Trump sues big tech

#51
#51
There is no Constitutional right to have a Facebook page. There is no federal law requiring Facebook to give you a page.

End of lawsuit.
 
#56
#56
This is America. You can sue for anything, even spilling hot coffee in your own lap. And as we see with the wacky rulings that we see almost daily it should be clear that all it takes is finding the right judge on the right day and you can get at least an initial ruling in your favour. So why not try?
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#58
#58
Why does Trump need to raise money for this? He has billions and billions. Just ask him.
 
#59
#59
Trump is a clown and I don’t get the support for him. That takes nothing away from the fact the media had and currently has it out for him.

Just objectively speaking in a vacuum - Trump is a buffoon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13 and Rickyvol77
#60
#60
rjd970 said:
Trump is a clown and I don’t get the support for him. That takes nothing away from the fact the media had and currently has it out for him.

Just objectively speaking in a vacuum - Trump is a buffoon.
Click to expand...

Does the media hate him because he's earned it. That's the question.

(The answer is a resounding yes.)
 
#62
#62
lawgator1 said:
Does the media hate him because he's earned it. That's the question.

(The answer is a resounding yes.)
Click to expand...
You can not like someone and still be able to properly do your job. The media absolutely failed on that when it came to Trump and let their emotions take control

If you don't personally like one of your clients do you give them less of an effort?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40 and Orangeslice13
#63
#63
lawgator1 said:
Why does Trump need to raise money for this? He has billions and billions. Just ask him.
Click to expand...

Why does dementia Joe funnel money through s-corps to avoid taxes when everyone should be paying their fair share?
 
#64
#64
rjd970 said:
Trump is a clown and I don’t get the support for him. That takes nothing away from the fact the media had and currently has it out for him.
Click to expand...
Why would Facebook/Twitter hate Trump? He was great for business.
 
#65
#65
Velo Vol said:
There is no Constitutional right to have a Facebook page. There is no federal law requiring Facebook to give you a page.

End of lawsuit.
Click to expand...

There was a similar issue in the early 1900s where companies would buy public land, like the town square. This was where people held public forums. They bought the property to prevent the town citizens from meeting. The case went to court and ruled against the company that was preventing people to meet publicly. Heard this from a lawyer who discussing facebooks sensorship. He was providing some history about private companies blocking free speech
 
  • Like
Reactions: -GiveHim6- and W.TN.Orange Blood
#67
#67
Volgolfer1618 said:
There was a similar issue in the early 1900s where companies would buy public land, like the town square. This was where people held public forums. They bought the property to prevent the town citizens from meeting. The case went to court and ruled against the company that was preventing people to meet publicly. Heard this from a lawyer who discussing facebooks sensorship. He was providing some history about private companies blocking free speech
Click to expand...
Link?
 
#68
#68
rjd970 said:
Trump is a clown and I don’t get the support for him. That takes nothing away from the fact the media had and currently has it out for him.

Just objectively speaking in a vacuum - Trump is a buffoon.
Click to expand...
He is. But the rank and file right was starving for ANYONE who would actually stand up for them and not play footsie with the left. And Trump fit the bill. The establishment GOP has no one to blame but themselves for offering up the McCains, Rommneys, and Ryans
 
#69
#69
Velo Vol said:
Link?
Click to expand...

I couldn't find it. It's from a podcast from Robert Barns, he was discussing tech's sensoring and gave some history about free speech in public square. He said it was about companies preventing unions from gathering in the public square to sign more memebers and to discuss unionizing. the companies bought the square and claimed the unions were tresspassing
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13 and AshG
#70
#70
Volgolfer1618 said:
I couldn't find it. It's from a podcast from Robert Barns, he was discussing tech's sensoring and gave some history about free speech in public square. He said it was about companies preventing unions from gathering in the public square to sign more memebers and to discuss unionizing. the companies bought the square and claimed the unions were tresspassing
Click to expand...
An obvious difference is unlike physical property, you can set up as many alternative websites as you want.
 
#71
#71
Volgolfer1618 said:
There was a similar issue in the early 1900s where companies would buy public land, like the town square. This was where people held public forums. They bought the property to prevent the town citizens from meeting. The case went to court and ruled against the company that was preventing people to meet publicly. Heard this from a lawyer who discussing facebooks sensorship. He was providing some history about private companies blocking free speech
Click to expand...

Fact.
 
#74
#74
Can we sign on even if we don't have social media to get a cut of the proceeds of he wins?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top