Hobock
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2005
- Messages
- 21,063
- Likes
- 608
That is your objection? Because he's only been a pitching coach, but not a head coach? If all schools used your logic of only hiring coaches with previous college head coaching experience, there would be many schools without a head coach right now.
So does it make more sense to hire someone who has never coached at any level like Burke? I'm not sure if people realize this, but no proven coach is going to want to come to UT. And I never said Pharr was even going to get a serious look. What I said was I, personally, would love to see him get a look; because I think he could be very successful here.
That is your objection? Because he's only been a pitching coach, but not a head coach? If all schools used your logic of only hiring coaches with previous college head coaching experience, there would be many schools without a head coach right now.
So does it make more sense to hire someone who has never coached at any level like Burke? I'm not sure if people realize this, but no proven coach is going to want to come to UT. And I never said Pharr was even going to get a serious look. What I said was I, personally, would love to see him get a look; because I think he could be very successful here.
Not sure why that's so hard to see. No need to give the keys to someone who hasn't coached a single college game.
Believe me, I don't need to strengthen any argument between Pharr and Burke, because it's not close at all. You've already proven to me you don't know much if I have to try to argue with you about this.
Going from coaching 16-19 year olds in high school to coaching 18-23 year olds in college is not a stretch. Going from never coaching any team, to running a college program is ridiculous, plain and simple.