bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 74,084
- Likes
- 50,295
I was going back and looking at old Ken Pom numbers. I think it's interesting, Trae Golden has a higher Assist Rate and Lower Turnover Rate than CJ Watson ever had. Also better Rebounding numbers.
The stat that is markedly better for CJ Watson was his 3pt percentage and steal %. But the two have relative comparable offensive ratings. I think the difference in steal % is more indicative of Martin's defensive philosophy than anything.
CJ's senior year was tremendous. It will be interesting to see how much Trae can improve. He's on track for another 150+ assist year this year, amazing considering this team's woeful offensive production. Assuming he can match that for a 3rd straight year that would put him Top 5 all-time at UT for assists.
Quite a statement for a player whose ability at the point has been questioned like it has.
I was going back and looking at old Ken Pom numbers. I think it's interesting, Trae Golden has a higher Assist Rate and Lower Turnover Rate than CJ Watson ever had. Also better Rebounding numbers.
The stat that is markedly better for CJ Watson was his 3pt percentage and steal %. But the two have relative comparable offensive ratings. I think the difference in steal % is more indicative of Martin's defensive philosophy than anything.
CJ's senior year was tremendous. It will be interesting to see how much Trae can improve. He's on track for another 150+ assist year this year, amazing considering this team's woeful offensive production. Assuming he can match that for a 3rd straight year that would put him Top 5 all-time at UT for assists.
Quite a statement for a player whose ability at the point has been questioned like it has.
Well part of the reason Watson's numbers jumped his senior year was going from Buzz ball to Pearl's system. I don't think Golden's numbers will have a significant jump his senior year unless Martin suddenly wants to run and gun.
Even if they don't have a significant jump, he's still on track to the Top 5 assist list.
The only stat I think Trae could significantly improve upon in this system is his 3 point percentage. That's good enough for me.
I'd like to see him work on his leadership skills, and his ability to feed the post, in addition to the outside shooting.
not sure how to quantify something like that.
Nothing wrong with his outside shot. As far as feeding the post, I think the big man has to make himself a good target for that to happen most of the time. Yeme and Kenny are pretty active on the boards and defensively but strong offinsive post-up players they are NOT.
Not a "true" PG
I think when people use "true" they are thinking of the prototypical PG ("pass-first" mentality). Scoring PGs have never been considered true PGs up until the NBA got so athletic in the last 10-15 years. We used to call scoring PGs "combo" guards because they had the ability to run the team, distribute and score. The thought of many on here has been if you were to put Trae in at the 2, he'd have consistently better scoring numbers because he's a scorer. Over time, he's definitely gotten a lot better on his decision-making and distribution. The great part is that we don't need him to be just a scorer because we need him to distribute and lead the team and he's doing an excellent job of that.
I'm not sure his scoring would be better at the 2 honestly. He's not super athletic, and definitely isn't overly quick...trying to score on guys 3-4 inches taller than him might get interesting.
And it's not like he's a great shooter.
But he definitely came to UT as a scorer. He obviously has been groomed to play the point and he's gotten better at distributing the ball, but he's still a scorer. I think the area he needed to improve the most this year is getting his teammates more involved and making them better
I'm not sure his scoring would be better at the 2 honestly. He's not super athletic, and definitely isn't overly quick...trying to score on guys 3-4 inches taller than him might get interesting.