So, what name was butchna going by back when Dooley was coach?
UO could and probably "should" , but I think ppl blow the Ducks skill and speed out of proportion. UT's recruiting has actually been more solid across the board even during UO's rise and UT's fall. Lyerla will be tough to contain and DThomas as well. They have a handful of elite players ,but the rest of the team is very average and they no longer have CK running the show. Just his presence was good for 14 pts. I'll be shocked if they don't take a big step back this year. It's more possible than it seems.
I hear ya on the speed thing. Oregon has phenomenal speed I'll give them that. But the thing I've noticed is that they give up size for speed. Their speed guys are always 180-190lbs. SEC has big fast guys. The size speed ratio of the SEC is unparalleled. As for team speed, I'd say Bama, UF, UGA, LSU have as good of team speed as Oregon. Maybe another team or two. I noticed when Oregon played LSU and Auburn, they didn't get the edge on their little draw read like they usually do. A 250lb. fast LB was there waiting on the RB. Yet the very first play of the game against Auburn they did a sweep to McCalleb and he turned the corner for about 30 yards. The safety better nudged him OB or he would have went 70 yds. It was glaringly obvious they weren't used to seeing that kind of speed from other teams.
Yeh if Chip had stayed and started getting those LSU and Bama type guys in the trenches, they'd have been a machine from hell. However, that isn't the case and I don't see them maintaining the momentum they had. Hope I'm wrong cause I like watching them play, but I'd much rather see Tennessee stomp a mudhole in their a**es.
UO could and probably "should" , but I think ppl blow the Ducks skill and speed out of proportion. UT's recruiting has actually been more solid across the board even during UO's rise and UT's fall. Lyerla will be tough to contain and DThomas as well. They have a handful of elite players ,but the rest of the team is very average and they no longer have CK running the show. Just his presence was good for 14 pts. I'll be shocked if they don't take a big step back this year. It's more possible than it seems.
So, if we are attempting to explain the discrepancy between Oregon's recruiting rankings and their offensive productivity, much of the credit obviously goes to Kelly's offensive scheme and their explosive skilled position players. Given the success that they have recently enjoyed, however, why, in your opinion, hasn't that translated into more elite offensive line signees. And did Kelly essentially pay lip service to recruiting defensive personnel because he knew that he could outscore most opponents?