Carl Pickens
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2006
- Messages
- 45,775
- Likes
- 63,166
Where's the proof Clinton broke the law as SOS.
This controversy isn't about people whining about losing an election. It's about a foreign ADVERSARY's attempt to undermine our democratic principles and lose faith in our most important institutions. That's not difficult to understand if you view it from a neutral POV.
Seriously?
You must confuse me with a Trump supporter. I have advocated, over multiple days, that both sides should withhold judgment until the facts come out. Unlike, VP, I don't want to hang Trump, yet. Unlike the Trump sycophants, I don't dismiss the accusations until the supposed evidence comes to light.
Furthermore, I seem to be about the only VN poster who doesn't believe he should have been fired by either administration. I think he probably did the best he could working within both totally dysfunctional/corrupt administrations which put him in awkward situations.
The FBI director serves at the president's pleasure, Comey was fired b/c he was serving at the trump's displeasure. Simple as that.
Breaking news! trump has issued an EO calling for an investigation of voter of voter fraud in an he won(the EC). The egotist is still very butthurt over losing the PV. There is very little room for fraud under the current voting restrictions. Typical trumpian attack on an American institution. :crazy:
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/11/politics/oval-office-photos-donald-trump-russians/index.html
Trump and staff are furious over the release of photos from meetings with Russian Ambassador yesterday by the Russian state media. Evidently the agreement was for the pictures to remain private. One WH official said the Russians lied to them and are not to be trusted.....live and learn I guess.
(I read the article quickly - someone can double check if they wish)
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/11/politics/oval-office-photos-donald-trump-russians/index.html
Trump and staff are furious over the release of photos from meetings with Russian Ambassador yesterday by the Russian state media. Evidently the agreement was for the pictures to remain private. One WH official said the Russians lied to them and are not to be trusted.....live and learn I guess.
(I read the article quickly - someone can double check if they wish)
One glaring lie in your post is "Trump was furious." Well, the article doesn't mention a reaction from Trump. Perhaps you should do a bit more in depth reading before posting such falsehoods.
I do love it with they use "unnamed sources." Almost sounds like a troll job to me. "Didn't know they would use the photographs"? Really?
One glaring lie in your post is "Trump was furious." Well, the article doesn't mention a reaction from Trump. Perhaps you should do a bit more in depth reading before posting such falsehoods.
I do love it with they use "unnamed sources." Almost sounds like a troll job to me. "Didn't know they would use the photographs"? Really?
I think when the statement reads "White House furious" it's safe to assume Trump is included....so that would not be a glaring lie (maybe you can call it an educated assumption based on past observations). He does have a history of getting bent out of shape over the most trivial of things. I'd bet you $100 to $1 that Trump was the one most furious.
One glaring lie in your post is "Trump was furious." Well, the article doesn't mention a reaction from Trump. Perhaps you should do a bit more in depth reading before posting such falsehoods.
I do love it with they use "unnamed sources." Almost sounds like a troll job to me. "Didn't know they would use the photographs"? Really?
Anonymous sources are a problem but we if only use press release statements for news it's not going to be very interesting and kind of North Korean.