Trump Leading Witness Revenge Acts

[BreatheUT]

Vindman, a star Trump impeachment witness, escorted out of the White House

You do realize he can hire and fire who he wants in his administration. These are with cause demotions. Even Tulsi Gabbard agreed. Your threads are teenage. Can you tell us whose the next up and coming pop star?

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

As Commander In Chief , they also didn’t have a choice being in the military . Just because they did what they thought in their minds was right , doesn’t mean the boss has to keep them in their same positions . I wouldn’t , would you ? How would your job be if you and your boss were paranoid of each other everyday and there was no trust at all between either of you ? I would want out of that position as much as my boss would want me out . The key to all of this as it is with any and all jobs is the word “ Boss “ . If that isn’t your title , you follow what the rules are set by the guy that does have that title .

It's sad that you have to even explain this to some. Just because a person is in a military uniform they're not subject to criticism for what they do. Vindman knew his day was coming. He was directed to another part where maybe he want be a danger of committing treason next time around.

 

[37L1]

Seriously? You're talking about a petty, vindictive, narcissistic, and selfish child.

What's your point?

That doesn't sound like a "lame duck" to me, does it to you?

Make up your mind.

 

[37L1]

Not a well though out opinion is the problem. Opinions should be formed with some basis of fact involved and not simply pulled out of one's ass.

That's where luther does his best work, though.

 

[luthervol]

Enough opinions want be changing in your favor anytime soon I'm afraid. Deal w/it.

That's certainly the big unanswered question.

 

[luthervol]

What's your point?

That doesn't sound like a "lame duck" to me, does it to you?

Make up your mind.

WTH????
I'll restate my point, I'm guessing you must have misread the first time.
Take Trump's behavior over the 48 hour period following the 52-48 "innocent" vote.
Now project that onto him as a lame duck if he is reelected.

 

[37L1]

WTH????
I'll restate my point, I'm guessing you must have misread the first time.
Take Trump's behavior over the 48 hour period following the 52-48 "innocent" vote.
Now project that onto him as a lame duck if he is reelected.

Do even know what "lame duck" means?

Think of a duck that can't walk or fly well, or think of a politician that is weak and without power to do what he would like because he is between elections and can't run again. Does that fit your description?

 

[lawgator1]

 

[luthervol]

Do even know what "lame duck" means?

Think of a duck that can't walk or fly well, or think of a politician that is weak and without power to do what he would like because he is between elections and can't run again. Does that fit your description?

Of course I know what it is, that's why I used the term.
When Trump has nothing to lose, and no longer has the full support of republicans in congress, when all he has reaming is the dwindling zombie horde that still worships every word he mumbles and tweets.................

 

[0nelilreb]

View attachment 260253

that’s hilarious! Who’s the interviewer , the glasses are throwing me off ? Is that wolf Blitzer

 

[37L1]

Of course I know what it is, that's why I used the term.
When Trump has nothing to lose, and no longer has the full support of republicans in congress, when all he has reaming is the dwindling zombie horde that still worships every word he mumbles and tweets.................

I now know what you are trying to say but you are doing it wrong.

Come on luther, that is NOT how the term "lame duck" is used in politics. Go ahead research it and prove otherwise.

 

[vols40]

Umm Trump appointed them and championed them. So what the hell are you talking about. Then you brought up Bolton. Which makes no sense. Yea he’s a **** bag. But who gave him a job?

Still not a lib? Lol you people are so easy to expose. And if you have a problem with firing someone who you have hired then you have never had the opportunity to hire someone. Be gone lib and enjoy the winning the next 5 years as well as more idiotic hacks to lose their jobs

 

[0nelilreb]

Of course I know what it is, that's why I used the term.
When Trump has nothing to lose, and no longer has the full support of republicans in congress, when all he has reaming is the dwindling zombie horde that still worships every word he mumbles and tweets.................

I know you understand the determination of the left but I really think you underestimate what the constant berating and 24/7 MSM cycles from the left on the GOP is doing as far as forcing them to circle their wagons .

 

[volfanhill]

Still not a lib? Lol you people are so easy to expose. And if you have a problem with firing someone who you have hired then you have never had the opportunity to hire someone. Be gone lib and enjoy the winning the next 5 years as well as more idiotic hacks to lose their jobs

Bolton was a known dbag when Trump gave him the job.

 

[luthervol]

I now know what you are trying to say but you are doing it wrong.

Come on luther, that is NOT how the term "lame duck" is used in politics. Go ahead research it and prove otherwise.

