BigOrangeMojo
The Member in Miss December
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2017
- Messages
- 24,111
- Likes
- 56,945
There are two aspects of this post, which make you appear out of touch :Paying double is a small price to pay to avoid “mean tweets”.
There are two aspects of this post, which make you appear out of touch :
1) Inflation was going to sharply rise, even if Trump had been re-elected. Trump's fiscal policy was highly inflationary. His budget proposals were expansionary in nature, at a time when the economy didn't need it. We were experiencing economic growth and near full employment in 2018. Trump signed irresponsible spending bills into law.
2) If you really believe that Trump's conduct on Twitter was why he lost the election, then just like Trump, you are oblivious to reality.
Trump Sells All 4,500 of his $99 digital NFT trading cards in a single day – as it's revealed his money-spinner is being run out of a one-story building in upstate New York and a Utah strip mall
Trump sells all 4,500 of his $99 digital NFT trading cards in a single day | Daily Mail Online
You don't know what you are talking about. Trump's spending was out of control and reckless. It contributed heavily to the rise of inflation.Trump is an arrogant pompous ass but his policies are infinitely better than anything a dim promotes. Number 1 is just bs. Even if it were true the dementia Joe administration doubles down on stupidity to make it worse.
If I had people hate me the level of Trump hatred, or if I was his advisor, I'd suggest he go the Brian Bosworth route and sell merchandise against himself to his haters. Nothing better than people paying me to hate me.Funny you mention that - if someone made NFTs mocking Trump I bet they would sell out and it would be just as dumb though not as embarrassing to the seller.
Two things are wrong with that ....
Two things are wrong with that ....
1) Who cares what he would do? He's not going to be the President of the United States again.
2) The 1st Amendment applies to members of the government as well. As long as those members of the government aren't suppressing the speech, or censoring it ... they are free to describe it, however they want. Just like there was nothing wrong with Trump going on Twitter and describing reports of collusion between his 2016 campaign and the Russian government as misinformation while he was President.