TrumPutinGate

#6,526
#6,526
MakeTNGrtAgain said:
So now you're comparing the physical evidence of an SF-86 with evidence that he lied, with your lack of evidence with Brennan? Dude, you have got to be the most unreasonable, head-in-the-sand person I have encountered in my entire life.
Click to expand...

Its widely acknowledged that Brennan lied to Congress. I'm not the one with my head in the sand.
 
#6,527
#6,527
MakeTNGrtAgain said:
So now you're comparing the physical evidence of an SF-86 with evidence that he lied, with your lack of evidence with Brennan? Dude, you have got to be the most unreasonable, head-in-the-sand person I have encountered in my entire life.
Click to expand...

Just out of curiosity, have you seen his SF-86?
 
#6,534
#6,534
MakeTNGrtAgain said:
It's probably widely available online at this point as it was leaked to WaPo today.
Click to expand...

Based on past experiences, I'm pretty certain that is a felony offense. When are we going to see both sides of the aisle in the nut-house called Congress stand up and demand justice? Surely in your capacity, you could leak some damaging info on members who refuse to stand up and be counted. It's about time that the leaks started damaging the do nothing's in both houses, on both sides.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#6,535
#6,535
hog88 said:
Elaborate please.
Click to expand...

Kind of a fool me once. Sessions didn't include his meetings with Russian officials on his SF-86 which is a form you fill out to get security clearances. After not adding it to the form, he neglects to inform the Congress during his AG confirmation hearing that he had participated in these meetings. Then it gets out that it happened and it just "slipped his mind," which is why he recused himself from the investigation. Now that it's out that he didn't disclose these meetings on a critically important piece of the vetting process for clearance, it's going to look horrible on the admin if they don't address it.

Put simply, Bruce Pearl did something that wasn't a big deal, but he lied to the NCAA about it and got a show-cause. Similar (much more important) situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#6,536
#6,536
newokie03 said:
Based on past experiences, I'm pretty certain that is a felony offense. When are we going to see both sides of the aisle in the nut-house called Congress stand up and demand justice? Surely in your capacity, you could leak some damaging info on members who refuse to stand up and be counted. It's about time that the leaks started damaging the do nothing's in both houses, on both sides.
Click to expand...

The reason I am able to work in the free capacity that I do, is because while I have been approached about "leaks" in the past I have always not only rejected the opportunity to do it, but in more than one occasion forwarded the emails, voicemails, etc to my bosses. I would never leak information on anyone, unless it was a legitimate "whistleblower" situation which this certainly does not fall under.

It usb a felony offense and the person responsible should be found and charged.
 
#6,538
#6,538
MakeTNGrtAgain said:
Kind of a fool me once. Sessions didn't include his meetings with Russian officials on his SF-86 which is a form you fill out to get security clearances. After not adding it to the form, he neglects to inform the Congress during his AG confirmation hearing that he had participated in these meetings. Then it gets out that it happened and it just "slipped his mind," which is why he recused himself from the investigation. Now that it's out that he didn't disclose these meetings on a critically important piece of the vetting process for clearance, it's going to look horrible on the admin if they don't address it.

Put simply, Bruce Pearl did something that wasn't a big deal, but he lied to the NCAA about it and got a show-cause. Similar (much more important) situation.
Click to expand...

I'm familiar with the process and forms. These meetings were in group settings and not private formal meetings.
 
#6,539
#6,539
hog88 said:
I'm familiar with the process and forms. These meetings were in group settings and not private formal meetings.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter. Like I said, any situation in which this is disclosed on the form it's a shoulder shrug and "were gonna pay attention to this but no harm done" situation.
 
#6,542
#6,542
MakeTNGrtAgain said:
It doesn't matter. Like I said, any situation in which this is disclosed on the form it's a shoulder shrug and "were gonna pay attention to this but no harm done" situation.
Click to expand...

And it it wasn't for the new "red scare" the same would apply. I highly doubt every cabinet, senate or house member has disclosed every informal contract with a foreign government employee.
 
#6,547
#6,547
[youtube]https://youtu.be/2KnQ4CWOjGI?t=7m[/youtube]

Starting this vid at the 7 minute mark...
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top