Titans Seek Evidence of Tampering in Albert Haynesworth Deal

#126
#126
Do you not grasp any reality at all? Since 2002 you are a whopping 2 games better. Whooptie fickin do.

And you obviously have no clue about Bud Adams because he's been ripped with regularity for his micromanagemnt blunders of the Oilers/Titans for his entire tenure.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#127
#127
volfanbill said:
Do you not grasp any reality at all? Since 2002 you are a whopping 2 games better. Whooptie fickin do.

And you obviously have no clue about Bud Adams because he's been ripped with regularity for his micromanagemnt blunders of the Oilers/Titans for his entire tenure.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

I don't know about that. The only time I remember Bud Adams getting involved was when he wanted Vince because of the Texas connection. Jeff Fisher is the one making decisions and that is why Floyd Reese was fired because there was a power struggle between Reese and Fisher.
 
#128
#128
Forget 1-3-5-10-20 years

How about we talk all time?


Redskins: 537-494-27
Titans: 363-371-6

Hmm looks like the Titans have more losses then wins overall, or what we like to call in the sports world a losing record, or below .500. Combine that with the fact you have goose egg SB rings= pretty mediocre orginization

BTW you never brought up how many HOFers the Titans have?
 
#129
#129
615 Vol said:
I don't know about that. The only time I remember Bud Adams getting involved was when he wanted Vince because of the Texas connection. Jeff Fisher is the one making decisions and that is why Floyd Reese was fired because there was a power struggle between Reese and Fisher.
Click to expand...

I'm sure you can google Bud Adams and learn all about his micromanaging skills
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#130
#130
Hilarious


He had a tendency to micromanage the Oilers, which brought him considerable scrutiny since he had no background in the sport. For example, he required personal approval of any expenditures of $200 or over.
Click to expand...

The 1997 season in Memphis proved to be almost as disastrous as the prior years in the Astrodome had been. Whether it was out of disappointment at their own city's numerous failures to get professional football in its own right, or their longtime rivalry with and disdain for Nashville was the primary culprit, Memphians showed almost no interest in the Oilers. Nashvillians balked at traveling 210 miles to see "their" team, especially since Interstate 40 between the two cities was undergoing a major reconstruction near Memphis at the time. As a result, the Oilers played before some of the smallest NFL crowds since the 1950s. For many games, there appeared to be more visiting fans than Oiler fans.
Click to expand...

Bud Adams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
#132
#132
KB5252 said:
I'm not getting involved in this pissing contest but what exactly does this show about Bud Adams and his micromanaging skills.
Click to expand...

VolsnSkinsFan likes to post random quotes about the Oilers to prove his points...the success of the Redskins in the 80s, compare to the 8-8 records of the Oilers in Memphis, means that the Redskins are a much better team than the Titans right now. Obviously.
 
#133
#133
VolsNSkinsFan said:
Forget 1-3-5-10-20 years

How about we talk all time?


Redskins: 537-494-27
Titans: 363-371-6

Hmm looks like the Titans have more losses then wins overall, or what we like to call in the sports world a losing record, or below .500. Combine that with the fact you have goose egg SB rings= pretty mediocre orginization

BTW you never brought up how many HOFers the Titans have?
Click to expand...

So are you saying that the Raiders are organized well...
maybe I should repeat that so you answer it this time.
So are you saying that the Raiders are organized well...
 
#135
#135
VolsNSkinsFan said:
Organized so well to send you guys home after the 2002 AFC Championship game
Click to expand...

You make ridiculously awful arguments. Washington has not played in an NFC Championship game since 1991, and you are making fun of the Titans for losing in 2002. What's next? "Let's talk about the 80s!" Yeah, probably.

So you are saying the Raiders are a well-organized organization right now? That Al Davis is a perfectly sane owner and that Tennessee's new coach really is the "liar" that Davis called him? After all, if Kiffin failed in such a "well-organized" place like Oakland, he has no chance at Tennessee. We should check our excitement at the door right now if that is the case. Since he has talked all the time about how "dysfunctional" Oakland is, one of two things must be true. Either you agree with him, or you think he is completely just lying.
 
#136
#136
No where in your rambling incoherent response did you come close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. We are all dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul. A simple wrong would'a done just fine

Give it up, the Titans need to win a few SB to be considered an elite NFL organization
 
#137
#137
current status of the team notwithstanding, it is interesting to point out that in about the same time frame ole Buddy has had with the Oilers/Titans, Al Davis has led the Raiders to 3 Super Bowl victories. They've also been to the Super Bowl more recently than the amazing and glorious Titans.
 
#138
#138
I've already said I'm not talking about historically...I've already said that the Redskins have been better historically. Apparently neither of you read that or maybe you just skipped over it for some reason. I've also said that I am talking about recent history. I've essentially made this post before.
 
#139
#139
VKAman said:
Drafting/signing role players and trading picks/overpaying are two totally different ways of running a franchise. Judging by the 96-64 record versus the 76-84 record in a much weaker conference, and judging by exactly how many of those overpaid veterans actually lived up to their contracts, the Titans have done a much better job running their organization, and it's not even close. We spend less money and win more games with a younger team. Do you get that yet?
Click to expand...

There you go. The Redskins are known for overspending and underachieving. The Titans are ridiculed during free agency for not spending enough, and then they seem to keep getting better. That is how we have reached our current status, which is way above where the Redskins are. The Titans are a contender; the Redskins are not. There's a reason for that. It's not luck.
 
#141
#141
The Titans haven't been considered an actual contender this century by anyone that knows anything about football. No one was even considering them this year.

The redskins were getting more pub through week 12 than the undefeated Titans. That should tell you something.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#142
#142
volfanbill said:
The Titans haven't been considered an actual contender this century by anyone that knows anything about football. No one was even considering them this year.

The redskins were getting more pub through week 12 than the undefeated Titans. That should tell you something.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

The Titans probably got more pub with Pacman Jones than they do winning games. I don't think pub means anything, Washington is a bigger market than Nashville. I would say that the Titans got more pub than the skins when the playoffs started seeing as they were still playing.
 
#143
#143
volfanbill said:
The Titans haven't been considered an actual contender this century by anyone that knows anything about football. No one was even considering them this year.

The redskins were getting more pub through week 12 than the undefeated Titans. That should tell you something.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Aside from the fact that the Titans played in the Super Bowl this century (apparently they weren't a contender to win when they were playing in the game), that is such an epic lie that it really doesn't even deserve a response.
 
#145
#145
VKAman said:
Aside from the fact that the Titans played in the Super Bowl this century (apparently they weren't a contender to win when they were playing in the game), that is such an epic lie that it really doesn't even deserve a response.
Click to expand...

The new century started in 2001 genius.
 
#149
#149
VKAman said:
The Titans were easily a contender. No one will agree with you there.
Click to expand...

the fact that half the espn.com crew didn't even expect them to get out of their first playoff game proves that people will agree with me.

The fact that the fan poll went against them proves it even more.

The fact that the computer predicted them to get beat proves it even more.
 
#150
#150
volfanbill said:
The new century started in 2001 genius.
Click to expand...

...and since then we have had the best record in the league twice and have made the AFC Championship game another time. But no, no one ever considers the teams with home field advantage--or the final four teams left in the playoffs--contenders. Never.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top