The Supreme Court of the United States Thread

[TNVOLNAVY]

Yeahhhh!!! Give us that extra pollution!! Bring on the smog!!! That'll show em

 

[IluvdoubleD's]

First, I like Justice Roberts as a dem. I doubted he would be a centralist, but he has voted that way every time. I have no problems with judge Roberts. Secondly, I like that they made a good will move to KBJ today. Watch out for Thomas and his (probable) russian spy wife, We got you.

 

[theFallGuy]

this may have been posted already

Supreme Court limits the power the EPA has to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions | Daily Mail Online

 

[Mr_Henley]

The U.S. wins again. This helps slows down the attempt to implement global ESG scores through the EPA.

Globalism and government overreach lose again today. Let the Marxist salt continue to flow.

 

[TNVOLNAVY]

Yes, Congress is full of idiots.

 

[ButchPlz]

Yes, Congress is full of idiots.

I guess she hasn't met many people in most of the federal agencies impacted then.

 

[VOLS INC.]

Checks and balances. Suck it Obummer

 

[Vol423]

Yes, Congress is full of idiots.

These comments by Kagan are strikingly disingenuous. Congressmen don't write bills. Agency members and lobbyists write the texts of the bills. They know MORE THAN ENOUGH to include the relevant details in the bills passed by Congress. They choose not do so because they would be unable to pass the laws if they included the details of what they planned to actually do. Furthermore, ambiguity also provides cover for the moderates on the other side of the aisle to claim ignorance of the details when voting for bills that have no business ever becoming law.

 

[DC_Vol]

These comments by Kagan are strikingly disingenuous. Congressmen don't write bills. Agency members and lobbyists write the texts of the bills. They know MORE THAN ENOUGH to include the relevant details in the bills passed by Congress. They choose not do so because they would be unable to pass the laws if they included the details of what they planned to actually do. Furthermore, ambiguity also provides cover for the moderates on the other side of the aisle to claim ignorance of the details when voting for bills that have shouldn't ever become law.

She’s really saying, “I don’t have a legal argument, so I need to look elsewhere to further my preferred ideology.”

 

[VolStrom]

These comments by Kagan are strikingly disingenuous. Congressmen don't write bills. Agency members and lobbyists write the texts of the bills. They know MORE THAN ENOUGH to include the relevant details in the bills passed by Congress. They choose not do so because they would be unable to pass the laws if they included the details of what they planned to actually do. Furthermore, ambiguity also provides cover for the moderates on the other side of the aisle to claim ignorance of the details when voting for bills that have no business ever becoming law.

Kagen is a politician, not a justice. She doesn't care one bit about the constitution, and I doubt she's ever read it with the way she has voted since she's been on the bench.

 

[0nelilreb]

First, I like Justice Roberts as a dem. I doubted he would be a centralist, but he has voted that way every time. I have no problems with judge Roberts. Secondly, I like that they made a good will move to KBJ today. Watch out for Thomas and his (probable) russian spy wife, We got you.

 

[GroverCleveland]

Exactly.

She’s really saying, “I don’t have a legal argument, so I need to look elsewhere to further my preferred ideology.”

Exactly.

 

[landscapingvol]

View attachment 468585

He is on a whole different level of reality than the rest of us

 

[C-south]

Yeahhhh!!! Give us that extra pollution!! Bring on the smog!!! That'll show em

Says the person that’s smokes like a chimney.

 

[DancingOutlaw]

Yeahhhh!!! Give us that extra pollution!! Bring on the smog!!! That'll show em

If you spent the last four years terrified of Trump the dictator taking over our government you should be delighted that SCOTUS is reigning in de facto law making by federal agencies beholden to no one.

 

[K-town Vol Fan]

Says the person that’s smokes like a chimney.

Yes I smoke weed so I must support the destruction of the planet.

 

[C-south]

Yes I smoke weed so I must support the destruction of the planet.

Typical hyperbole.

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Supreme Court Will Hear Case On Radical Voting Rights Theory

A case brought by North Carolina Republicans could wipe out protections against extreme partisan gerrymandering and endanger voting rights.
https://www.huffpost.com/author/paul-blumenthal
The Supreme Court will hear arguments in its fall 2022 session on whether state courts play any role in judging the constitutionality of election laws and legislative district maps passed by state legislatures.

The case of Moore v. Harper is brought by Republicans in the North Carolina state legislature who claim that state courts have no say on whether the voting laws they write or the district maps they adopt are unconstitutional under their state’s constitution.


Supreme Court Will Hear Case On Radical Voting Rights Theory

 

[Vol737]

SIAP, but who else caught this??
The first???

 

[bamawriter]

SIAP, but who else caught this??
The first???
View attachment 468655

Well, they were going to put "first black woman" but they had to run it by a biologist first.

 

[VOLS INC.]

Well, they were going to put "first black woman" but they had to run it by a biologist first.

5 star reply. Well done sir.

 

[BreatheUT]

.

Was this another prediction?

 

[VOLS INC.]

Was this another prediction?

It’s one of LGs best post if you ask me.

 

[Orangeslice13]

.

This may be your best point ever.

 

[Vol423]

Yes I smoke weed so I must support the destruction of the planet.

Nope…just our country.