SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 52,377
- Likes
- 65,043
I think the theory here is that costing the raising the price of your iPhone (for example) will force American companies to leave China. Will it be inflationary? Yep. Initially until AAPL and the others move to another sweat shop country like Vietnam or the Philippines, which should take a couple of years of staggering losses. Is it worth it? Absolutely.I don't see how making things cost more is really sticking it to China but ok
Uae numbers are a farce no matter who is in office.
Not sure I've ever been the one on here to approve of any foreign aid. I also don't approve of trillion dollar deficits, trillions in business "relief" and hundreds of untraceable billions to pay off big business. Maybe you do so vote maga
Subsidies are generally allocated within our budget. Bail-outs are off budget and add to the national debt.No. Please explain in detail as to how they are different with sources cited as to how soybeans caused inflation.
When you are done with that we can discuss the other successful policies of Trump that you didn’t address due to your cherry picking the soybeans.
Of all the waste that the government has every year, the farmers’ soybean boondoggle is one that I am extremely concerned about.
They're all added to the national debt. I would say stuff like medicare is off the books liabilities but at the end of the day the bills start to come in.Subsidies are generally allocated within our budget. Bail-outs are off budget and add to the national debt.
I agree his energy policy was effective. I can't think of another one that has any chance of long term success
You really think so? I don't think she's all that bright, but I do think she knows Puddinhead is atop the pole right now, and it takes an extreme act to knock him off. She wants to parlay that into continued hob nobbing with the hoi paloi. She wants to have dinner with Mike and Barry and other big name Dimwits.Jill is running the clown show right now and has been since 2020.
You really think so? I don't think she's all that bright, but I do think she knows Puddinhead is atop the pole right now, and it takes an extreme act to knock him off. She wants to parlay that into continued hob nobbing with the hoi paloi. She wants to have dinner with Mike and Barry and other big name Dimwits.
Fair enough. But I found it refreshing that he didn't walk in there on kneepads and kiss their ass. Wouldn't you love to tell Chucky Schumer or Mitch O'connel to their faces what you think of them? Trump actually DID IT. And you condemn him for it.Well, not contextually the best word choice. My bad. First to attack
That's all great unless you need to work with people. No one runs around their office insulting coworkers and is still productiveFair enough. But I found it refreshing that he didn't walk in there on kneepads and kiss their ass. Wouldn't you love to tell Chucky Schumer or Mitch O'connel to their faces what you think of them? Trump actually DID IT. And you condemn him for it.
I don't condemn anyone and certainly didn't condemn him for that.Fair enough. But I found it refreshing that he didn't walk in there on kneepads and kiss their ass. Wouldn't you love to tell Chucky Schumer or Mitch O'connel to their faces what you think of them? Trump actually DID IT. And you condemn him for it.
Fair enough. But I found it refreshing that he didn't walk in there on kneepads and kiss their ass. Wouldn't you love to tell Chucky Schumer or Mitch O'connel to their faces what you think of them? Trump actually DID IT. And you condemn him for it.
My favorite part is when he acts like he invented the use of UV light in the body. That’s been done before. However, the MSM absolutely lies about things he says. The best example is he never said Neo-Nazis are fine people. Biden still repeats that one and he’s far from alone in that."A question that probably some of you are thinking of if you’re totally into that world,” Trump began, clearly thinking the question himself, “So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous — whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light — and I think you said that that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you’re going to test that, too. It sounds interesting. And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it gets in the lungs, and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that.”
You're right. He didn't say that. Somehow, he said something worse.
Your assumption about TikTok is comical amd boomeresque. Quit while you're only considerably behind here, Space.
100% correct. If you are going to selectively limit content, then your moderation should be held responsible when it fails.I don't think any media company that has rules of what can and can't be said on their platform should have any 230 protections and should be fully liable for any illegal content on their platform..I think if this happened..most of these platform would be dissolved because they would he sued into oblivion or criminally charged with (child porn, human trafficking etc...).