TrumPutinGate

#14,926
#14,926
golfballs said:
http://amp.dailycaller.com/2017/09/...n-why-mueller-is-investigating-michael-flynn/

Wtf does this have to do with "Trump/Russia collusion" to 'hack the election'?

Investigation has gone off the rails
Click to expand...


Because one problem which has repeatedly come up is that Trump campaign officials were being paid to represent foreign powers or interests and not telling anyone that they had such an agenda.

You have to remember, Trump was coming from a world where he knew what everyone wanted. Part of his success was that he could manipulate people based on their business interests. He found himself in an arena where he did not know who was who, and was easily himself fooled into thinking people had good motives to do what they were doing, only to find out that he was being cajoled into taking policy positions by forces that he did not even know existed, much less than people close to him were on their payroll.

That's one of the risks of nominating and voting for a complete outsider. Especially one who has shown a propensity to make snap judgments and poor ones, at that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14,927
#14,927
MG1968 said:
The Cambridge police acted stupidly.

You didn’t build that.

Clinging to guns and religion.

Now let me be clear.
Click to expand...

if I had a son

you can keep your plan

any number of the times he jumped on the cops before ANY facts came out
 
#14,928
#14,928
Outside of his purview. Waste of tax dollars
[twitter]https://twitter.com/thehill/status/915269515554037762[/twitter]
 
#14,929
#14,929
#14,930
#14,930
golfballs said:
Outside of his purview. Waste of tax dollars
[twitter]https://twitter.com/thehill/status/915269515554037762[/twitter]
Click to expand...

There is nothing wrong with his office looking at the legal interpretations of the law concerning the precedent and limitation to the power of a presidential pardon
 
#14,931
#14,931
[twitter]https://twitter.com/Amy_Siskind/status/914942346248249346[/twitter]

[twitter]https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/915221760202739718[/twitter]
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14,932
#14,932
carlos86 said:
There is nothing wrong with his office looking at the legal interpretations of the law concerning the precedent and limitation to the power of a presidential pardon
Click to expand...

What Trump might or might not do after they have concluded the case is irrelevant to the actual case.
 
#14,933
#14,933
carlos86 said:
There is nothing wrong with his office looking at the legal interpretations of the law concerning the precedent and limitation to the power of a presidential pardon
Click to expand...

There is no limitation to the Presidents power to pardon (federal crimes).
 
#14,938
#14,938
MT LeConte said:
He wouldn't, that's what I'm saying. If he pardons someone it is proof of their guilt. You guys keep saying there's nothing to see here.
Click to expand...

Not necessarily. But in any case I don't think he would pardon anyone until at least charges are filed.
 
#14,939
#14,939
Long update from the Senate Intel Committee. Mostly a report of what they've been doing.

No hint about evidence of collusion though they did talk in specifics about other things (eg. state hacking of election HQs, fake social media, etc.)

The only statement about collusion came from Warner who limited his comments to the Don Jr. meeting (something we already knew).

Burr ended with quite a bit of detail about how Steele (the author of the dossier) is refusing to cooperate with the committee and they cannot confirm even through our intelligence agencies the veracity of any of the information prior to June 2016. He hinted subpoena's may be coming.
 
#14,940
#14,940
volinbham said:
Long update from the Senate Intel Committee. Mostly a report of what they've been doing.

No hint about evidence of collusion though they did talk in specifics about other things (eg. state hacking of election HQs, fake social media, etc.)

The only statement about collusion came from Warner who limited his comments to the Don Jr. meeting (something we already knew).

Burr ended with quite a bit of detail about how Steele (the author of the dossier) is refusing to cooperate with the committee and they cannot confirm even through our intelligence agencies the veracity of any of the information prior to June 2016. He hinted subpoena's may be coming.
Click to expand...

[twitter]https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/915699078704566277[/twitter]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14,941
#14,941
volinbham said:
Long update from the Senate Intel Committee. Mostly a report of what they've been doing.

No hint about evidence of collusion though they did talk in specifics about other things (eg. state hacking of election HQs, fake social media, etc.)

The only statement about collusion came from Warner who limited his comments to the Don Jr. meeting (something we already knew).

Burr ended with quite a bit of detail about how Steele (the author of the dossier) is refusing to cooperate with the committee and they cannot confirm even through our intelligence agencies the veracity of any of the information prior to June 2016. He hinted subpoena's may be coming.
Click to expand...

So...

Not soon? Will we get Gruden before the collusion sticks?
 
#14,942
#14,942
volinbham said:
Long update from the Senate Intel Committee. Mostly a report of what they've been doing.

No hint about evidence of collusion though they did talk in specifics about other things (eg. state hacking of election HQs, fake social media, etc.)

The only statement about collusion came from Warner who limited his comments to the Don Jr. meeting (something we already knew).

Burr ended with quite a bit of detail about how Steele (the author of the dossier) is refusing to cooperate with the committee and they cannot confirm even through our intelligence agencies the veracity of any of the information prior to June 2016. He hinted subpoena's may be coming.
Click to expand...

This is a huge waste of time and resources. Chasing around a fantasy concocted by Democrats to make excuses for Hillary's loss.

It's been great fun watching so many suckers here on the forum swallowing the bait.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14,944
#14,944
Grand Vol said:
So...

Not soon? Will we get Gruden before the collusion sticks?
Click to expand...

Warner had nothing to say and no one is leaking any findings. I'm betting they have nothing and are hanging on the Don Jr. failed meeting as the best they have on the collusion angle.

Much of the collusion allegations are grounded in the dossier and for some reason the author won't cooperate and US Intel (via testimony) has not been able to corroborate.

Burr says no determination of collusion and Warner did not object to that statement. Hope to wrap up investigation by end of year. They've talked to all the intel people and all the Obama people who had any involvement.

Mueller may find something but looking doubtful that the collusion charge has legs.
 
Last edited:
#14,945
#14,945
This is like watching a team down 5 touchdowns at halftime. That has to kick off to the team that is kicking their tail, to start the second half. The outcome is inevitable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14,947
#14,947
volinbham said:
And? It should be investigated including by the Senate Intel Committee but they are being stonewalled.

Wonder why?
Click to expand...

Because House Intelligence sent people to the UK to find him without notifying the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence who were in talks with him to testify.
 
#14,949
#14,949
carlos86 said:
[twitter]https://twitter.com/kendilaniannbc/status/915925726871900160[/twitter]
Click to expand...

trump is a man who ran for president. and russia does in fact exist. We are still trying to verify if Putin does actually speak Russian or runs that country.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top