False equivalencies don't move you forward. The issue is whether long snappers should be recruited scholarship players or not. There is no evidence to support the idea that you get a better long snapper by offering him a scholarship. In fact, the evidence (oddly) points to the opposite. Therefore, don't waste a scholarship on one.
Pointing out that UT misevaluated a scholarship LB is a red herring that doesn't address the actual issue. But since there will inevitably be misevaluations, that's all the more reason to use your scholarships wisely.
Asking what generational talent we missed out on by offering Albright is just bizarre. But sure, let's just give out scholarships like candy because, you know, they wouldn't have gone to a generational talent anyway.
And yes, there were scholarship restrictions under Pruitt...the 85 total/25 initial counters. You still had to fit into those parameters, even if the NCAA hadn't hit us with further reductions yet.