It's used as I intended.
Look at how incredibly childish, petty, and unprofessional he is now - while he is running for reelection and has the support of the republican party. Now envision him 4 years from now, with none of those things to provide any motivation for restraint in control.
He will be stark raving mad.

 

[37L1]

It's used as I intended.
Look at how incredibly childish, petty, and unprofessional he is now - while he is running for reelection and has the support of the republican party. Now envision him 4 years from now, with none of those things to provide any motivation for restraint in control.
He will be stark raving mad.

That is not a "lame duck."

But go ahead and double down on stupid.

Do really think Trump operates under such constraints anyway?

 

[luthervol]

I know you understand the determination of the left but I really think you underestimate what the constant berating and 24/7 MSM cycles from the left on the GOP is doing as far as forcing them to circle their wagons .

I truly think the right has been intentionally conditioned to perceive that there is constant berating and a 24/7 MSM liberal cycle.
For the life of me, I don't see it - and we pretty much live in the same world.

 

[0nelilreb]

It's used as I intended.
Look at how incredibly childish, petty, and unprofessional he is now - while he is running for reelection and has the support of the republican party. Now envision him 4 years from now, with none of those things to provide any motivation for restraint in control.
He will be stark raving mad.

Did you realize before or after you typed this , that it will end up on the same dead pile as .. He’s going to start WW3, he’s Hiter, he’s Stalin , he’s Mao Zedong, he’s recruited more radicals than ISSIS ?

 

[vols40]

First off, he's impeached regardless of removal and that will never go away. Second, the House had ample evidence to not only warrant impeachment but they had enough to warrant removal as well. The only reason removal didn't happen was because the "jury" was rigged.

And the fact he was acquitted means the impeachment wasn't warranted. Or maybe you libs will understand this he was acquitted and there is no other place for you to appeal.
But by all means do the American people a favor and run it back in the next couple months. Should be easy with all your claims of wrongdoing by the President. Just be mindful the Senate which you don't control will be doing it's own investigations. Hunter, Joe, Schift, Vindman, Eric, Vindman, and his lawyer buddy are on notice.

 

[0nelilreb]

I truly think the right has been intentionally conditioned to perceive that there is constant berating and a 24/7 MSM liberal cycle.
For the life of me, I don't see it - and we pretty much live in the same world.

Even when you are given inks , shown the actual words they use , you still claim it isn’t propaganda and they are just being honest . There’s been more than enough evidence from , CNN , MSNBC, CBS, NBC , WaPo and the NYTs . You just chose to see it from a purely left leaning perspective and therefore is justified . The slanted articles are only slanted if ... they aren’t leaning the way you think and away from your ideology.

 

[vols40]

Bwaaaaa haaaaaaa haaaaaa.



You lose

Coug also failed to mention that the ICIG testimony transcript taken down in the bunker of the house is still being kept private. Also failed to mention this testimony is the only bunker testimony not included in the House proceedings. Why was this not made public? Why is this? We will know when the House is flipped back. It's also worth noting that not one of the "rigged jury" Senate proceedings were held in a private bunker.
The president was right all this winning is difficult. Lol

 

[luthervol]

That is not a "lame duck."

But go ahead and double down on stupid.

Do really think Trump operates under such constraints anyway?

Of course he operates under those constraints. Not well, not as a normal person, not in a remotely presidential way - put they are constraints.
That's the point I'm making, no one has less reason for constraint than a lame duck politician; they've pretty much lost everything that would serve as a constraint. (except for moral decency, integrity, and a conscious - all things we know Trump lacks)

 

[luthervol]

Did you realize before or after you typed this , that it will end up on the same dead pile as .. He’s going to start WW3, he’s Hiter, he’s Stalin , he’s Mao Zedong, he’s recruited more radicals than ISSIS ?

You may wish to start a separate pile. I don't think I've ever once said any of those things. Put mine in the pile with those that say he is a horrendously despicable human and is greatly damaging the America fabric. (I'll stand by those two)

 

[vols40]

Do even know what "lame duck" means?

Think of a duck that can't walk or fly well, or think of a politician that is weak and without power to do what he would like because he is between elections and can't run again. Does that fit your description?

Bowlbrother approves of this post

 

[luthervol]

Even when you are given inks , shown the actual words they use , you still claim it isn’t propaganda and they are just being honest . There’s been more than enough evidence from , CNN , MSNBC, CBS, NBC , WaPo and the NYTs . You just chose to see it from a purely left leaning perspective and therefore is justified . The slanted articles are only slanted if ... they aren’t leaning the way you think and away from your ideology.

Exactly. From a right perspective, the middle is left.