TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

Obviously that is your hope which is shared by the republicans whose President is about to be skewered. Standard defense... when you can't stand the message, go after the messenger.

Odds of happening: Nil.

Y'all are really getting goofy now. Like off the rails nuts.

It's a Mission Creep...REGARDLESS if you hate or love Trump, everyone knows that...

Take a quick listen to this, it's shady mission creep tactics.

LISTEN: Former Federal Prosecutor SIDNEY POWELL Weighs In on Robert Mueller’s Questionable Investigation | 105.9 FM and AM 630—Where Washington Comes To Talk | WMAL-AF


COME%20ON%20MAN.jpg
 
I'm asking a genuine question. Do you have the answers?

And do you not see the irony of your response? You went after me and the Repubs as opposed to the message. I literally just asked you an honest question, which you sidestepped by calling me off the rails. lol Project much?

You're making a huge leap of faith based upon the political shenanigans of Rep. Nunes - who has already proven himself 100% shame flake. Just sit back, take a deep breath and see what happens. Most of it is likely pure bluster... If not, we probably won't see the fallout anyway, as it involves the super secretive FISA court.

Muellers investigation will keep on trucking.

Sorry Charlie.

From CNN

The document alleges that the FISA judge who signed off on surveillance warrants for members of Trump's team during the campaign was not given full information about the dossier that was used in at least one application, including that it was paid for by the Democratic sources, CNN reported Saturday.

CNN first reported last April that the dossier was used as part of the justification with the secret FISA court to monitor the communications of former Trump foreign policy adviser Carter Page.

While the FBI used information beyond the dossier to support the court application, the dossier was cited in footnotes to specific allegations, according to current and former US officials briefed on the matter. Steele was considered by the bureau to be a credible FBI source, so using the material was not out of line with FBI practice, according to the current and former officials.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
You're making a huge leap of faith based upon the political shenanigans of Rep. Nunes - who has already proven himself 100% shame flake. Just sit back, take a deep breath and see what happens. Most of it is likely pure bluster... If not, we probably won't see the fallout anyway, as it involves the super secretive FISA court.

Muellers investigation will keep on trucking.

Sorry Charlie.

From CNN

The document alleges that the FISA judge who signed off on surveillance warrants for members of Trump's team during the campaign was not given full information about the dossier that was used in at least one application, including that it was paid for by the Democratic sources, CNN reported Saturday.

CNN first reported last April that the dossier was used as part of the justification with the secret FISA court to monitor the communications of former Trump foreign policy adviser Carter Page.

While the FBI used information beyond the dossier to support the court application, the dossier was cited in footnotes to specific allegations, according to current and former US officials briefed on the matter. Steele was considered by the bureau to be a credible FBI source, so using the material was not out of line with FBI practice, according to the current and former officials.

Oh, I am definitely operating on a hypothetical. The thing is, all I've seen is:

A LOT of guffawing per the Dem dirty deeds done dirt cheap. The ones doing the accusing per dirty deeds in FISA court asking that evidence be released publicly. The ones that it could hurt badly (Dems) scurrying to keep the evidence hidden...

So, change my verbiage from "when" to "if". How will you feel if the entire investigation against Trump is halted, all current supposed evidence is tossed out, and nothing can happen to Trump because the original warrants were dirty and everything that came after was deemed inadmissible?

How would you react if Obama, Hillary, and his DoJ were shown to be traitorous?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Familiar with Rosenstein? Is he complicit too in your fantasy world?

Rosenstein's worked in and around all of them for years, Mueller, Comey and nasty unethical pit bull Weismann (whom many legal scholars feel he should have been disbarred year ago)...Clinton Foundation attorney too who all ran in same Rosenstein circles...LOL, plus McCabe's soon early retirement (hummm?)....and the others they had to kick off and/or demote those outside the investigating team...you're either naive or are receiving really bad facts if you believe in an impartial Department of Justice and FBI.

My goal is to always be factual, as much as possible, that said...I do believe at a minimum, Rosenstein was put in a tough spot since he was not explicitly implicated as having a conflict of interest.

