TrumPutinGate

Over $100 million on golf, Mueller is spending one tenth of that. And let's don't even get into the dozen Benghazi investigations which netted zero indictments.
The purpose of the Benghazi investigation was not to indict anyone. It was to uncover the truth.
 
It just keeps unraveling

Interesting, swings and misses by the GOP now constitute the "unraveling" of the Mueller probe? Seems like Nunes, Jeffries and their not ready for prime time crew have thrown of bunch of s**t at the wall, but nothing has really stuck.
 
Interesting, swings and misses by the GOP now constitute the "unraveling" of the Mueller probe? Seems like Nunes, Jeffries and their not ready for prime time crew have thrown of bunch of s**t at the wall, but nothing has really stuck.
Kinda like 10 year old known finance crimes suddenly being a threat to our Repub... Er Democracy.
 
lol...Are you serious? That's not how it works.

1. The evidence is released at the conclusion. If the proof was public, Trump would already be impeached.

2. Just because there is an investigation doesn't mean that proof will be found. If so, why investigate? The person would obviously be guilty at the onset.

3. Just because proof isn't found, doesn't mean the person is innocent. (think O.J.)

4. Mueller had every right and responsibility to follow where ever the investigation led.

I'm happy to wait on the conclusion of the investigation and look at the evidence. You?

Ironic that it led to Manafort's income taxes from over a decade ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
lol...Are you serious? That's not how it works.

1. The evidence is released at the conclusion. If the proof was public, Trump would already be impeached.

2. Just because there is an investigation doesn't mean that proof will be found. If so, why investigate? The person would obviously be guilty at the onset.

3. Just because proof isn't found, doesn't mean the person is innocent. (think O.J.)

4. Mueller had every right and responsibility to follow where ever the investigation led.

I'm happy to wait on the conclusion of the investigation and look at the evidence. You?

Yes, I'm serious.
So you said the investigation is on point. So where is it on point? Your response to my comment is very similar to Pelosi's "you have to pass it to know what's in it". The judge in the Manafort trail had it right, it's just an expedition to get a conviction to try and get a person to "roll over" on Trump. If the investigators had hard evidence, they wouldn't need to squeeze Manafort, Cohen and who knows who else.

The longer this goes on the less confidence I have that this is on point.
 
Yes, I'm serious.
So you said the investigation is on point. So where is it on point? Your response to my comment is very similar to Pelosi's "you have to pass it to know what's in it". The judge in the Manafort trail had it right, it's just an expedition to get a conviction to try and get a person to "roll over" on Trump. If the investigators had hard evidence, they wouldn't need to squeeze Manafort, Cohen and who knows who else.

The longer this goes on the less confidence I have that this is on point.

It's 100% selective prosecution which everyone should be against.

An investigation in search of a crime.
 
What exactly does/did Manafort's taxes from the mid-late 2000s have to do with Russian collusion/ influence on the 2016 election?

The same reason he hid them from the Government. Hint: He was working for Russia and wanted to keep it a secret.
 
😂😂 Yuge that was. Bigly even.

It may be bigger than you think. You are always downplaying what is happening in the investigation. But know this he has a deal with Mueller to cooperate. Some interesting things I noted was he facilitated meetings with members of congress and the Executive branch with a Russian. It could be a Nunesburger.
 

VN Store



Back
Top