TrumPutinGate

I'm confident you're correct. There is no way that enough people would have voted for him for legitimate reasons to carry him to victory. The middle finger crowd made up a large percentage of his voters and I would assume that most of those are having a serious case of buyers remorse. (I know you will all claim that is not true - but frankly, I don't believe you)

I didn't vote for him because I didn't have to..... I have no remorse regarding him winning the election..... let's say nothing gets passed during his term.... that's not necessarily a bad thing. We don't need laws passed for the sake of passing laws.
 
Why is Trumps legitimate win so hard for you to grasp? When you look at it, most of us know why Obama won. Its not like there were any real legitimate reasons he should have won in 2008.

Your assumptions are laughable. Especially seeings how he hasnt even been in office a year yet. You can continue to assume, as long as you can continue to handle you being wrong.

We've had posters on this board say they voted for him as a way of giving the middle finger to both parties and voted for him only because they couldn't vote for Clinton. Not many people have admitted to voting for him because they thought he would be a good president.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
http://nypost.com/2017/06/24/inside-the-shadowy-intelligence-firm-behind-the-trump-dossier/

..."What is the company hiding? Fusion GPS describes itself as a “research and strategic intelligence firm” founded by “three former Wall Street Journal investigative reporters.” But congressional sources say it’s actually an opposition-research group for Democrats, and the founders, who are more political activists than journalists, have a pro-Hillary Clinton, anti-Trump agenda."...

But but but but
 

Attachments

  • TRUMP RUSSIA.jpg
    TRUMP RUSSIA.jpg
    53.7 KB · Views: 0
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee is accusing top political aides of President Obama of making hundreds of requests during the 2016 presidential race to unmask the names of Americans in intelligence reports, including Trump transition officials.

Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), in a letter to Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, said the requests were made without specific justifications on why the information was needed.

“We have found evidence that current and former government officials had easy access to U.S. person information and that it is possible that they used this information to achieve partisan political purposes, including the selective, anonymous leaking of such information,” Nunes wrote in the letter to Coats.
The letter was provided to The Hill from a source in the intelligence community.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-...-accuses-obama-aides-of-hundreds-of-unmasking

Paging Jeff Sessions....

I don't blame Trump for his frustrations w Sessions, despite the way he handled it
 
pretty sure each host country can do this. but lets make this all about Trumpingate

True or False: This is Trump's position?

C1mwqAFVIAAQ-nD.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
http://nypost.com/2017/06/24/inside-the-shadowy-intelligence-firm-behind-the-trump-dossier/

..."What is the company hiding? Fusion GPS describes itself as a “research and strategic intelligence firm” founded by “three former Wall Street Journal investigative reporters.” But congressional sources say it’s actually an opposition-research group for Democrats, and the founders, who are more political activists than journalists, have a pro-Hillary Clinton, anti-Trump agenda."...

But but but but

These are the guys who are trying to ignore a subpoena as well..

Weird that all the "russian collusion" types answer questions but not the "democrat fake dossier creating" ones...hmm

Whats the phrase..where there is smoke...?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I wonder why anyone would suspect this?

[twitter]https://twitter.com/PhilipRucker/status/890970086445649920[/twitter]
 
My point being that even his "deal making" with Russia isn't bringing any tangible benefits (other than to him).

What deals has he made. Russia is responding to the congressional bill increasing sanctions. Everyone knew they would take some action.
 
We've had posters on this board say they voted for him as a way of giving the middle finger to both parties and voted for him only because they couldn't vote for Clinton. Not many people have admitted to voting for him because they thought he would be a good president.
Not giving the middle finger to both parties certainly doesn't make one a good President. Going along with either of them creates more problems than it solves.
 
My point being that even his "deal making" with Russia isn't bringing any tangible benefits (other than to him).

Hmmm, I guess you are like the other liberals. Dont really give Trump a chance or time to do anything.

What benefits is he specifically getting?

Also, just because his Russia deals aren't bringing any tangible benefits at the moment (in your opinion), does that mean they wont ever be beneficial?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Can the libs in her explain to me how the Russians prevented Hillary from campaigning in Michigan and Wisconsin?

They cannot even explain how Russia intevened with anything. They believe whatever CNN, the NYT or Huff post feeds them. Thats all they have. They still cannot handle the fact that Trump legitimately won the presidency and need to find any excuse to ease the pain of loss.

I mean it was funny at first. Now, it just makes them look petty and pathetic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people

VN Store



Back
Top