TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

[Squints]

It's close to put up or shut up time. My money is on "put up." Your money is on "shut up." I would say "may the best man win", but that would be me at an unfair advantage.

Your e-wang is a mile long.....only in your mind.

 

[volfanhill]

Obstruction of Justice

No it’s not

 

[luthervol]

No it’s not

Is too.

 

[volfanhill]

Is too.

Lol. My response warranted yours. Well done.


With that said you can’t cry about it if he doesn’t do it. And by that I mean firing them. The only one you might, and I think it’s a stretch, is Comey.

 

[luthervol]

Lol. My response warranted yours. Well done.


With that said you can’t cry about it if he doesn’t do it. And by that I mean firing them. The only one you might, and I think it’s a stretch, is Comey.

And I'll concede the point. I think what most see is an ongoing ATTEMPT to impede the investigation. My hope is that they dig until they find something. (I think they already have) Trump has earned the scrutiny.

 

[golfballs]

Trump-Mueller Interview: President Should Refuse Request | National Review

 

[golfballs]

Witch hunt gone amok. Shut it down

 

[golfballs]

[twitter]https://twitter.com/bretbaier/status/940952690082885633[/twitter]

Supposedly now all of Andrew McCabes text messages have now been lost

 

[OuterBanksVol]

For those confused as to why Trumps actions constitute Obstruction of Justice. A.K.A. The Republican Guide to Spring Activities on the Hill.

Presidential obstruction of justice: The case of Donald J. Trump

 

[golfballs]

For those confused as to why Trumps actions constitute Obstruction of Justice. A.K.A. The Republican Guide to Spring Activities on the Hill.

Presidential obstruction of justice: The case of Donald J. Trump

Finally, one crucial caveat that is important to note: the publication of this paper comes at a time when our understanding of the facts is still developing and without the benefit of the investigative
...
Note: Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) is a party (and is providing representation to other parties) in active litigation involving President Trump and the administration.

Cool story

 

[BigOrangeTrain]

There is not one tenth as much "questionable" activity involved in the uranium 1 deal as there is in the Trump/Russia connection.

Spoken like a true brainwashed liberal.

 

[BigOrangeTrain]

For those confused as to why Trumps actions constitute Obstruction of Justice. A.K.A. The Republican Guide to Spring Activities on the Hill.

Presidential obstruction of justice: The case of Donald J. Trump

You got him now. What straw will you guys grasp for after this one falls flat? Lol.

 

[ajvol01]

His firing of Comey in an apparent attempt to avoid being investigated. The irony is priceless.

The order/sequence of events matters Luther.

So, according to you he was being spied on by the Obama White House / FBI during the campaign and after the election because...?

What was the reason why Trump team was under surveillance in 2016?

The Comey firing happened on May 9, 2017.

Why was the FBI investigating Donald Trump in 2016?

And before you say collusion, it is not a federal crime.

 

[ajvol01]

Stefanik Comey Hearing | User Clip | C-SPAN.org

Under direct questioning by Congresswoman Elise Stefanik in March 2017 - Comey admits that only the Obama White House was notified of Trump surveillance/intelligence gathering in 2016

The House intelligence committee wasn't notified. The DNI (Director of National Intelligence) wasn't notified.

He actually lies saying "there was no DNI" when James Clapper served in that role until 1/20/2017.

 

[OuterBanksVol]

Senate passed sanctions on Russia 98-2. Yet white house has not implemented them. Deadline is Monday.

98-2.

Donald's bromance with Putin continues... well... at least until impeachment.

Deadline looms for Trump and Russia sanctions - POLITICO

 

[Orangeslice13]

And reality

Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., indicated Friday that President Trump probably isn't guilty of obstruction of justice just because he reportedly wanted to fire special counsel Robert Mueller last June.

"He didn't actually fire Mueller, so no act was committed," Himes said on CNN when asked if that report meant he obstructed justice. "But what it does do is it shows intent and it's not surprising."



So.......
trump wants to fire a guy but doesn’t because it “might” be obstruction. What a horrible guy.


Muller better find something or make this which hunt last longer than the Trump presidency. Because if it doesn’t muller will be the one investigated and it will get ugly.

 

[AirVol]

And reality

Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., indicated Friday that President Trump probably isn't guilty of obstruction of justice just because he reportedly wanted to fire special counsel Robert Mueller last June.

"He didn't actually fire Mueller, so no act was committed," Himes said on CNN when asked if that report meant he obstructed justice. "But what it does do is it shows intent and it's not surprising."



So.......
trump wants to fire a guy but doesn’t because it “might” be obstruction. What a horrible guy.