Make no mistake, we all know it's a Mission Creep, no matter how one chooses to 'slice-n-dice' it.

Read this:

Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice: Sidney Powell: 9781612541495: Amazon.com: Books
 
Last edited:
You're making a huge leap of faith based upon the political shenanigans of Rep. Nunes - who has already proven himself 100% shame flake. Just sit back, take a deep breath and see what happens. Most of it is likely pure bluster... If not, we probably won't see the fallout anyway, as it involves the super secretive FISA court.

Muellers investigation will keep on trucking.

Sorry Charlie.

From CNN

The document alleges that the FISA judge who signed off on surveillance warrants for members of Trump's team during the campaign was not given full information about the dossier that was used in at least one application, including that it was paid for by the Democratic sources, CNN reported Saturday.

CNN first reported last April that the dossier was used as part of the justification with the secret FISA court to monitor the communications of former Trump foreign policy adviser Carter Page.

While the FBI used information beyond the dossier to support the court application, the dossier was cited in footnotes to specific allegations, according to current and former US officials briefed on the matter. Steele was considered by the bureau to be a credible FBI source, so using the material was not out of line with FBI practice, according to the current and former officials.

LOLOLOLOL...ok.

Listen to this, then email Dan Bongino (former federal crimes investigator and Secret Service special agent under Bush/Obama) and debunk why he's wrong (be careful, if you've not listened to his past half dozen podcasts, or you might get egg on your face- basically, it's complicated)....let us know how he responds:

January 19, 2018: Ep. 637 Release the Memo Now – Dan Bongino
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
The fix was in, everyone knows that...

While we are waiting for what should be a no-brainer release of the facts, please recognize that a federal court last year already found egregious and lawless deliberate abuse of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) by the FBI specifically, and certainly implicating DOJ.

The court’s decision reveals (see link below) that the upper echelon of the FBI (such as James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok and others) deliberately gave unlimited and unsupervised access to the most private raw FISA data to a private contractor. (Can you say Fusion GPS?)

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/51117/2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf


maxresdefault.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
The fix was in, everyone knows that...

While we are waiting for what should be a no-brainer release of the facts, please recognize that a federal court last year already found egregious and lawless deliberate abuse of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) by the FBI specifically, and certainly implicating DOJ.

The court’s decision reveals (see link below) that the upper echelon of the FBI (such as James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok and others) deliberately gave unlimited and unsupervised access to the most private raw FISA data to a private contractor. (Can you say Fusion GPS?)

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/51117/2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf


maxresdefault.jpg

With those big ears I'm surprised he can't fly solo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
This whole DOJ/FBI/Clinton/Obama administration, and 'Anti-Trump' thing is a T-total mess. It appears, as if there honestly may have been an small syndicate group, secret society if you will, within the justice dept, the WH; and the Clinton campaign in some fashion to crush Trump...it's a mess, I'd say there may need to be another independent Special Council appointed. Who knows what to think or believe. This thing keeps getting worse and worse, it's a mess.


the-scheme.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Are you kidding me???
You cannot make this up...

FBI ‘failed to preserve’ five months of text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. From Dec. 14, 2016 to May 17, 2017, to THE DAY that Mueller was picked as special counsel.

FBI Failed To Preserve Strzok Text Messages M | The Daily Caller … @dailycaller


@RepDeSantis

FBI Director Wray needs to provide an explanation for why the FBI deleted six months’ worth of Strozk-Page text messages sent during the Trump transition and early months of the Trump presidency. Was evidence about the anti-Trump “insurance policy” deleted?
 
Last edited:
He's alive!!!

Jeff Sessions says ‘we will leave no stone unturned’ to find missing FBI text messages.

In response to FBI "missing" texts scandal, AG Sessions should direct U.S. Marshals to take steps to seize, secure and preserve necessary computer evidence at FBI. And if AG doesn't act, @RealDonaldTrump should order it be done.
 

VN Store



Back
Top