bpalmer28
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 12,182
- Likes
- 19,832
First part is spot on. Second part, I doubt very much coach cares at all about sending signals in the middle of an SEC game, he’s just trying to win and get out.It was three plays and no intent to do anything but hand off, so what's the point of bringing in Nico?
Also, just speculation, but maybe Heupel wanted to send a signal that Joe is his guy
That's why I said maybe.First part is spot on. Second part, I doubt very much coach cares at all about sending signals in the middle of an SEC game, he’s just trying to win and get out.
If the score was something like 56-14, I’d be inclined to agree, but if I try to put myself in Heupel’s shoes, putting Nico in for the end of the SC game doesn’t even cross my mind. Just leave Joe out there, forget giving the freshman garbage minutes, finish the job, and move on to the bye week.That's why I said maybe.
But to play devil's advocate, forget the "signals" part. Maybe he was just sick of being asked about Nico and so left Joe in.
I thought this was an interesting point to brought up by Crompton. With Milton a little banged up, why not bring Nico in to hand the ball off with 3 minutes left?
Look, next year, Nico starts with Chattanooga, UTEP, NC State.
And perhaps Nico isn’t trusted. I don’t 2nd guess Heupel. Never have. If Nico can’t be trusted to hand the ball off that would be pause for concern and indicate we may be looking to the portal for 2024 QB. But more than likely they’re wanting to redshirt him.If he had come in for 3 snaps, the same people would be saying "What's the point of bringing Nico in for these nothing snaps? He's not going to learn anything from that garbage. He needs more snaps!"
Perhaps it's Josh Heupel's team. Perhaps he is capable of subbing players without being second guessed. Just perhaps.