists on their home court in Afghanistan, the facts prove otherwise. If you mean he won't pointlessly try to interfere in Egypt's internal turmoil, at least publicly,okay.
Yes they do. Watch them. Look at how they practically leap out of their seats, wild eyed and irrationally adamant that he's lying when he says he's Christian and that he is affirmatively basing his policy on being Muslim. They said it. Its right there in the video.
P.S. notice the footnotes of references provided below the quotes so it is not someones opinion/interpretation of what was said its their actual words.
WallBuilders - Issues and Articles - The Founding Fathers on Jesus, Christianity and the Bible
That is a falicy actually contrived and cooked up by progressives just after the turn of the last century.Just click on the link and read the actual words of our Forefathers, not some Liberal professors spin on them.
Enjoy the FACTS.
I have read a good bit of source material for myself.
Again, my bottom line is that the country was founded by and for free-thinking people, not by and for men of any particular religious beliefs. As such, I don't see why it should matter to anybody what the POTUS or any particular candidate believes in, other than they might have the same core of values in a common religion. But that is values for values' sake, not directly because of religion.
If a Muslim man showed himself capable of intelligence and rational decision-making, and overall ideas for government that I agreed with, I would vote for him for president.