TrumPutinGate

#9,326
#9,326
davethevol said:
This whole thing reeks of a setup. So who had something to gain by getting this meeting to take place? This is something we all need to be concerned with. Did the Russians set this up to create turmoil down the road, or did the Clintons/Obama?
Click to expand...

I think the dems did it. The Russian lawyer was denied a Visa and the Obama administration ran to the rescue and got her in the country using a diplomatic exception. All they wanted was the meeting and the associated emails in order to have something to use against him. They didn't get anything on her or they would have used it. I've asked the question numerous times with no response, what was the damning dirt they got from the Russians in regards to Hillary? There was nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,329
#9,329
InVOLuntary said:
I think the dems did it. The Russian lawyer was denied a Visa and the Obama administration ran to the rescue and got her in the country using a diplomatic exception. All they wanted was the meeting and the associated emails in order to have something to use against him. They didn't get anything on her or they would have used it. I've asked the question numerous times with no response, what was the damning dirt they got from the Russians in regards to Hillary? There was nothing.
Click to expand...

That's my thinking. And if it's the case, then Obama has to go to prison.
 
#9,330
#9,330
Septic said:
I didn't write the law. Just dropping it off here for the armchair constitutional scholars.

Though, I'd say soliciting dirt on a rival from a foreign national fits that pretty succinctly.

Would the dirt constitute "something of value"?
Click to expand...

Opinion based formula of your idea of "succinctly." It wouldn't be the first time an idea or information was used as the idea of a physical object (think insider trading)

However, I think you're stretching the idea of "something of value" a tad too much there.

Septic said:
Apparently complaints have been filed with the justice dept. Not that it'd amount to anything rich politicians don't go to jail.
Click to expand...

Of course there have been filed. Good grief, Trump farts in public and someone is there to file a complaint.
 
#9,331
#9,331
allvol123 said:
Trump Jr met with a person that was not himself and this meeting produced nothing.

I can see the intrigue.
Click to expand...

Trump Jr met with a Russian lawyer with ties to the Kremlin under the pretext that information damaging to the Clinton campaign would be supplied and he has lied about this meeting for over a year. We do not know what this meeting produced. We do know that at the time of this meeting that Russian agents had already hacked the DNC and were waiting for an opportune time to disseminate the e-mails. We now also know (thanks to Julian Assange) that Assange contacted Trump Jr today to discuss what to do next.
 
#9,332
#9,332
Septic said:
Link?

Sounds just as shady.

Maybe we should all agree that going to our enemies for political dirt to be used in a presidential election is low rent.
Click to expand...

I can agree to this only with a modification of "overseas contacts" instead of just enemies.

Doesn't mean it's going to stop happening by both sides of this equation.
 
#9,334
#9,334
BowlBrother85 said:
Trump Jr met with a Russian lawyer with ties to the Kremlin under the pretext that information damaging to the Clinton campaign would be supplied and he has lied about this meeting for over a year. We do not know what this meeting produced. We do know that at the time of this meeting that Russian agents had already hacked the DNC and were waiting for an opportune time to disseminate the e-mails. We now also know (thanks to Julian Assange) that Assange contacted Trump Jr today to discuss what to do next.
Click to expand...

When did they stuff ballot boxes?
 
#9,335
#9,335
BowlBrother85 said:
Trump Jr met with a Russian lawyer with ties to the Kremlin under the pretext that information damaging to the Clinton campaign would be supplied and he has lied about this meeting for over a year. We do not know what this meeting produced. We do know that at the time of this meeting that Russian agents had already hacked the DNC and were waiting for an opportune time to disseminate the e-mails. We now also know (thanks to Julian Assange) that Assange contacted Trump Jr today to discuss what to do next.
Click to expand...

The Russians did not hack the dnc. Period
 
#9,339
#9,339
BowlBrother85 said:
That is not what our intelligence community has concluded. Sorry, but their opinion carries more weight than yours.
Click to expand...

All 17 of them?? Lol


Seth Rich leaked it and was killed for it. The data proves it. Internet time stamps. Hell they even have his up and down speeds.

I've seen the FBI document leaked that the Feds knew he did it on the freaking 6th of July.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#9,340
#9,340
Obsessed said:
All 17 of them?? Lol


Seth Rich leaked it and was killed for it. The data proves it. Internet time stamps. Hell they even have his up and down speeds.

I've seen the FBI document leaked that the Feds knew he did it on the freaking 6th of July.
Click to expand...

The NSA, FBI, CIA and the office of the Director of National Intelligence all conducted investigations independently of each other and concluded that Russia was responsible.

The rest of your post just looks desperate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#9,341
#9,341
Oh and the FBI is reopening the Clinton investigations next week.

Seems lynch is in a lot of trouble of the previous investigation and things aren't looking to hot for the clintons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#9,342
#9,342
BowlBrother85 said:
The NSA, FBI, CIA and the office of the Director of National Intelligence all conducted investigations independently of each other and concluded that Russia was responsible.

The rest of your post just looks desperate.
Click to expand...

Denial.

What I have stated is true.
 
#9,344
#9,344
BowlBrother85 said:
The NSA, FBI, CIA and the office of the Director of National Intelligence all conducted investigations independently of each other and concluded that Russia was responsible.

The rest of your post just looks desperate.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry but you are mixing up your CNN stories. Please show me any direct quote from any of the "17" agencies that state Russia hacked the DNC servers. All of the agencies agreed that Russia attempted to hack several of the state's voting databases. This is the "Russian meddling" that we can all agree on. However to my knowledge, there has been no direct evidence to support any of the other claims. If you have a link to any of that direct evidence from the intelligence communities, please provide it or please stop with this crap even though it is very entertaining.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#9,345
#9,345
BigOrangeTrain said:
Wrong again my friend. He has been as wrong as you, LG, Velo and the others. But hey, if it makes you feel better, keep believing it.
Click to expand...

allvol123 said:
Wtf? According to volprof, Trump would have been impeached months ago.

There is literally no sign of anything illegal.
Click to expand...

Delusion befits the both of you.

For clarification, I never claimed Asterisk would be impeached months ago. At his fake election, I said that he would be out of office, one way or the other, within a year of his inauguration, and I am feeling even more confident of that now.

Also, regarding impeachment months ago, what I have been saying is that if the Grand Old Putinists had a darned patriotic bone in their bodies, they would have impeached Donny months ago. Clinton was impeached for far less offense than Donny committed in just his first month of office. Obstruction, Emoluments constitutional violations, and plenty of other crimes, all in just the first month.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,346
#9,346
825VOL said:
I'm sorry but you are mixing up your CNN stories. Please show me any direct quote from any of the "17" agencies that state Russia hacked the DNC servers. All of the agencies agreed that Russia attempted to hack several of the state's voting databases. This is the "Russian meddling" that we can all agree on. However to my knowledge, there has been no direct evidence to support any of the other claims. If you have a link to any of that direct evidence from the intelligence communities, please provide it or please stop with this crap even though it is very entertaining.
Click to expand...

Sure, here, let me share with you our IC's sources and methods just to please a rando on VolNation.
 
#9,347
#9,347
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#9,348
#9,348
davethevol said:
And just how are they able to determine that without using forensics on the DNC server? It's impossible.
Click to expand...

As a well-connected intelligence expert with relatives in the business, you know that the IC doesn't even need direct access to a server to determine such.

Of course you do.
 
#9,350
#9,350
volprof said:
Sure, here, let me share with you our IC's sources and methods just to please a rando on VolNation.
Click to expand...

Well, it seems half this board has the information already according to their posts. I am just hoping you guys will make it fair and share your top secret info with the rest of us. :)
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top