Muller better find something or make this which hunt last longer than the Trump presidency. Because if it doesn’t muller will be the one investigated and it will get ugly.

“Intent” has a different meaning when it applies to Repubes.

 

[FLVOL_79]

For those confused as to why Trumps actions constitute Obstruction of Justice. A.K.A. The Republican Guide to Spring Activities on the Hill.

Presidential obstruction of justice: The case of Donald J. Trump

Wow. The levels of desperation from the left is impressive, and a bit scary.

Keep distorting reality to fit your narrative! It's going to work out real well...

 

[OuterBanksVol]

And reality

Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., indicated Friday that President Trump probably isn't guilty of obstruction of justice just because he reportedly wanted to fire special counsel Robert Mueller last June.

"He didn't actually fire Mueller, so no act was committed," Himes said on CNN when asked if that report meant he obstructed justice. "But what it does do is it shows intent and it's not surprising."



So.......
trump wants to fire a guy but doesn’t because it “might” be obstruction. What a horrible guy.


Muller better find something or make this which hunt last longer than the Trump presidency. Because if it doesn’t muller will be the one investigated and it will get ugly.

Wrong. LOL.

There is a clear pattern in Trump's behavior, and the key is whether Mueller determines a motive of "corrupt intent". Each layer peeled back confirms again and again Trumps intent to stymie the Investigation. It doesn't get more direct than attempting to fire the guy investigating you. opcorn:

"As we learned Thursday in the New York Times, there was indeed a need to protect Mueller back in June, when Trump ordered the firing of special counsel due to “conflicts of interest” that were not actually conflicts and appear to be thinly veiled excuses to get rid of Mueller. Trump also considered firing Rosenstein and replacing him with Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand, the No. 3 Justice Department official, so she could oversee Mueller. According to the Times, Trump has wavered for months about whether he wants to fire Mueller, which is an “omnipresent concern among his legal team and close aides.”

This is an important piece of evidence because it comes after Trump fired Comey and learned that he was under investigation for obstruction of justice. It should be easy for Mueller to prove that Trump read or viewed legal analysis discussing the possibility that Trump obstructed justice by firing Comey. Trump’s desire to fire Mueller despite knowing that firing a law enforcement official overseeing the Russia investigation could raise obstruction concerns is strong evidence that Trump’s intent was to obstruct the investigation. The excuses offered by Trump also bolster Mueller’s case, because they indicate that the president realized that firing Mueller to impede the investigation would be perceived as wrongful.

All of this, taken together, greatly strengthens the case that Trump had “corrupt” intent when he fired Comey.

 

[Orangeslice13]

And yet not one constitutional lawyer has said anything other than “Trump is not guilty of obstruction”.

By pattern of behavior you clearly mean pattern of legal behavior
Your “pattern of behavior” doesn’t mean ****. If it did HRC would have been jailed long ago.

 

[AirVol]

Fun watching Outerspace, Mickey and Loother trying to outdumb each other.

 

[FLVOL_79]

Fun watching Outerspace, Mickey and Loother trying to outdumb each other.

Must be an awesome prize for the winner because they sure are trying hard.

Probably an enviromentally friendly sourced man purse Indian Jones themed satchel..

 

[AirVol]

Must be an awesome prize for the winner because they sure are trying hard.

Probably an enviromentally friendly sourced man purse Indian Jones themed satchel..

Maybe cuck the others wife.

 

[OuterBanksVol]

]And yet not one constitutional lawyer has said anything other than “Trump is not guilty of obstruction”. [/B]

By pattern of behavior you clearly mean pattern of legal behavior
Your “pattern of behavior” doesn’t mean ****. If it did HRC would have been jailed long ago.

Keep on throwing up softballs... or maybe it's just pure ignorance? I'm guessing that like Trump you don't read. Either way, sorry you're wrong on all counts.

I asked 6 legal experts if Trump obstructed justice. Here’s what they told me. - Vox

 

[hog88]

And reality

Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., indicated Friday that President Trump probably isn't guilty of obstruction of justice just because he reportedly wanted to fire special counsel Robert Mueller last June.

"He didn't actually fire Mueller, so no act was committed," Himes said on CNN when asked if that report meant he obstructed justice. "But what it does do is it shows intent and it's not surprising."



So.......
trump wants to fire a guy but doesn’t because it “might” be obstruction. What a horrible guy.


Muller better find something or make this which hunt last longer than the Trump presidency. Because if it doesn’t muller will be the one investigated and it will get ugly.

Muller is at a tipping point, he can wrap this up and save his reputation or continue headlong as he is and leave in disgrace and possible disbarment. It looks like he is choosing the latter.