Is it hyperbole, though? Just because your post was well thought out and sensible doesn't erase the dozens of "You're stupid, Boo is a DB" replies to anyone who dared mention how good he looked on the other side of the ball.
Still, to your point, I guess I just don't see this stable of playmakers on the offensive side, especially at WR. I see Squirrel White. Bru doesn't appear to be coming back. Thornton never showed much promise and will be returning off an injury. He could still develop into the player we all hoped he could be, but in 3 years, he has 39 recs for 765 yds and 4 TDs. Leacock is an unknown, yet. The rest could develop, but haven't flashed to thus point, and there is no surer sign that they are difference makers than the young DBs we have and have recruited. And then we have Mike Matthews and Braylon Staley coming in, who we all have high hopes for.
Boo's size at DB is also a concern for me. Is he closer to 5-9 or 5-11? Let's call it 5-10 and 180 lbs. He's been most often projected as a safety, but that would be on the smaller side of that position. No doubt that we couldn't use his athleticism in our secondary. I think we'd all feel a lot more comfortable if he were closer to the neighborhood of 6-1, 205 lbs playing there. We currently have zero scholarship players on our roster at DB under 6', so it seems clear that this staff has a profile. The other DBs in this class, and the three already committed for 2025 all are at or above 6', too. So Boo stands out in that regard.
In the end, the staff is going to play him where they believe he has the most impact. If that is at DB, I'm fine with that. I just don't think it is sacrilege to have open discussion about the possibility/idea of him playing offense, though.
Your reply was polite and insightful, and the type that I'd prefer to engage with on the topic. But there are several who just want to walk all over anyone with an alternative theory, flexing their internet muscle because it challenges their critical thinking skills.