VolTSX23
UT Alumnus
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2006
- Messages
- 2,547
- Likes
- 0
1. the first thing you've said i agre with.
2. it was your word choice...not mine, and in this case it did matter...there is no arguement over who is elligible, there is though an arguement on who could be considered more deserving. that's the difference. if you don't want to debate the deserving aspect, you had the opportunity to squelch that by simply stating that the system doesn't allow for it, so it's not an issue. that isn't what your question asked or stated. it asked who was more deserving. and there are teams that are more deserving. So don't ask that question, and use the eligibility rules as your defense of why they aren't deserving. stating such, really just refutes your original point, as there is no other reason for ND to be in o/t than that rule.
3. SEC "homer love" has nothing to do with the opinion that giving credit to a team for losing is ridiculous, just because of who they lost to? it still makes no sense to me, and i beileve GAVol, Hat and myself, along with others, are still perplexed as to how you can, in the same breath say Auburn beat better quality teams than ND, but since ND got waxed by Mich and USC, that in some way makes their season better? that still makes no sense to me. who did ND beat to garner such respect? is all the respect you show them simply based on the fact that USC and Mich are simply on the schedule, regardless of outcome???? If that's the case, why play the games? just line up a schedule with a bunch of big boys each year and compare...who ever has the better schedule wins...no need to play the games...because you simply have them on the schedule??? can i assume then that Vandy gets as much or more credit for losing to michigan, but by not such a great margin as ND dont' forget, Vandy also only lost to FL by a TD, Vandy could, by your logic, based on who they lost to, be as "deserving" as anyone??? i doubt it. it's a ridiculous argument.
4. as for your opposing viewpoint debate....it's the same for me. I oppose your view point, so why don't you "expand your horizions" and take your own advice.
not everyone is going to agree with you when post a topic. so just don't get on a high horse when someone calls you out on something, like we're all doing some great injustice by saying this is a ridiculous standpoint to take regarding an issue.
1. Agree
2. Agree
3. Agree
4. Agree