TrumPutinGate

#3,276
#3,276
volprof said:
I'm sorry to say, but when this is all finally over, the Republican Party will be lucky to still be an existing entity.

"Treason abetters" doesn't look good as a party platform.
Click to expand...

To this point you've found a large amount of nothing. You sound as crazy as the birthers.

This is the liberals birthers moment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#3,277
#3,277
Vol8188 said:
To this point you've found a large amount of nothing. You sound as crazy as the birthers.

This is the liberals birthers moment.
Click to expand...

Indeed.

As everyone knows, the FBI investigation into Obama's birth certificate is still ongoing.
 
#3,278
#3,278
I swear, some of you just kill me.

I sometimes wonder that if it weren't for a few other posters and myself if the FBI investigation into Donny collusion would even be a thread here.

One of the biggest stories in the history of presidential politics, and you jokers probably wouldn't even have a thread for it.
 
#3,280
#3,280
So Burr won't sign a request for documents from the Donny team.

Hmmm.

Now, why would a sitting US senator not want to see documents from individuals being investigated for treason by the FBI?

I wonder. Can anyone help me out here.

I think at this point men like Burr would take Watergate-level and call it a day. The fact of the matter, however, is it's going to be far worse.
 
#3,282
#3,282
Thread assessment: accurate.

https://twitter.com/4everNeverTrump/status/856535343025213440

In the end, just like Watergate, it may not even be the actual crimes themselves that take down the illegal regime. It may merely end up being the coverup, which is clearly going on right before our very eyes. If you can't see that, then you have worse vision than that 117 year old Italian lady. And she's dead now too.
 
#3,283
#3,283
Wow! I didn't realize that Watergate was evidently 27 months in process until the resignation. I knew it was over a year, but didn't know it was that long.
 
#3,284
#3,284
volprof said:
Thread assessment: accurate.

https://twitter.com/4everNeverTrump/status/856535343025213440

In the end, just like Watergate, it may not even be the actual crimes themselves that take down the illegal regime. It may merely end up being the coverup, which is clearly going on right before our very eyes. If you can't see that, then you have worse vision than that 117 year old Italian lady. And she's dead now too.
Click to expand...

You, on the other hand have great vision to the point that you see things that just aren't there.

Schizophrenia can do that.
 
#3,285
#3,285
37L1 said:
You, on the other hand have great vision to the point that you see things that just aren't there.

Schizophrenia can do that.
Click to expand...

So, let's just go ahead and wrap up Comey's investigation then, right?

Be truthful. The time for subterfuge is over. What were your thoughts on the FBI investigation into Hillary's emails? Did you support it? Were you displeased by its results? Etc.
 
#3,286
#3,286
volprof said:
So, let's just go ahead and wrap up Comey's investigation then, right?

Be truthful. The time for subterfuge is over. What were your thoughts on the FBI investigation into Hillary's emails? Did you support it? Were you displeased by its results? Etc.
Click to expand...

By all means investigate it. Whatever they come up with, it is what it is. Presupposing high treason was wrong on Hillary's mess and with this one too.

You have gone so far off of the deep end that there is no hope for any objectivity coming from where you are. You just continue to post more crazy. It's a joke. Who can take you seriously?
 
#3,287
#3,287
37L1 said:
By all means investigate it. Whatever they come up with, it is what it is. Presupposing high treason was wrong on Hillary's mess and with this one too.

You have gone so far off of the deep end that there is no hope for any objectivity coming from where you are. You just continue to post more crazy. It's a joke. Who can take you seriously?
Click to expand...

Who presupposed treason with Hillary, other than whack jobs like Frank Pierce and joevol? She didn't commit treason. She isn't a complete scumbag like Donny. But she did jeopardize our national security out of gross negligence and should have been punished as such.

Something tells me you're not being fully candid with us.

See, I supported the Hillary investigation, and I thought Comey's determination was wrong, given what I knew about her handling of state security.

My hope is that he gets this one right, and, from what I'm hearing, he will.
 
#3,288
#3,288
37L1 said:
By all means investigate it. Whatever they come up with, it is what it is. Presupposing high treason was wrong on Hillary's mess and with this one too.

You have gone so far off of the deep end that there is no hope for any objectivity coming from where you are. You just continue to post more crazy. It's a joke. Who can take you seriously?
Click to expand...

.
 

Attachments

  • index.jpg
    index.jpg
    9.5 KB · Views: 60
#3,289
#3,289
volprof said:
Who presupposed treason with Hillary, other than whack jobs like Frank Pierce and joevol? She didn't commit treason. She isn't a complete scumbag like Donny. But she did jeopardize our national security out of gross negligence and should have been punished as such.

Something tells me you're not being fully candid with us.

See, I supported the Hillary investigation, and I thought Comey's determination was wrong, given what I knew about her handling of state security.

My hope is that he gets this one right, and, from what I'm hearing, he will.
Click to expand...
A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.

You come off as a whack job on this matter. Absolutely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#3,290
#3,290
volprof said:
Who presupposed treason with Hillary, other than whack jobs like Frank Pierce and joevol? She didn't commit treason. She isn't a complete scumbag like Donny. But she did jeopardize our national security out of gross negligence and should have been punished as such.

