TrumPutinGate

Had a blast. My nephew got married on the beach last night. We ate at Indian Pass, Sunset Cove, Cone Heads, Peppers, and Sand Bucket (all good). I give the golf course an average rating. The water was crystal clear.
I agree. The golf course is nothing special, but at least it has a driving range. I would rather practice than play.
 
Yesterday morning, the line was that the meeting was to discuss Russian adoption.

Last night, it was admitted that it was to get info that would hurt Clinton.

What changed?

(Hint: it was the NYT article)

So you're not bothered that the Russians potentially had damning information on Hillary just that the Trump campaign was willing to accept it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
So you're not bothered that the Russians potentially had damning information on Hillary just that the Trump campaign was willing to accept it?


The former I don't know enough about. The latter is major news, if for no other reason than that the administration has changed it's story about three times in 36 hours, suggesting strongly that yet again there is no one driving this bus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I understand the reasoning. The problem is we cannot have the political party that benefited from collusion stay in power. The only fair thing to do is have a new election.

Oh!?? But when the DNCC leadership "colluded" against Sanders to get the Hildabeast elected, that gets a free ride eh?

Once again, I do not believe you are a real lawyer. You have publicly stated in this post the Constitution should not be supported and some "fair" election (fair in whose eyes?) should be done. By doing that you have publicly said you DO NOT support the constitution.

If you really were a lawyer, then because you swore in your:

Oath of Admission to the Florida Bar:

“I do solemnly swear:

“I will support the Constitution of the United States....


you lied. You have established your character here in the PF for all to see.

But, then again...you are a Democrat. We should expect nothing else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
Oh!?? But when the DNCC leadership "colluded" against Sanders to get the Hildabeast elected, that gets a free ride eh?

Once again, I do not believe you are a real lawyer. You have publicly stated in this post the Constitution should not be supported and some "fair" election (fair in whose eyes?) should be done. By doing that you have publicly said you DO NOT support the constitution.

If you really were a lawyer, then because you swore in your:

Oath of Admission to the Florida Bar:

“I do solemnly swear:

“I will support the Constitution of the United States....


you lied. You have established your character here in the PF for all to see.

But, then again...you are a Democrat. We should expect nothing else.

Down goes Frazier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
The former I don't know enough about. The latter is major news, if for no other reason than that the administration has changed it's story about three times in 36 hours, suggesting strongly that yet again there is no one driving this bus.

Hillary was as dirty as they come and you know it. You just choose to ignore it.

Russia allegedly hacks, not our election, but the DNC servers. You and other democrats contribute to Hillary losing the election to this leaking of DNC emails. Emails that contained information, by your own admission such damning information that it cost her the election. Now, it surfaces that the Russians had more damning information on Hillary that could have further hurt her in the campaign. Instead of focusing on the real problem, all that crooked information that was contained in the DNC emails and whatever was out there that the Russians supposedly had, you focus on the ones that simply possessed the damning information.

Another thing that strikes me as odd is that all the way up to and including the night of the election, no one gave Trump a chance to win. So, why on God's green earth didn't the Trump campaign release this information that the Russians supposedly possessed that would hurt Hillary? I mean at the point up to election day, he had no chance of winning, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Hillary was as dirty as they come and you know it. You just choose to ignore it.

Russia allegedly hacks, not our election, but the DNC servers. You and other democrats contribute to Hillary losing the election to this leaking of DNC emails. Emails that contained information, by your own admission such damning information that it cost her the election. Now, it surfaces that the Russians had more damning information on Hillary that could have further hurt her in the campaign. Instead of focusing on the real problem, all that crooked information that was contained in the DNC emails and whatever was out there that the Russians supposedly had, you focus on the ones that simply possessed the damning information.

Another thing that strikes me as odd is that all the way up to and including the night of the election, no one gave Trump a chance to win. So, why on God's green earth didn't the Trump campaign release this information that the Russians supposedly possessed that would hurt Hillary? I mean at the point up to election day, he had no chance of winning, right?

Easily answered: Comey did the job for them. BTW, the russian cloud is becoming darker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
The former I don't know enough about. The latter is major news, if for no other reason than that the administration has changed it's story about three times in 36 hours, suggesting strongly that yet again there is no one driving this bus.

We have the most "forgetful" people running the country. :crazy:
 
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/1896569

From the article...

And then there are the racial dog whistles in Romney’s speech. No matter how much Republicans deny playing the race card by talking about welfare and “dependence,” much of the point of talking about it is to trigger pictures in Republican heads. Let’s be honest. For most Republicans, the mental image isn’t of a lazy white kid in front of an Xbox. The “freeloaders” are always people of color, usually black. (Doubt it? Then why did Romney play the “victims” trope immediately after the “dependent upon government” trope?) It used to work on me.

Your head isn't in sand .... you've let the concrete set...
 
Oh!?? But when the DNCC leadership "colluded" against Sanders to get the Hildabeast elected, that gets a free ride eh?

Once again, I do not believe you are a real lawyer. You have publicly stated in this post the Constitution should not be supported and some "fair" election (fair in whose eyes?) should be done. By doing that you have publicly said you DO NOT support the constitution.

If you really were a lawyer, then because you swore in your:

Oath of Admission to the Florida Bar:

“I do solemnly swear:

“I will support the Constitution of the United States....


you lied. You have established your character here in the PF for all to see.

But, then again...you are a Democrat. We should expect nothing else.


200.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
The Sanders concern trolling is so touching.

Give me a break. Had he won you people who are posting how unfairly he was treated (how?) would be ripping him to a million pieces as the most anti-American nominee ever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
The Sanders concern trolling is so touching.

Give me a break. Had he won you people who are posting how unfairly he was treated (how?) would be ripping him to a million pieces as the most anti-American nominee ever.

You would expect nothing less from a bunch of flaming hypocrites. :crazy:
 
Your head isn't in sand .... you've let the concrete set...

What the **** are you talking about? This was posted in reply to someone saying they didn't remember Romney being called racist after the 47% video leaked. Try reading with some ****ing context next time. HuffPo is a rag, but the left jumped all over Romney with the racial dog whistle bull****, and this was one example of such coverage.
 
The Sanders concern trolling is so touching.

Give me a break. Had he won you people who are posting how unfairly he was treated (how?) would be ripping him to a million pieces as the most anti-American nominee ever.

Sanders was the scariest of the three.
 
Overreact much?

200w.gif



Dude, calm down. Its a message board.

200.gif

SO...Now we have real reason to impeach (gotta LOVE that word in this instance) the whole persona of 'lawgator' as an ACLU lawyer 'jus helpin folk' you project here into the PF.

You lied when (actually IF) you pledged your oath to the Florida Bar. You do not uphold the constitution. You are unveiled. We see you more clearly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people

VN Store



Back
Top