why what you say here might be true? Might it be because trump is a dishonest, shady, untrustworthy moron whose made a complete fool of himself since he get elected; might it be because he is not in any way fit to be president?
And now you say: But obama was just as bad. Uh, not even close. To run down the many ways trump is not fit to be president would take an hour--and i've already done it. And it is all pretty obvious. He lies, he cheats people, he has impugned our democratic institutions with stupid comments about nonexistent voting fraud, he doesn't read and he's stupid, he says stupid things, he's got crackpots for advisors, the list goes on.
Democrats didn't like bush either, but bush was lincoln compared to this clown--at least until he lied to the american people to start the iraq war. Most republicans are inimical to democrats because they embrace bad un-american //policies//--stiff everybody in every way, screw the environment and health and worker/women's rights, etc. With trump you get all of that bad policy--at an extreme level--and he's a really bad character: Untrustworthy, corrupt and possessing dangerously autocratic tendencies. Thinks he doesn't need to follow laws and protocols--has ignored conflict of interest rules, blatantly; has not released his taxes. A man who tells massive lies--constantly--and then lashes out at the media that exposes his lies with all his "fake news" bull$hit is dangerous and sinister. He's a mafia president. He just put his family //party planner// in charge of hud's largest district in the country--a woman who knows nothing about housing. But trump owns properties in new york that get large sums of money from hud.
Yahoos may not realize it, in fact they've been conditioned by anti-democratic republicans not to realize it, but the mainstream media serves a very important purpose, which, writ large, is to protect vital american institutions from people like donald trump.