OrangeTsar
Alabama delenda est
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 19,218
- Likes
- 47,070
I appreciate the expansion on your thoughts. Thank you.
I disagree with both possible scenarios in your last paragraph.
I share your distrust.You're right, we're more likely to run through the Soylent variations before we start bringing the Sandmen into play.
In truth I'd have to ruminate on this a bit more before forwarding a real answer specific to this scenario. I will say my distrust of government lends itself to the idea that any crisis that can be used (let alone manufactured) to leverage more power will, more often than not, be used to gain control by those in a position to take advantage.
But we have real problems right here, problems like drag shows.
Having seen the bills coming out of committee for about 30 years, I'll take legislatures spending time on non existent issues, thank you.The drag show thing is stupid. Memphis is bluest area in the state by far and I'm not sure I could find a drag show if I tried...
But instead of getting bills out of committee that will create jobs, our legislators are spending time with a non-existent issue. If my young child saw a drag show, that is a parenting issue, not a government issue.
That is the definition of scary....
Dutch politicians in an effort to show they are protecting their voters from the climate change boogeyman are "getting serious" with climate destroying activities. They single handedly protecting their country, a third of which is below sea level, by mandating changes at home.It’s just more control. Does it matter what it’s for?
What’s your take?
I can agree with all of that.Dutch politicians in an effort to show they are protecting their voters from the climate change boogeyman are "getting serious" with climate destroying activities. They single handedly protecting their country, a third of which is below sea level, by mandating changes at home.
That's my take. Idiots in charge trying to protect their powerful positions with populism.