Trump Supporters Gathering in D.C. - Mayor Readies for Those ‘Seeking Confrontation’

Are you serious?
This is where your mind led you? Or should I say, where your mind was led for you?
You can't show me anything that proves we had a free and fair election. As far as insurrection goes, there's no difference in violent protests that went on all this past year and what happened at the capitol. Unless you're willing to call all protests insurrection, you can shut the f#ck up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
You can't show me anything that proves we had a free and fair election. As far as insurrection goes, there's no difference in violent protests that went on all this past year and what happened at the capitol. Unless you're willing to call all protests insurrection, you can shut the f#ck up.
It’s Official: The Election Was Secure
These government officials, judges, and elected leaders, overwhelmingly Republican, have publicly acknowledged confidence in the November election.

Read it. It's a pretty lengthy and all encompassing list.
 
Feds Back Off Claim That Capitol Rioters Intended To ‘Capture And Assassinate Elected Officials’

On Friday, federal prosecutors backed off their claim that the government had “strong evidence” that showed the unruly mob that stormed the U.S. Capitol last week intended “to capture and assassinate elected officials.”

The initial allegation was made in a court filing supporting the detention of Jacob Anthony Chansley, also known as Jake Angeli, as he awaits trial. The 33-year-old Arizona man reportedly calls himself “QAnon Shaman.” The Department of Justice identified him as “one of the leaders and mascots of QAnon,” which prosecutors described as a group that “preaches debunked and fictitious anti-government conspiracy theories that a deep state is out to take down the current administration.”

The Washington Post reported, however, that Assistant U.S. Attorney Todd Allison later asked that the line alleging rioters sought “to capture and assassinate elected officials” be stricken from the record. Allison said it “may very well be appropriate at a trial” but could “mislead the court by discussing the strength of any specific evidence” related to Chansley’s intentions.



Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Michael Sherwin, the head of the investigation, had clarified earlier on Friday that there was “no direct evidence at this point of kill-capture teams and assassination.”

Feds Back Off Claim That Capitol Rioters Intended To ‘Capture And Assassinate Elected Officials’
 
Feds Back Off Claim That Capitol Rioters Intended To ‘Capture And Assassinate Elected Officials’

On Friday, federal prosecutors backed off their claim that the government had “strong evidence” that showed the unruly mob that stormed the U.S. Capitol last week intended “to capture and assassinate elected officials.”

The initial allegation was made in a court filing supporting the detention of Jacob Anthony Chansley, also known as Jake Angeli, as he awaits trial. The 33-year-old Arizona man reportedly calls himself “QAnon Shaman.” The Department of Justice identified him as “one of the leaders and mascots of QAnon,” which prosecutors described as a group that “preaches debunked and fictitious anti-government conspiracy theories that a deep state is out to take down the current administration.”

The Washington Post reported, however, that Assistant U.S. Attorney Todd Allison later asked that the line alleging rioters sought “to capture and assassinate elected officials” be stricken from the record. Allison said it “may very well be appropriate at a trial” but could “mislead the court by discussing the strength of any specific evidence” related to Chansley’s intentions.



Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Michael Sherwin, the head of the investigation, had clarified earlier on Friday that there was “no direct evidence at this point of kill-capture teams and assassination.”

Feds Back Off Claim That Capitol Rioters Intended To ‘Capture And Assassinate Elected Officials’

Wonder what's with the 20k troops?
 
Feds Back Off Claim That Capitol Rioters Intended To ‘Capture And Assassinate Elected Officials’

On Friday, federal prosecutors backed off their claim that the government had “strong evidence” that showed the unruly mob that stormed the U.S. Capitol last week intended “to capture and assassinate elected officials.”

The initial allegation was made in a court filing supporting the detention of Jacob Anthony Chansley, also known as Jake Angeli, as he awaits trial. The 33-year-old Arizona man reportedly calls himself “QAnon Shaman.” The Department of Justice identified him as “one of the leaders and mascots of QAnon,” which prosecutors described as a group that “preaches debunked and fictitious anti-government conspiracy theories that a deep state is out to take down the current administration.”

The Washington Post reported, however, that Assistant U.S. Attorney Todd Allison later asked that the line alleging rioters sought “to capture and assassinate elected officials” be stricken from the record. Allison said it “may very well be appropriate at a trial” but could “mislead the court by discussing the strength of any specific evidence” related to Chansley’s intentions.



Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Michael Sherwin, the head of the investigation, had clarified earlier on Friday that there was “no direct evidence at this point of kill-capture teams and assassination.”

Feds Back Off Claim That Capitol Rioters Intended To ‘Capture And Assassinate Elected Officials’


So they'll throw in the “to capture and assassinate elected officials” line during the editorial phases of the trial to impress a jury, but delete from the charges so he won't walk because they fail to make the case. Nice way to slander someone without making it official.
 
Luther, why would you think the government is deploying 25k troops to our nation's capitol? I've been around a long time and I've never seen anything like this. Are those troops there to protect Americans or protect against Americans?

You didn't ask me, but I'll make a guess. I bet they're trying to prevent an angry mob from overrunning the Capitol while trying to stop a largely ceremonial function that won't be overturned. I haven't been around as long as you, but I think there's some precedent for that. Why do you think they are there?
 
Last edited:
You didn't ask me, but I'll make a guess. I bet they're trying to prevent an angry mob from overruning the Capitol while trying to stop a largely ceremonial function that won't be overturned. I haven't been around as long as you, but I think there's some precedent for that. Why do you think they are there?
25,000 troops to protect the capitol from republican protesters? Are you kidding me?
 
A show of force obviously. The democrats are pissed off because the house was attacked. Your overlords aren't going to allow that kind of behavior so they counter attack with overwhelming force.

At least you're admitting it. Is there a specific number of troops you'd be okay with to prevent another attack?
 
gallery_medium.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: dovervolz and AM64
It is very strange indeed. It's as if the Military is propping up and protecting a politician and his supporters who have successfully stolen a presidential election. But, we all know that could never happen in America.
Hey look Q, bigfoot.

Come on guys, you're embarrassing yourselves.
 

VN Store



Back
Top