volfanbill
pack light and love heavy…
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2006
- Messages
- 44,664
- Likes
- 31,707
I forgot Patterson, I'm not sold on Stoops.
He's lost a lot of his edge, but he's still bottom tier top ten. You can't be that consistent for that long without doing something right. If you're going to go on and on and on and on and on and on and on about Bill Snyder's resume, Bob Stoops is doing more than Snyder. Stoops has never had a losing season, never missed a bowl game.
But the program he took over was a few million times better than Kansas St.
You really think that's comparable to Kansas St?
1985: 1-10
1986: 2-9
1987: 0-10-1
1988: 0-11
Those were the four years before Snyder. They the most loses among all D1 programs when he came to town.
and it took Snyder 5 years to go bowling. He's won 10+ game 9 times in 22 years. He's missed a bowl game 7 times. He has all of one big bowl win, the '97 Fiesta.
Stoops has never missed a bowl game, has 3 big bowl wins and a NC, and only 3 seasons has he failed to win 10+ games.
Oklahoma and Alabama both have great history and in state talent. Kansas St has neither. He took a winless team and won 11 games or more in 6 out of 7 years from 1997-2003.
who cares about history? What does what a team did in the 70s have to do with what they do in the aughts? absolutley nothing. both Saban and Stoops took over horrible teams and immediately turned them around and have always had them in the picture. Snyder took a really bad team and made them average. And kept them there. Ooooh.
Oklahoma and Alabama both have great history and in state talent. Kansas St has neither. He took a winless team and won 11 games or more in 6 out of 7 years from 1997-2003.
So to be a great coach you have to win a NC? There's probably about 30 schools out there were a coach, no matter how great can actually even have a shot at that.
With the record all 3 schools had before Snyder, Saban, or Stoops took over is basically irrelevant. Consistent losing recrods are just that...
OU bit the big one or a long time trying to find a suitable replacement to return to the glory years...Stoops. So, he successfully rebuilt.
KState never really had a program...Snyder built it. Retired. Came back and had to rebuild his handi work.
I won't say Stallings was the only post-Bryant coach of any account. Just the first to hang around that long. Perkins and Curry were successful, just didn't want to deal with all the crap. Stallings tired of it after a while but during his tenure was quite good. Between Stallings and Saban, Bama basically sucked. So, Saban had to rebuild. Prior to Saban, LSU was not a perrenial power. They had their moments and certainly the history, but not hte consistency they established under Saban. Les Miles success is due in part to Saban's work there.
Given...Bama and OU are steep in tradition and success, but it is not automatic to win just because it is Bama or whoever. Refer to coaches before them. But, being the schools they are, all 3 in major conferences, they all either quickly succeeded or re-emerged because they are winning D1 schools that can put you in the NFL.
All 3 are highly credible...Saban has just done it much better than the others, and has done it more than once, at more than one school. That makes it a track record with him, and also makes him the best.
That's what we have here. Snyder took over a team that hadn't won a game in two years! And built them into a top 15 program.
no love for Dantonio in this thread? I thought Vols fans were more knowledgeable than that.:hi: