TrumPutinGate

#13,006
#13,006
May not be constitutional, but it'll be interesting to see where this goes.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/890579469181825025[/twitter]
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#13,007
#13,007
Velo Vol said:
May not be constitutional, but it'll be interesting to see where this goes.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/890579469181825025[/twitter]
Click to expand...

just curious, who would they be responsible to?

I would be fine with an "and" clause. But if it is taking from the executive branch and giving to legislative branch this may not be the sure sign of YGHN you are looking for.
 
#13,011
#13,011
Velo Vol said:
May not be constitutional, but it'll be interesting to see where this goes.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/890579469181825025[/twitter]
Click to expand...

Idk who is worse, him or McCain. Both only have one agenda, start war with Russia to make money for their donors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#13,012
#13,012
https://youtu.be/L7u0y-iU82w

McCain and Graham encouraging Ukrainians to start a war with Russia. Some quotes:

"2017 will be the year of offense"-Graham

"It is time for them (Russia) to pay a heavier price"-Graham

"I am convinced you will win and we will do everything we can to provide you with what you need to win"-McCain
 
#13,019
#13,019
The House overwhelming passed the new sanctions bill, joining the Senate in what can only be described as a major rebuke to Trump and his effort to fondle Vlad Putin's rocks.

Trump opposed the legislation but lost. He'd like to veto the bill but can't because the House would easily override his veto. So he'll sign it and then turn on the Trump BS machine. He'll probably try to take credit for the idea in the first place. Since the bill also places sanctions of some kind on North Korea and Iran, you'll hear Trump say how happy he is to be cracking down on those two countries--"great day for the American people, really great. Bad countries...they're so bad." He may not mention Russia at all--but the White House BS machine will be cranked up to 'high' once he signs it; you can bet on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#13,020
#13,020
armchair said:
The House overwhelming passed the new sanctions bill, joining the Senate in what can only be described as a major rebuke to Trump and his effort to fondle Vlad Putin's rocks.

Trump opposed the legislation but lost. He'd like to veto the bill but can't because the House would easily override his veto. So he'll sign it and then turn on the Trump BS machine. He'll probably try to take credit for the idea in the first place. Since the bill also places sanctions of some kind on North Korea and Iran, you'll hear Trump say how happy he is to be cracking down on those two countries--"great day for the American people, really great. Bad countries...they're so bad." He may not mention Russia at all--but the White House BS machine will be cranked up to 'high' once he signs it; you can bet on that.
Click to expand...

Ok Mr. Educated Northern City guy...... why was the Iran deal brokered by Obama a good thing and now placing sanctions on them a good thing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#13,021
#13,021
The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee is accusing top political aides of President Obama of making hundreds of requests during the 2016 presidential race to unmask the names of Americans in intelligence reports, including Trump transition officials.

Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), in a letter to Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, said the requests were made without specific justifications on why the information was needed.

“We have found evidence that current and former government officials had easy access to U.S. person information and that it is possible that they used this information to achieve partisan political purposes, including the selective, anonymous leaking of such information,” Nunes wrote in the letter to Coats.
The letter was provided to The Hill from a source in the intelligence community.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-...-accuses-obama-aides-of-hundreds-of-unmasking
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#13,022
#13,022
Carl Pickens said:
And a ton of others too
Click to expand...

I'm confident you're correct. There is no way that enough people would have voted for him for legitimate reasons to carry him to victory. The middle finger crowd made up a large percentage of his voters and I would assume that most of those are having a serious case of buyers remorse. (I know you will all claim that is not true - but frankly, I don't believe you)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#13,023
#13,023
luthervol said:
I'm confident you're correct. There is no way that enough people would have voted for him for legitimate reasons to carry him to victory. The middle finger crowd made up a large percentage of his voters and I would assume that most of those are having a serious case of buyers remorse. (I know you will all claim that is not true - but frankly, I don't believe you)
Click to expand...

Why is Trumps legitimate win so hard for you to grasp? When you look at it, most of us know why Obama won. Its not like there were any real legitimate reasons he should have won in 2008.

Your assumptions are laughable. Especially seeings how he hasnt even been in office a year yet. You can continue to assume, as long as you can continue to handle you being wrong.
 
#13,025
#13,025
luthervol said:
I'm confident you're correct. There is no way that enough people would have voted for him for legitimate reasons to carry him to victory. The middle finger crowd made up a large percentage of his voters and I would assume that most of those are having a serious case of buyers remorse. (I know you will all claim that is not true - but frankly, I don't believe you)
Click to expand...
I don't have buyers remorse in the least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top