Name one lie that any other politician ever said that killed 190,000 people? That's pathetic that you'd even try and defend that.
The lie killed 190k people? Mighty powerful lie. It's taking some people a long time to lie down and die from the lie. Is his lie killing people elsewhere too? This is the opposite argument of the hoax bs, same level of thought.
Depending on your incredibly vague definition here I can think of at least 4 conflicts that americans were involved with due to a lie.
Spanish American war. America accuse Spain of sinking a warship. 3k dead Americans, not sure how many Spanish and phillipines.
WWI germans sank a "civilian" liner full of weapons. Wilson lied about the weapons. 116k dead. Plenty more crippled or wounded, and about 5x more dead from disease over there. Then you can possibly add spanish flu round 2 in america often blamed on our participation in the war. Which was the worst part of the flu here.
WWII FDR and the brass knew about an attack on Pearl Harbor, if not the scale. And covered it up. 400k, plus 600k wounded.
Bush and the weapons of mass destruction for Iraq 2. That's about 10k. Plenty of wounded there too.
Then you get Obama JV'ing ISIS, plenty of dead from that. Reagan "unknowingly" gave money and weapons to Iran.
And these are just the lies we know about regarding conflicts. Probably plenty of others we dont know about that lead to plenty of Americans dead.
Heck a lot of the atrocities we did to the Native Americans were based on lies. Including Lincolns order of mass executions was done after a federal judge admitted he knew the ones he found guilty were innocent.
Then you get all the fun tests the government has done on it's people via lies. The incredibly racist Tuskegee trials. There were some others out on the west coast too.
Hilarys Benghazi, but at this point what does it matter anyway.
Trump is dumb politician because he is a relatively honest politician. And he is only an honest politician because of the bar that's been set and how dumb he is. Any other politician would have lied about. We know that because we saw that.
You only care about this lie because it's in your face by the opposition. You would rather attack the messenger on the lying part than deal with the message itself. Which is strange because it also helps your partisan arguments.