TrumPutinGate

I think I've figured out the solution to preventing several members of this forum to continue to portray all of this as some sort of mere joke.

In your mind, replace Donny with Hillary and Melania with Bill. Replace Sessions with Holder and Lynch, three fine perjurers and defenders of scandal them all, and Bannon with Ben Rhodes. Then, picture Susan Rice as Mike Flynn and, finally, Podesta as Manafort.

Now that you've done so, you finally grasp the gravity of this massive scandal that simply isn't going to go away no matter how hard some may wish it.

Thanks for doing your patriotic duty, even if it was simply using your imagination for once.

Soon
 
I think I've figured out the solution to preventing several members of this forum to continue to portray all of this as some sort of mere joke.

In your mind, replace Donny with Hillary and Melania with Bill. Replace Sessions with Holder and Lynch, three fine perjurers and defenders of scandal them all, and Bannon with Ben Rhodes. Then, picture Susan Rice as Mike Flynn and, finally, Podesta as Manafort.

Now that you've done so, you finally grasp the gravity of this massive scandal that simply isn't going to go away no matter how hard some may wish it.

Thanks for doing your patriotic duty, even if it was simply using your imagination for once.

So would Hillary and Melania be getting it on?
 
You guys are going to feel awful stupid one day, but, for now, we've got to get this traitor out.

As with his attacks on the media, the IC, and the judiciary, all ploys of his in anticipation of the day he's finally held to account, the National Enquirer is already positioning Donny's defense strategy. He's setting it up for plausible deniability and, get this, his own incompetence.

https://twitter.com/TrueFactsStated/status/856708752824840194

Never thought I'd experience the day when I cite National Enquirer front pages to prove a point, but, as per The Washington Post, that is Donny's paper of choice. He has direct access to the publisher and uses it to sneak out "scoops" (fake ones of course) to the public.

If you can't see what's coming down the pike, then god help you.

EDIT: You have to scroll down the comments page to see the Enquirer cover. The only thing factual about it is the mention of the 10 dead Russian spies.
 
Last edited:
So VP, how does it work? Do you get a commission on troll posts or is a base on a quota? Also, do you have to do the research to find these obscure articles and twatters or do they feed them to you?
 
You guys are going to feel awful stupid one day, but, for now, we've got to get this traitor out.

As with his attacks on the media, the IC, and the judiciary, all ploys of his in anticipation of the day he's finally held to account, the National Enquirer is already positioning Donny's defense strategy. He's setting it up for plausible deniability and, get this, his own incompetence.

https://twitter.com/TrueFactsStated/status/856708752824840194

Never thought I'd experience the day when I cite National Enquirer front pages to prove a point, but, as per The Washington Post, that is Donny's paper of choice. He has direct access to the publisher and uses it to sneak out "scoops" (fake ones of course) to the public.

If you can't see what's coming down the pike, then god help you.

EDIT: You have to scroll down the comments page to see the Enquirer cover. The only thing factual about it is the mention of the 10 dead Russian spies.

.
 

Attachments

  • 61239332.jpg
    61239332.jpg
    25.6 KB · Views: 56
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
You guys are going to feel awful stupid one day, but, for now, we've got to get this traitor out.

As with his attacks on the media, the IC, and the judiciary, all ploys of his in anticipation of the day he's finally held to account, the National Enquirer is already positioning Donny's defense strategy. He's setting it up for plausible deniability and, get this, his own incompetence.

https://twitter.com/TrueFactsStated/status/856708752824840194

Never thought I'd experience the day when I cite National Enquirer front pages to prove a point, but, as per The Washington Post, that is Donny's paper of choice. He has direct access to the publisher and uses it to sneak out "scoops" (fake ones of course) to the public.

If you can't see what's coming down the pike, then god help you.

EDIT: You have to scroll down the comments page to see the Enquirer cover. The only thing factual about it is the mention of the 10 dead Russian spies.
One can feel awful, or one can feel stupid. One can feel awfully stupid. One can also be awfully stupid.
 
One can feel awful, or one can feel stupid. One can feel awfully stupid. One can also be awfully stupid.

It's a colloquialism.

I can always trust '72, the non-elitist, to look for spelling and grammar issues in others' posts.

Anyhow, back to your treason sanctioning with you.
 
Oh, according to Jim Acosta, the WH "doesn't have the Flynn documents." They're evidently just somewhere floating around in the ether.

I'll tell you what, Donny, let's get a federal judge and a team of G-Men on that matter promptly.

Now, Donny, are those documents still "missing"?
 
VP, are these the people you are referring to when you say "my sources" or "I'm hearing"?