Something tells me you're not being fully candid with us.

See, I supported the Hillary investigation, and I thought Comey's determination was wrong, given what I knew about her handling of state security.

My hope is that he gets this one right, and, from what I'm hearing, he will.
Click to expand...

You calling someone a wack job is rich

And just so everyone knows, when you say "from what I'm hearing" that really means from what you read on far left lunatic (just like you) websites
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#3,291
#3,291
volfanjustin said:
You calling someone a wack job is rich

And just so everyone knows, when you say "from what I'm hearing" that really means from what you read on far left lunatic (just like you) websites
Click to expand...

No. When I say "I'm hearing" and "people are saying," I'm mocking that treason bastard you voted into office.

You didn't give a damn about his doing the same, so why should you be concerned about me?

And for the record, my sources are half conservative and half liberal. See, it is possible for both on the spectrum to be opposed to treason.
 
#3,292
#3,292
37L1 said:
A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.

You come off as a whack job on this matter. Absolutely.
Click to expand...

Those rumoring of Watergate probably came across the same, but it happened.

I hear everything. So far, the only thing I have heard that gives me pause to think that Donny may not have in fact committed treason is the DNC server/FBI matter.

I can, however, think of legitimate reasons, none legal of course, why they might not want that server in FBI hands.

That's pretty much it.
 
#3,293
#3,293
volprof said:
No. When I say "I'm hearing" and "people are saying," I'm mocking that treason bastard you voted into office.

You didn't give a damn about his doing the same, so why should you be concerned about me?

And for the record, my sources are half conservative and half liberal. See, it is possible for both on the spectrum to be opposed to treason.
Click to expand...

You have reached your conclusion of guilt by what you have read on the internet and search daily for more to bolster your conclusion, which you posited before your "research". Everything you read is to support the presupposition based upon your dislike for the person.

How are you any different than those posters you disparage for doing the same?
 
#3,294
#3,294
37L1 said:
You have reached your conclusion of guilt by what you have read on the internet and search daily for more to bolster your conclusion, which you posited before your "research". Everything you read is to support the presupposition based upon your dislike for the person.

How are you any different than those posters you disparage for doing the same?
Click to expand...

The difference is that I actually have good sources, who have been right time and again.

That's the difference, and yes, Donny is a traitor.

Take your little faux-rational act elsewhere.
 
#3,295
#3,295
So, here's where we stand.

The SSIC is the following:

1. No full-time investigator
2. Only part-time staffers
3. No Donny people even interviewed yet
4. No documents requested or subpoenaed yet

And this was the congressional "investigation" that was supposed to "get it right."

Good to know our government is looking out for us, especially on such a sensitive issue as this.

Comey, please god, do the right thing.
 
#3,296
#3,296
volprof said:
The difference is that I actually have good sources, who have been right time and again.

That's the difference, and yes, Donny is a traitor.

Take your little faux-rational act elsewhere.
Click to expand...

It is called "objectivity", something you haven't been familiar with for a long time now.

images
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3,297
#3,297
37L1 said:
It is called "objectivity", something you haven't been familiar with for a long time now.

images
Click to expand...

I imagine individuals like yourself were trying to convince Woodward and Bernstein of the same at the time.

And no, I am not comparing myself to them. I'm just a guy that listens to people who have done the groundwork.
 
#3,298
#3,298
volprof said:
I imagine individuals like yourself were trying to convince Woodward and Bernstein of the same at the time.

And no, I am not comparing myself to them. I'm just a guy that listens to people who have done the groundwork.
Click to expand...

You listen only to those who say what you want to hear.

#
impostor-syndrome-cartoon-823x1024.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,299
#3,299
In my best Jeff Foxworthy:

If you think that a guy with the ethics of a child molester couldn't possibly collude with the Russians to rig our election, you might be an *******.

If you think that an orange spray-tanned money launderer, who's settled in court to avoid prosecution, wouldn't dare to think of selling this country down the river, you might be an *******.

If you even once thought about mocking the FBI investigation into collusion between the Donny campaign and the Kremlin by changing your VolNation avatar to Stalin, you might just be an *******.

If you think it more likely that Obama and Hillary and Susan Rice colluded with a dozen foreign intelligence agencies to violate all sorts of laws just to smear Donny's none-existent good name and that they waited to reveal any of this until after he was elected...if you think this more likely than the simple matter that Donny received the personal data of hacked voter registries from the Kremlin in order to target individual voters with "fake news" on Facebook and Twitter and to determine which states to target specifically and how, you might just be an *******.
 
Last edited:
#3,300
#3,300
volprof said:
So, let's just go ahead and wrap up Comey's investigation then, right?

Be truthful. The time for subterfuge is over. What were your thoughts on the FBI investigation into Hillary's emails? Did you support it? Were you displeased by its results? Etc.
Click to expand...

Absolutely, investigate it and assuming charges are warranted charge those deserving regardless what level or position they are in. I just ask that all of it be investigated on both sides of the isle.

The difference between us is if Trump himself or his close associates are proven to have colluded with the Russians, I'll call for his head. If no collusion is found I will hope he succeeds as President. You on the other-hand will join right in with the "it's a conspiracy" and start claiming the investigators were Russian pawns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top