Trump sues big tech

#4
#4
K-town Vol Fan said:
When I read news sources like this, it makes me think there should be even more censorship. Its no wonder yall are brainwashed.
Click to expand...

I can think of multiple other sources that get to the point without dripping with overt partisan poo. I'll post a couple when I get to where I'm going.
 
#11
#11
This lawsuit has about as much of a chance at succeeding as his 60 election fraud lawsuits - zero, nada, zilch.
But Trump will use it to grift his supporters (suckers) and fundraise off it - the more the pansy whines, the more his supporters empty their wallets for a lost cause.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrorange211, Septic, samanderson and 4 others
#12
#12
OrangeTsar said:
Tell me, what makes CNN a quality outlet worth investing time following?
Click to expand...

I don't follow them. I find 90% of information/Newsertainment outlets to be devoid of value and simply pandering to their audiences.

Your turn.
 
#13
#13
AshG said:
I don't follow them. I find 90% of information/Newsertainment outlets to be devoid of value and simply pandering to their audiences.

Your turn.
Click to expand...
Please make your recommendation then for a reputable and objective news source currently operating in the US today and we can discuss
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#14
#14
TN Ribs said:
This lawsuit has about as much of a chance at succeeding as his 60 election fraud lawsuits - zero, nada, zilch.
But Trump will use it to grift his supporters (suckers) and fundraise off it - the more the pansy whines, the more his supporters empty their wallets for a lost cause.
Click to expand...
Right, you have convinced me to instead send my money to BLM so they can buy even more mansions. Thanks! Much gratitude
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rocky_Top_Vol13, SlipKidVol, -GiveHim6- and 4 others
#15
#15
Someone needs more attention.

And yes, this is the opposite of what he argued in the lawsuit about blocking followers on Twitter.

 
#16
#16
Velo Vol said:
Someone needs more attention.

And yes, this is the opposite of what he argued in the lawsuit about blocking followers on Twitter.

Click to expand...

Not to say he may have a bad argument. Idk didn't read it but being a user vs a platform are different things. Being a town square vs someone speaking at it don't carry the same requirements. I don't think a different view means it is contradictory
 
#19
#19
utvols88 said:
Not to say he may have a bad argument. Idk didn't read it but being a user vs a platform are different things. Being a town square vs someone speaking at it don't carry the same requirements. I don't think a different view means it is contradictory
Click to expand...
Remember that Trump was successfully sued for blocking people on Twitter. That sounds like that puts it in squarely in first amendment territory
 
#20
#20
Big change from a guy whose whole claim to fame was making mean tweets. How the turntables...
 
#22
#22
OrangeTsar said:
Right, you have convinced me to instead send my money to BLM so they can buy even more mansions. Thanks! Much gratitude
Click to expand...
You are very welcome, it's nice to see there is finally some clarity in your line of thought. Let me know if you need anything else, I aim to please.
 
#23
#23
OrangeTsar said:
Remember that Trump was successfully sued for blocking people on Twitter. That sounds like that puts it in squarely in first amendment territory
Click to expand...

That was because of his standing as the President of the United States and his usage of the platform as an extension of his office.
 
#25
#25
AshG said:
That was because of his standing as the President of the United States and his usage of the platform as an extension of his office.
Click to expand...
Of course. But that means that if the President can be forced by the court to forgo an action on a privately owned platform, then that platform can’t then claim to be free from government direction or legal jurisdiction. Twitter cannot have it both ways.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top