The Supreme Court of the United States Thread

[Jxn Vol]

Funny how they never found the leaker.

 

[Orangeburst]

Elena Kagan Says SCOTUS Might Lose Legitimacy If It Ignores Public Opinion

Wow..how the hell did she get appointed.

 

[sonofUT62]

Elena Kagan Says SCOTUS Might Lose Legitimacy If It Ignores Public Opinion

Wow..how the hell did she get appointed.

How did she get appointed to the positions she held in the Clinton Admin? Checked boxes and an open animosity towards the US military?

 

[Jxn Vol]

Elena Kagan Says SCOTUS Might Lose Legitimacy If It Ignores Public Opinion

Wow..how the hell did she get appointed.

Michael told his then president husband, Barry, to appoint her.

 

[Orangeslice13]

Michael told his then president husband, Barry, to appoint her.

That kinda thing doesn’t do much for your credibility.
Michelle has a pecker is more played out than the orange man hate.

 

[RikidyBones]

That kinda thing doesn’t do much for your credibility.
Michelle has a pecker is more played out than the orange man hate.

Idk... You didn't see Michelle has a Johnson anytime you tuned into the news.

 

[Orangeslice13]

Idk... You didn't see Michelle has a Johnson anytime you tuned into the news.

That garbage is everywhere and there’s no excuse for it.
If you want credibility in a debate then you should stay away from the tribal garbage.
(you in general not you specifically)

 

[StarRaider]

Judge Thompson? Who dat?

surprised that she did not call him Judge Uncle Thompson

 

[RikidyBones]

That garbage is everywhere and there’s no excuse for it.
If you want credibility in a debate then you should stay away from the tribal garbage.
(you in general not you specifically)

I don't disagree.

 

[CagleMtnVol]

That kinda thing doesn’t do much for your credibility.
Michelle has a pecker is more played out than the orange man hate.

Doesn't necessarily mean he's wrong?

 

[Orangeslice13]

Doesn't necessarily mean he's wrong?

just means he’s a partisan hack with no credibility

 

[Jxn Vol]

That kinda thing doesn’t do much for your credibility.
Michelle has a pecker is more played out than the orange man hate.

I don’t take things that seriously on a college sports message board. If anyone is looking for credibility here they are trying too hard. This is supposed to be a fun way to blow off steam. At least that is what I use this for.

Sorry if my earlier post was nuts. Don’t get to hung up on it. I will try to package it differently next time.

 

[Orangeslice13]

I don’t take things that seriously on a college sports message board. If anyone is looking for credibility here they are trying too hard. This is supposed to be a fun way to blow off steam. At least that is what I use this for.

Sorry if my earlier post was nuts. Don’t get to hung up on it. I will try to package it differently next time.

Fly your flag. If you enjoy Brazil nutz and rainbows then good for you. I understand your motivation now and I agree that you have the right to play for whichever team you choose.

 

[Jxn Vol]

Fly your flag. If you enjoy Brazil nutz and rainbows then good for you. I understand your motivation now and I agree that you have the right to play for whichever team you choose.

Careful now. Joking around like this and you could lose your credibility. This is a place where serious chit gets ironed out.

 

[Orangeslice13]

Careful now. Joking around like this and you could lose your credibility. This is a place where serious chit gets ironed out.

What are you talking about. i was agreeing with you

 

[Jxn Vol]

What are you talking about. i was agreeing with you

I was using sarcasm.

 

[Orangeslice13]

I was using sarcasm.

 

[Jxn Vol]

View attachment 475245

I can’t help you understand if you can’t understand.

 

[Orangeslice13]

 

[Jxn Vol]

View attachment 475268

Bye

 

[hog88]

I'm glad that they are finally talking about term limits for justices I don't know if I like this particular plan of 18 year terms and a president getting to appoint a new justice every 24 months, might be a good thing IDK. I don't see how simple congressional legislation could pass constitutional muster though, wouldn't it take an amendment?

Democrats introduce bill requiring term limits for US supreme court justices

 

[Orangeburst]

I'm glad that they are finally talking about term limits for justices I don't know if I like this particular plan of 18 year terms and a president getting to appoint a new justice every 24 months, might be a good thing IDK. I don't see how simple congressional legislation could pass constitutional muster though, wouldn't it take an amendment?

Democrats introduce bill requiring term limits for US supreme court justices

You can bet your last dollar that the Dems are trying to gain leverage. Only now that they lost a few cases do they want to change rules like electoral college and DC statehood and Senatorial represention. The list goes on and on.

 

[VOLS INC.]

I'm glad that they are finally talking about term limits for justices I don't know if I like this particular plan of 18 year terms and a president getting to appoint a new justice every 24 months, might be a good thing IDK. I don't see how simple congressional legislation could pass constitutional muster though, wouldn't it take an amendment?

Democrats introduce bill requiring term limits for US supreme court justices

Not opposed to the premise. But look at “Journalism” today.

“US House Democrats have introduced a bill to establish term limits for supreme court justices, after an unprecedented term in which the highest court produced a series of deeply conservative rulings upending American law.”

I guess “Deeply conservative” is now defined as allowing states to decide the manner in which they address abortion, and upholding 1st and 2nd amendment rights.

 

[Orangeburst]

Not opposed to the premise. But look at “Journalism” today.

“US House Democrats have introduced a bill to establish term limits for supreme court justices, after an unprecedented term in which the highest court produced a series of deeply conservative rulings upending American law.”

I guess “Deeply conservative” is now defined as allowing states to decide the manner in which they address abortion, and upholding 1st and 2nd amendment rights.

Who on the conservative side is on the retirement docket other than Thomas?

 

[hog88]

Not opposed to the premise. But look at “Journalism” today.

“US House Democrats have introduced a bill to establish term limits for supreme court justices, after an unprecedented term in which the highest court produced a series of deeply conservative rulings upending American law.”

I guess “Deeply conservative” is now defined as allowing states to decide the manner in which they address abortion, and upholding 1st and 2nd amendment rights.

Yeah journalism is dead, they are all propagandists now.