volfanhill
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
- Messages
- 35,078
- Likes
- 61,388
So, since that is the standard -- perfection or it's a waste -- if Trump fails to shut it down 100 percent, I assume you will want him thrown out of office, correct ?
Perfection? Please don't be obtuse.
The border was at least under control four years ago, and the floodgates opened as soon as this sad excuse of an administration took charge in 2020 and issued executive orders overturning everything Trump had done, and made sure any work on the wall ceased. But then you know all this already.
They dismantled every protection from the previous admin then watched the chaos for 3yrs before making this grand "plan to make progress." A plan so wonderful they had to wrap it up with over 80% being foreign war funding so that their party could even stomach itAh, I can see the goal posts moving as I type this.
When Biden was in charge, a plan to make progress was due to be rejected because it would not shut the border down 100 percent.
You apply that standard to a plan under his watch.
When I say you must also apply that same zero tolerance standard to Trump, the standard changes to some vague, unknown effect.
I am sure that whatever he does, effective or not, you will sing its praises.
I wonder how many times he's made that argument and had this thing pointed out? It's like 50 First Dates and Biden's border policy had a baby.They dismantled every protection from the previous admin then watched the chaos for 3yrs before making this grand "plan to make progress." A plan so wonderful they had to wrap it up with over 80% being foreign war funding so that their party could even stomach it
numbers are obviously arbitrary but:Ah, I can see the goal posts moving as I type this.
When Biden was in charge, a plan to make progress was due to be rejected because it would not shut the border down 100 percent.
You apply that standard to a plan under his watch.
When I say you must also apply that same zero tolerance standard to Trump, the standard changes to some vague, unknown effect.
I am sure that whatever he does, effective or not, you will sing its praises.
Ah, I can see the goal posts moving as I type this.
When Biden was in charge, a plan to make progress was due to be rejected because it would not shut the border down 100 percent.
You apply that standard to a plan under his watch.
When I say you must also apply that same zero tolerance standard to Trump, the standard changes to some vague, unknown effect.
I am sure that whatever he does, effective or not, you will sing its praises.
They dismantled every protection from the previous admin then watched the chaos for 3yrs before making this grand "plan to make progress." A plan so wonderful they had to wrap it up with over 80% being foreign war funding so that their party could even stomach it
You're being obtuse again, obviously for effect. Let me spell it out - all Biden, or whoever was pulling his strings, had to do was leave the border the f***k alone and finish the wall. Period. It wasn't perfect, but it also wasn't close to the nightmare it was purposely made into by whatever scum was making decisions for the last four years.
And no, it is you on the left who worship government and look to it to solve every problem in life. I was plenty critical of Trump the first time around and am hoping he doesn't repeat his mistakes. One of the huge ones he has already begun correcting is appointing competent, loyal people as opposed to the deep state garbage he trusted in 2016
hopefully they replace Lee Corso with her. shave her head, and make her say "not so fast my friends" and people won't know the difference.where does MTG fit in with the new administration? She’s always seemed like she was jockeying for a position in Trumps cabinet. Just haven’t heard much from her or about her since the elevation.
lets say you have an area that doesn't have good security. like a mall. you have some guards but they just sit in the security room, and there are lots of security issues that happen because of it. some people want a full security overhaul. others want even less security. so you "compromise" by getting more security guards, but require them to also only sit in the security room.Soooo... the goal posts move yet again.
First it was any plan that is not 100 % effective is crap.
When pointed out that Trump's own plans in 2025 and beyond may not be 100 % effective, you realize the error in your logic (letting the perfect be the enemy of the good), and you say that is not the standard, but just for Trump.
When I point out that you are moving the goal posts, you double down, and move them again. Now, its shifted to be that nothing proposed under Biden's watch on immigration was worthwhile because it did not simply continue Trump's 2018 plans.
See folks, this is what happens when you just knee jerk reject anything imperfect from a political opponent and refuse to acknowledge, or in the case of Trump earlier this year, even allow, compromise, just so you can get a gigantic attaboy from your know-nothing base.
And we wonder why things can't get done.
If Biden had not revoked every Trump border rule it would never have gotten to the point of needing that bill. The bill was only required because of the absolute failure of Biden immigration policies.And it would have passed, and things would have gotten better.
And Trump just couldn't live with that.
Agree. There's alot of consitantly wrong takes up in here. He has more reason to take down the uniparty then almost anyone in congress.Too many of you underestimate Gaetz. He was the main architect behind unseating his Party's sitting Speaker. All while facing a ferocious headwind from DC Uniparty types, investigations, threats against him and his family and constant mainstream press propaganda.
And it would have passed, and things would have gotten better.
And Trump just couldn't live with that.