I can neither confirm nor deny sources in an ongoing counterintelligence operation.

But, people are saying that it does not look good for Team Trumpov.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Guess who else didn't disclose ties to Russia and foreign governments in his official applications for clearance?

Precious little Jared.

How is it possible for a WH to be this mired in scandal in less than 100 days?

I'll tell you how. Donny is there. That's how.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Bingo. Yes, these far left loony twitter accounts are his sources

Yep, that's it.

Including the FBI investigation. That was made up by the far left loonies I follow.

It actually isn't happening, and the video of Comey announcing that it was happening was made up by Hillary and the Democrats to sabotage Donny's young presidency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Never thought I'd be interested in Bitcoin, but seems that that is something we're eventually going to hear about here as well.

Bitcoin. Don't we have a thread on Bitcoin? Probably one Ras or somebody started to discuss Western globalist corruption or something like that?

I may have to meander my way over there one of these days.
 
I've got a week off from work, so I figured I'd sit here and harass you all the majority of the day.

I think I'm going to start a daily reminder here that Watergate was 27 months.

So, here goes:

Watergate was 27months before Nixon's resignation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
"No, I do not," Rogers said in a House Select Intelligence Committee hearing when asked if he had any evidence that Russian cyber actors changed vote tallies in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Florida, North Carolina and Ohio.

FBI Director James Comey also said that his agency had no such evidence.
.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Yep, that's it.

Including the FBI investigation. That was made up by the far left loonies I follow.

It actually isn't happening, and the video of Comey announcing that it was happening was made up by Hillary and the Democrats to sabotage Donny's young presidency.

And FBI investigation that has turned up exactly nothing. Since when is an investigation proof of wrong-doing? The past eight years has proven that gov't agencies can and are turned against political opponents. So again... Since when is the aiming of a political machine an incrimination against its target?
 

I would concur. I've never seen any evidence or suggestion that they actually hacked the vote count.

I've never claimed that at all.

When I say Donny is a fake president and that we had an illegitimate election, it's because he colluded with the Russians to release damaging information on one campaign and, I also believe, used hacked Russian voter registry information for certain American states to determine which particular voters to target and which particular states needed the most addressing and by what kind of specific messaging.

The latter I am still not completely positive about, but the former (Trump generally colluded with Kremlin to release damaging information on Hillary), I am 95 percent positive on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
And FBI investigation that has turned up exactly nothing. Since when is an investigation proof of wrong-doing? The past eight years has proven that gov't agencies can and are turned against political opponents. So again... Since when is the aiming of a political machine an incrimination against its target?

What do you mean the FBI investigation hasn't turned up any evidence?

How do you know this?

Do you expect the FBI to intermittently release information and evidence to you so as to keep you invested in its investigation?

For the record, since this has all become public (even before Comey's announcement), it is reported that many of the targets or likely targets immediately changed their communication practices, making the investigation more difficult.
 
I would concur. I've never seen any evidence or suggestion that they actually hacked the vote count.

I've never claimed that at all.

When I say Donny is a fake president and that we had an illegitimate election, it's because he colluded with the Russians to release damaging information on one campaign and, I also believe, used hacked Russian voter registry information for certain American states to determine which particular voters to target and which particular states needed the most addressing and by what kind of specific messaging.

The latter I am still not completely positive about, but the former (Trump generally colluded with Kremlin to release damaging information on Hillary), I am 95 percent positive on.

You all stay hung up on those emails that were allegedly hacked (again the FBI hasnt seen the servers) but there wasn't anything in those emails that furthered her being shown as a terrible candidate.
 
Orange, I'm curious. You're one of the very few rational posters here that seems to believe it unlikely Donny colluded. I understand your skepticism, and I also get the sense that you are relatively open-minded here, rather than just merely writing this all off as fodder for jokes - like some.

At what point would you change your mind though? What would it take?

Would it take an individual, like Flynn, being indicted?

Would it take the leaking of a tape (which I am under the impression multiple exists) of collusion between Team Donny and the Russians?

Would it take Comey actually recommending charges to the DOJ?

Or would none of that still suffice? Would it take actual conviction in a court of law of Donny himself?

I'm just curious where exactly your "Oh, it was treason"-o-meter lies.
 
What do you mean the FBI investigation hasn't turned up any evidence?

How do you know this?

Do you expect the FBI to intermittently release information and evidence to you so as to keep you invested in its investigation?

For the record, since this has all become public (even before Comey's announcement), it is reported that many of the targets or likely targets immediately changed their communication practices, making the investigation more difficult.

Well, in my defense, we don't all have access to the top secret findings of these investigations--also known as Twitter.
 

VN Store



Back
Top