TrumPutinGate

The difference is Claude Taylor is a former WH staffer who correctly predicted the involvement of the grand juries and to an extent the subpoenas before it was reported on.

I agree a single Twitter source should be taken carefully, but he's proven to have some level of inside knowledge here.

Anyone who uses their their name to assure their audience they are telling the truth is not to be trusted.

TrueFactsStated may as well be Pravda.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
You insult everyone who doesn't agree with you. Even those who don't resort to name calling with you.

You've gone from someone who always had an interesting - often eccentric - point of view to a hate filled jackass with 0 class.

Of course, you always rationalize by convincing yourself the other person is a Russian agent.

Yep, that's right.

And don't you forget it, Kremlinist.
 
The difference is Claude Taylor is a former WH staffer who correctly predicted the involvement of the grand juries and to an extent the subpoenas before it was reported on.

I agree a single Twitter source should be taken carefully, but he's proven to have some level of inside knowledge here.

If Claude Taylor was my only legitimate source, I wouldn't come in here and say the things I do.

He's just one of several.

I can't help it if the Kremlin lovers in here are too lazy to go and do the research themselves.
 
C_e_t4_XgBAowM6.jpg


:eek:lol:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I won't forget it. You owe a lot of people here an apology for your behavior.

Remember this: there will be no TrumPutin connection found.

I only apologize to people I respect.

You have thoroughly shown your ass here. You've shown what you're made of.

Basically just a Russian patriot, who prances around like he's some sort of open-minded thinker.

After this is over, your credibility will be completely shot. You'll go down with the flaming dungpile known as Donny as well.
 
I only apologize to people I respect.

You have thoroughly shown your ass here. You've shown what you're made of.

Basically just a Russian patriot, who prances around like he's some sort of open-minded thinker.

After this is over, your credibility will be completely shot. You'll go down with the flaming dungpile known as Donny as well.

Snore....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Remember, as I've been stating for two weeks now, grand juries are in place.

As CNN reported yesterday, subpoenas are being filed.

Indictments are just right around the corner.

Either Donny is ultimately going down, or this is now a banana republic.
 
This is a perfect illustration of liberal logic based on perceived intent.

Hillary broke the law. You, however, have deemed her intentions good and proclaimed her ignorant of the wall. Hillary good!

Trump has not been proven to have broken the law. Yet you have deemed him to be evil and his intentions bad. Trump bad!

If Clinton broke the law why isn't she behind bars. Ttrumpgate is an ongoing investigation . This is no time for partisan politics when western democracies are under attack from a russian strongman who has seen his country's power diminish so he turns to physiological warfare.
 
I won't forget it. You owe a lot of people here an apology for your behavior.

Remember this: there will be no TrumPutin connection found.

Only an independent investigation will provide the answer; without one, the majority will believe the truth was covered up.
 
If Clinton broke the law why isn't she behind bars. Ttrumpgate is an ongoing investigation . This is no time for partisan politics when western democracies are under attack from a russian strongman who has seen his country's power diminish so he turns to physiological warfare.

Not sure that is the standard you want to use regardless of who is in question.

Having said that, I have a feeling that if Trump broke the law and didn't end up in jail, you wouldn't be singing the same tune.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Only an independent investigation will provide the answer; without one, the majority will believe the truth was covered up.

Don't you think the results would lead to that if they aren't the ones you hoped for, no matter who conducts the investigation?
 
Of course it would. You saying no doesn't make it so.

C'mon. Seriously? The hard core left will never accept the finding of an independent panel if there is nothing proven concerning Trump and Russia.

Never. Period. End. Of. Story.

There will always be doubt cast and conspiracies hatched over the situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
C'mon. Seriously? The hard core left will never accept the finding of an independent panel if there is nothing proven concerning Trump and Russia.

Never. Period. End. Of. Story.

There will always be doubt cast and conspiracies hatched over the situation.

..You are on to somthing. With DEM members like Sheila Jackson Lee, Maxine Watters who believe the earth is made of cheese and that OJ is innocent.. Yes facts don't matter
 
..You are on to somthing. With DEM members like Sheila Jackson Lee, Maxine Watters who believe the earth is made of cheese and that OJ is innocent.. Yes facts don't matter

Jackson Lee doesn't think the earth is made of cheese.

But she still wants to see where John Glenn first stepped foot on Mars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
They are not even in the same universe. You're not comparing apples and oranges, you're comparing bologna and nuclear fission.

Not true Luther.
If Obammer was not an American citizen, yet POTUS vs an alleged Russian involvement in the election is more like oranges and tangerines. An unqualified non citizen elected is the bigger issue.
 
C'mon. Seriously? The hard core left will never accept the finding of an independent panel if there is nothing proven concerning Trump and Russia.

Never. Period. End. Of. Story.

There will always be doubt cast and conspiracies hatched over the situation.

Your last sentence is true. We are deciding between 60%, 40%, 20%, or 5% believing that there was a cover up. (big difference)
 

VN Store



Back
Top