TrumPutinGate

Rant, rave, hallucinate all you want. Post ten, twenty, hell, ten thousand, threads about Pizzagate.

None of that is going to change anything, Dave.

You lost. Time to move on now.

No, you lost, which is why you and your ilk keep pushing the Russia narrative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Bump for BB.

Plus anyone else who wants to take a stab at it.

You probably have me blocked, but I've already answered this.

HUMINT, SIGINT, and the fact that the NSA doesn't have to directly obtain a server to determine such. This from actual NSA former members.

Oh, by the way, you were third place. Keep working hard, and next week, you'll get your medal, sir.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Did you see/hear about Podesta squirming over all the comments at the G-20 about his emails from the other foreign officials?

He was like a little school girl...

And he screwed up and admitted those were his emails. What happened to the DNC talking point about them being fakes?
 
You probably have me blocked, but I've already answered this.

HUMINT, SIGINT, and the fact that the NSA doesn't have to directly obtain a server to determine such. This from actual NSA former members.

Oh, by the way, you were third place. Keep working hard, and next week, you'll get your medal, sir.

Then why not turn it over to them?
 
And you're right, no one is attempting to answer it except for VP and his outrageous statement. It's an incredibly important detail.

Yeah, he's on ignore. Been that way for some time.

And no, I thank you kindly, but NO reason to quote him just so I can see it.
 
You probably have me blocked, but I've already answered this.

HUMINT, SIGINT, and the fact that the NSA doesn't have to directly obtain a server to determine such. This from actual NSA former members.

Oh, by the way, you were third place. Keep working hard, and next week, you'll get your medal, sir.

Haha, that's not true. Did Reality Winner hook you up with that golden nugget?
 
I have a feeling your eyes have been bleeding ever since Trump took office.

You are correct.

It has shook me to the core to watch all these months an illegitimate traitor, allied with our nation's greatest foreign existential threat, usurp our Republic and do his best to hand it over to global monied and foreign interests.

It's made every patriot's eyes bleed having to witness this rape.
 
I have a feeling your eyes have been bleeding ever since Trump took office.

You were correct earlier. It was a setup



In a statement, Mark Corallo added: “Specifically, we have learned that the person who sought the meeting is associated with Fusion GPS, a firm which according to public reports, was retained by Democratic operatives to develop opposition research on the President and which commissioned the phony Steele dossier.”

Fusion GPS, which is based in Washington DC and was established by former Wall Street Journal reporters Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch, found itself in the spotlight earlier this year after it emerged it was behind an “oppo research” dossier containing unproven and often salacious allegations about Mr Trump.

http://www.independent.co.uk/News/w...atalia-veselnitskaya-gps-fusion-a7834541.html
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Yes, he did... as have others.

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

Here is the link(if I did it right). I will admit when I am wrong.

We assess Russian intelligence services collected
against the US primary campaigns, think tanks, and
lobbying groups they viewed as likely to shape
future US policies. In July 2015, Russian
intelligence gained access to Democratic National
Committee (DNC) networks and maintained that
access until at least June 2016.
 The General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate
(GRU) probably began cyber operations aimed
at the US election by March 2016. We assess
that the GRU operations resulted in the
compromise of the personal e-mail accounts of
Democratic Party officials and political figures.
By May, the GRU had exfiltrated large volumes
of data from the DNC.
Public Disclosures of Russian-Collected Data.
We assess with high confidence that the GRU used
the Guccifer 2.0 persona, DCLeaks.com, and
WikiLeaks to release US victim data obtained in
This report is a declassified version of a highly classified assessment; its conclusions are identical to those in the highly classified
assessment but this version does not include the full supporting information on key elements of the influence campaign.
3
cyber operations publicly and in exclusives to
media outlets.

However it does also say that of the 3 agencies involved in this report, the FBI & CIA had high confidence and the NSA had moderate confidence in the report. With the mishandling of information and outright lies coming from sources inside these agencies, are we really supposed to take this at face value especially after what looks like direct proof of where those hacked emails actually came from?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
You were correct earlier. It was a setup



In a statement, Mark Corallo added: “Specifically, we have learned that the person who sought the meeting is associated with Fusion GPS, a firm which according to public reports, was retained by Democratic operatives to develop opposition research on the President and which commissioned the phony Steele dossier.”

Fusion GPS, which is based in Washington DC and was established by former Wall Street Journal reporters Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch, found itself in the spotlight earlier this year after it emerged it was behind an “oppo research” dossier containing unproven and often salacious allegations about Mr Trump.

http://www.independent.co.uk/News/w...atalia-veselnitskaya-gps-fusion-a7834541.html

Conservatives are going to lean hard on this "dossier defense". It's really not a defense at all but conservatives are desperate and have nothing else to cling to.
 
Never thought I'd see the day that somewhere around a quarter to a third of Americans openly defend treason because they hate the other set of Americans even more.

What a nation of spineless, sniveling little ******* we've become!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
Conservatives are going to lean hard on this "dossier defense". It's really not a defense at all but conservatives are desperate and have nothing else to cling to.

The dossier was originally funded by Republicans and has in part been confirmed. Other parts are either unverified/unverifiable or rated "Low Confidence" by Steele.

Yet, guarantee you anything, Hog will be back in here within the hour referencing it as Democrat treason again. It's what a faithful Hero of the Russian Federation does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
https://www.wired.com/2017/01/fbi-says-democratic-party-wouldnt-let-agents-see-hacked-email-servers/

In a statement to WIRED, a senior FBI law enforcement official wrote in an email Thursday that "The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated."

The possibility that the FBI based its investigation on inferior-quality evidence is significant, though, as the US government and public try to assess the intelligence community's Russia attribution
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Never thought I'd see the day that somewhere around a quarter to a third of Americans openly defend treason because they hate the other set of Americans even more.

What a nation of spineless, sniveling little ******* we've become!

Are you kidding? Liberals have been doing that for years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people

VN Store



Back
Top