Rasputin_Vol
"Slava Ukraina"
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 72,056
- Likes
- 39,844
Didn’t see local or state police in the article. However, straw purchasing is, and should be, illegal.
So if you buy 2 guns in one month your entire financial status should be laid bare for the atf to see? No.Again…. That’s a dumb thing to be upset about. I read the article, don’t care if it was a d or r.. It’s dumb, unemployment records do not require a sw. Providing records from one government agency to the next government agency is how most bureaucracies operate. Like when you get a drivers license in TN and get pulled over in CA. They can run your license to see if it’s valid.
Dumb thing to get upset about.
Dude, you are triggering the ATF to pull financial records (without a warrant) over suspected criminal activity. Why don't you understand how dangerous that is?Again…. That’s a dumb thing to be upset about. I read the article, don’t care if it was a d or r.. It’s dumb, unemployment records do not require a sw. Providing records from one government agency to the next government agency is how most bureaucracies operate. Like when you get a drivers license in TN and get pulled over in CA. They can run your license to see if it’s valid.
Dumb thing to get upset about.
I don’t think you understand how investigations work. I agree with some of your arguments, some are shaded to depict the officer in the worst possible light and lack facts, you actually just changed the facts in this one. This argument is dumb and you come off as a loon by jumping up and down when there is nothing to jump up and down about.Dude, you are triggering the ATF to pull financial records (without a warrant) over suspected criminal activity. Why don't you understand how dangerous that is?
Oh... I forgot... you are a damn blue lives matter cop.
May as well just allow the Feds to investigate any bank deposit to verify the serfs are not bringing home extra cash from selling unpasteurized milk or under the table home repairs.
I’m not talking about the article, long time gun collectors are being targeted because they buy some very expensive guns and perhaps a few cheap ones. The ATF will go after them because they buy the cheap ones. The ATF is assuming those guns will be sold strawman. They use that assumption to dig into personal financial information.Just like Ras, you add facts that are not included in the article.
link?I’m not talking about the article, long time gun collectors are being targeted because they buy some very expensive guns and perhaps a few cheap ones. The ATF will go after them because they buy the cheap ones. The ATF is assuming those guns will be sold strawman. They use that assumption to dig into personal financial information.
You want your financials invaded because of a gov assumption? I certainly don’t. As long as I’m buying guns legally and keeping them legally the atf has no business in my life and should not have access to my financial records.
WTF are you talking about? And you still didn't justify how getting financial records without a warrant is justifies for straw purchases or a murder case or an act of terrorism or ANY other reason. The 4th Amendment is pretty clear. Do they teach the 4th Amendment in police academy?I don’t think you understand how investigations work. I agree with some of your arguments, some are shaded to depict the officer in the worst possible light and lack facts, you actually just changed the facts in this one. This argument is dumb and you come off as a loon by jumping up and down when there is nothing to jump up and down about.
From the article... where am I changing the facts?I don’t think you understand how investigations work. I agree with some of your arguments, some are shaded to depict the officer in the worst possible light and lack facts, you actually just changed the facts in this one. This argument is dumb and you come off as a loon by jumping up and down when there is nothing to jump up and down about.
In one of the documents, an ATF agent emailed the FBI that a person suspected of straw purchasing or firearms trafficking needed to be put into the gun background check database. The agent wrote that “per TWC,” the man’s “reported wage earnings with the State of Texas do not appear to supply the financial means to afford the firearms purchased.”
In one of the documents, an ATF agent emailed the FBI that a person suspected of straw purchasing or firearms trafficking needed to be put into the gun background check database. The agent wrote that “per TWC,” the man’s “reported wage earnings with the State of Texas do not appear to supply the financial means to afford the firearms purchased.”
Dude, are they trading chickens for the guns? Don’t continue to make a dumb take even dumber.WTF are you talking about? And you still didn't justify how getting financial records without a warrant is justifies for straw purchases or a murder case or an act of terrorism or ANY other reason. The 4th Amendment is pretty clear. Do they teach the 4th Amendment in police academy?
Wage records that show extremely low income for a person purchasing an abnormal amount of firearms is a good indicator. It’s not probable cause, however If I had to guess, some of the guns the straw buyer purchased have ended up involved in a crime and ran through E-Trace which put the straw purchaser on investigators radar and an investigation ensued. I applaud this, this is how it’s supposed to work.From the article... where am I changing the facts?
The article didn’t say bank records, it said the state of Texas.
So some random federal bureaucrat can pull your financial records based on gun purchases? And you justify and defend this?
Y’all keep talking about warrantless searches…. Banking institutions require warrants, sans a SAR report, government agencies don’t necessarily. Tax returns are a different animal, but wage records are not banking records.I see people all the time that look like they can't afford their home or car they drive. Is that soon going to be worthy of a warrantless search of their finances?