68 in the NCAAT
32 in the NIT
16 spots in the CBI. I'm in favor of participating since 60% of the rotation is freshmen.
College Basketball Invitational - Wikipedia
We aren’t new to success. We are one of the top 30-35 programs of alltime. We didn’t have many NCAA appearances pre-Mears because only one team per conference went And Uk usually cheated their way in even back thenIf bad turnout affects your performance against inferior opponents then there's a problem. If anything it should make u want to blow them out to make those that didn't show up feel like they missed out. That being said playing in front of 5000 is a lot better than not playing at all. Trust me most of these kids would rather be playing that game than sitting on their couches. competing is competing.
we are UT, not Duke.... poo-pooing the NIT as something beneath us is asinine. just for reference since 2000 we have been to the NCAA's 11 times out of 20 opportunities. Before then we only had 11 appearances between 1967 and 1999. Success as a program s fairly new to UT men's BB. We have only 22 total appearances. That's almost as many as our NIT appearances (13) the best we have ever done in the NIT is third place. I think playing and possibly winning the NIT would be a good experience fo these guys. It's not the NCAA's but its playoff basketball. if it was beneath us we would have gotten booted i in the first round 4 of our last 5 appearances (the other time we got booted second round).
saying we are a top 30-35 program and then saying we aren't new to success is hilarious. Being top 30-35 all-time if like saying you I got a date to the prom but yeah not reserving a hotel room because shes probably not leaving with me anyway. That is not impressive at all. I never said we were terrible but we have not EVER had a successful mens basketball program for any appreciable period of time. We've never come close to winning the big dance and actually going to the dance is always in question year in year out. It's not a knock on anything just a statement of fact. Men's BB has never been a focus of this program. Winning and competing is always a focus but winning it all has never been a measure of success here. Most fo the success this program has had is very recent.We aren’t new to success. We are one of the top 30-35 programs of all time. We didn’t have many NCAA appearances pre-Mears because only one team per conference went And Uk usually cheated their way in even back then
Stop. 30-35 best all time out of 340 programs is pretty decent. No we aren’t a blue blood. But we aren’t Idaho or Southern either. We were hampered for so long being in UKs cheating shadow from the 30s thru 80s and especially back when only one team per conference went.saying we are a top 30-35 program and then saying we aren't new to success is hilarious. Being top 30-35 all-time if like saying you I got a date to the prom but yeah not reserving a hotel room because shes probably not leaving with me anyway. That is not impressive at all. I never said we were terrible but we have not EVER had a successful mens basketball program for any appreciable period of time. We've never come close to winning the big dance and actually going to the dance is always in question year in year out. It's not a knock on anything just a statement of fact. Men's BB has never been a focus of this program. Winning and competing is always a focus but winning it all has never been a measure of success here. Most fo the success this program has had is very recent.
saying we are a top 30-35 program and then saying we aren't new to success is hilarious. Being top 30-35 all-time if like saying you I got a date to the prom but yeah not reserving a hotel room because shes probably not leaving with me anyway. That is not impressive at all. I never said we were terrible but we have not EVER had a successful mens basketball program for any appreciable period of time. We've never come close to winning the big dance and actually going to the dance is always in question year in year out. It's not a knock on anything just a statement of fact. Men's BB has never been a focus of this program. Winning and competing is always a focus but winning it all has never been a measure of success here. Most fo the success this program has had is very recent.
NCAA Tournament Elite Eight 2010
NCAA Tournament Sweet Sixteen 1967, 1981, 2000, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2014, 2019
NCAA Tournament Round of 32 1976, 1977, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1999, 2000, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2014, 2018, 2019
NCAA Tournament Appearances 1967, 1976, 1977, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1989, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2014, 2018, 2019
NIT Final Four 1969, 1985
NIT Quarterfinals 1945, 1969, 1971, 1984, 1985
NIT Second Round 1969, 1971, 1984, 1985, 1990, 1992, 2012
NIT Tournament Appearances 1945, 1969, 1971, 1984, 1985, 1988, 1990, 1992, 1996, 2003, 2004, 2012, 2013
Conference Tournament Champions 1936, 1941, 1943, 1979
Conference Regular Season Champions 1936, 1941, 1943, 1967, 1972, 1977, 1982, 2000, 2008, 2018
Maryland during the 1971-1972 season went 27-5 and wound up winning the NIT Championship. Maryland had Tom McMillen and Len Elmore on the teamSee below for all time records, look at the 20s thru 60s and see how many NCAA visits we would've had if the "one team per conference" rule didnt exist
Tennessee Volunteers Index | College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com
If if was a fifth we'd all be drunk. Basketball in the 20's through 60's was an entirely different sport than we know today. Most of the players on our team wouldn't have been allowed in the arena unless they wee cleaning toilets back then. Games were played against high schools and junior colleges.See below for all time records, look at the 20s thru 60s and see how many NCAA visits we would've had if the "one team per conference" rule didnt exist
Tennessee Volunteers Index | College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com
Mears had a team ranked 8th in the country that didnt make the NCAAs, they werent playing high school teamsIf if was a fifth we'd all be drunk. Basketball in the 20's through 60's was an entirely different sport than we know today. Most of the players on our team wouldn't have been allowed in the arena unless they wee cleaning toilets back then. Games were played against high schools and junior colleges.
They weren't doing that in the 1920s and beyondIf if was a fifth we'd all be drunk. Basketball in the 20's through 60's was an entirely different sport than we know today. Most of the players on our team wouldn't have been allowed in the arena unless they wee cleaning toilets back then. Games were played against high schools and junior colleges.
it was hyperbole but it was a completely different game back then. We can theorycraft and talk about what should have been or could have been but we can only deal with reality. In whatever period there are rules in place to make the tourney we didn't fit whatever qualifications were relevant then so we didn't make it. But here today we judge success on making the dance right? Yeah, I exaggerated about the high school teams but at the same time those teams back then would have had problems beating modern Middle school teams. It was not in any way the same game 99% of the people on this board were not alive during those days. Heck I'm 45 and my mom wasn't alive during those days.They weren't doing that in the 1920s and beyond
it was hyperbole but it was a completely different game back then. We can theorycraft and talk about what should have been or could have been but we can only deal with reality. In whatever period there are rules in place to make the tourney we didn't fit whatever qualifications were relevant then so we didn't make it. But here today we judge success on making the dance right? Yeah, I exaggerated about the high school teams but at the same time those teams back then would have had problems beating modern Middle school teams. It was not in any way the same game 99% of the people on this board were not alive during those days. Heck I'm 45 and my mom wasn't alive during those days.
wow those jump shots lol. I had no idea sidearming was a thing. Thanks for making my point. They had more passes than dribbles per possession. almost ver single one of the shots they took would have been blocked. Every time a guy dribbled the ball down the court he was looking at the ball. It looked like elementary school kids playing. We will give them credit though the dribble has only existed about 40 years at this point. The balls had laces until 1937. And fully round balls were not introduced until 1948. This explains why the act of drilling as we know it seemed so alien to the guys in your video. You had to watch the ball when you dribble it because there's no telling where its gonna go. Try dribbling a volleyball or a kickball and you'll get what it was likely like for these guys. The game was totally different.