TrumPutinGate

#1,854
#1,854
Carl Pickens said:
The liberals are acting like the idiots they are. Has anyone suggested Podesta should have used a more secure password?
Click to expand...

How dare you, Russian puppet.

They sent him an email from an address like "admin@geemail.com" saying he needed to tell them his password and he did. "Password"

Maybe he deserved it
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,859
#1,859
Velo Vol said:
Over/under on how long Nunes remains part of the House Russia investigation?
Click to expand...

The obama administration is going to be lucky if they are not brought up on charges. That drum you are beating, may end up slapping you in the mouth. (Real damn hard)
 
#1,862
#1,862
It seems that lately there is a massive form of group amnesia coming from the Obama and Hillary fans, as well as shills who work for the DNC. Or as it has been referred a lot lately by many, there is some massive "cognitive dissonance" coming from the anti-Trump crowd, when they keep trying to claim "there is no evidence for President Trump claiming he was wiretapped, and much less by the Obama administration...

To remind those who are plagued by this massive "cognitive dissonance", or group amnesia, here is a video trying to remind people that left-wing media sources started these claims which now the anti-Trump crowd and the same left-wing media proclaim "there is no evidence for the statements made by President Trump.




At about 3 minutes into the video, Congressman Trey Gowdy states the following facts.

"In January 2017 the Washington Post reported: "According to a senior U.S. government official, a named U.S. citizen, and I would not use the name. A named U.S. citizen phoned the Russian ambassador several times on December the 29th. On February of this year the Washington Post reported nine....nine current and former officials, who were in senior positions at multiple agencies at the time of the calls, spoke on a condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters, and that officials began pouring over intelligence reports, intercepted communications and diplomatic papers."

"In February of this year the New York Times reported, a U.S. citizen, whose name I would not use, discusses sanctions with a Russian ambassador in a phone call. According to officials who have seen a transcript of the wire..tapped conversation. And again in February of this year the New York Times reported on a phone call involving a U.S. citizen. Including significant discussions, of phone records, intercepted calls, intercepted communications and reported the NSA captured calls, and then asked the FBI to collect as much information as possible."
 
#1,864
#1,864
Obsessed said:
It seems that lately there is a massive form of group amnesia coming from the Obama and Hillary fans, as well as shills who work for the DNC. Or as it has been referred a lot lately by many, there is some massive "cognitive dissonance" coming from the anti-Trump crowd, when they keep trying to claim "there is no evidence for President Trump claiming he was wiretapped, and much less by the Obama administration...

To remind those who are plagued by this massive "cognitive dissonance", or group amnesia, here is a video trying to remind people that left-wing media sources started these claims which now the anti-Trump crowd and the same left-wing media proclaim "there is no evidence for the statements made by President Trump.




At about 3 minutes into the video, Congressman Trey Gowdy states the following facts.

"In January 2017 the Washington Post reported: "According to a senior U.S. government official, a named U.S. citizen, and I would not use the name. A named U.S. citizen phoned the Russian ambassador several times on December the 29th. On February of this year the Washington Post reported nine....nine current and former officials, who were in senior positions at multiple agencies at the time of the calls, spoke on a condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters, and that officials began pouring over intelligence reports, intercepted communications and diplomatic papers."

"In February of this year the New York Times reported, a U.S. citizen, whose name I would not use, discusses sanctions with a Russian ambassador in a phone call. According to officials who have seen a transcript of the wire..tapped conversation. And again in February of this year the New York Times reported on a phone call involving a U.S. citizen. Including significant discussions, of phone records, intercepted calls, intercepted communications and reported the NSA captured calls, and then asked the FBI to collect as much information as possible."
Click to expand...

You're embarrassing..If you wanna quote the nytimes please be more accurate and timely:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/23/...-trump-misleads-surveillance-wiretapping.html

"Mr. Trump repeatedly referred to the article as proof for his claim.

“On front page of The New York Times, OK? It’s in the title of the front page. And I would like you to officially — I know you are going to write a bad article because you always do —[mention] wiretap data used in inquiry of Trump aides.”

This is misleading. Neither the print nor online version of the article supports Mr. Trump’s accusation that Mr. Obama ordered surveillance on him.

The Times reported that there were intercepted conversations involving Mr. Trump’s associates, but it did not report that they or Mr. Trump were the subject of wiretap orders. To date, The Times has not found evidence of that.

Mr. Trump’s initial accusations specifically targeted Mr. Obama, whom The Times article does not mention. The independent fact-checking website PolitiFact rated Mr. Trump’s assertion False, and The Washington Post awarded the claim Four Pinocchios, its lowest rating, twice.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#1,865
#1,865
newarkvol said:
You're embarrassing..If you wanna quote the nytimes please be more accurate and timely:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/23/...-trump-misleads-surveillance-wiretapping.html

"Mr. Trump repeatedly referred to the article as proof for his claim.

“On front page of The New York Times, OK? It’s in the title of the front page. And I would like you to officially — I know you are going to write a bad article because you always do —[mention] wiretap data used in inquiry of Trump aides.”

This is misleading. Neither the print nor online version of the article supports Mr. Trump’s accusation that Mr. Obama ordered surveillance on him.

The Times reported that there were intercepted conversations involving Mr. Trump’s associates, but it did not report that they or Mr. Trump were the subject of wiretap orders. To date, The Times has not found evidence of that.

Mr. Trump’s initial accusations specifically targeted Mr. Obama, whom The Times article does not mention. The independent fact-checking website PolitiFact rated Mr. Trump’s assertion False, and The Washington Post awarded the claim Four Pinocchios, its lowest rating, twice.
Click to expand...

Did you watch the video?
 
#1,867
#1,867
Did anyone here mention that Jared Kushner met with executives of a sanctioned Russian bank after the election?

That seems pretty significant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#1,868
#1,868
Obsessed said:
Did you watch the video?
Click to expand...
I saw no linked video in your post, although I am sure it exists and Gowdy is spouting unsubstantiated inanities---I really do not have time to find the outdated OBSESSED equivalent of the Zapruder film---You have 30,000+ posts...don't you have Anything better to do..Like making amurica great again...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#1,869
#1,869
newarkvol said:
I saw no linked video in your post, although I am sure it exists and Gowdy is spouting unsubstantiated inanities---I really do not have time to find the outdated OBSESSED equivalent of the Zapruder film---You have 30,000+ posts...don't you have Anything better to do..Like making amurica great again...
Click to expand...

The moment you noticed the poster is a flaming liberal dimocrat.
 
#1,870
#1,870
newarkvol said:
I saw no linked video in your post, although I am sure it exists and Gowdy is spouting unsubstantiated inanities---I really do not have time to find the outdated OBSESSED equivalent of the Zapruder film---You have 30,000+ posts...don't you have Anything better to do..Like making amurica great again...
Click to expand...

Just wait. It's coming....
 
#1,871
#1,871
Velo Vol said:
Did anyone here mention that Jared Kushner met with executives of a sanctioned Russian bank after the election?

That seems pretty significant.
Click to expand...

Yeah I saw that...we could also reference :

or this: Kushners May Get $400 Million From Chinese on Tower...https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...get-400-million-from-chinese-on-marquee-tower

or this...TRUMP FAMILY OPENLY BOASTS ABOUT ENRICHMENT OFF THE PRESIDENCY https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/09/us/politics/trump-golf-courses.html

or this..CHINA GRANTS 38 NEW TRUMP TRADEMARKS
Business Insider, 2 weeks
http://www.businessinsider.com/ap-c...ry-approval-to-38-new-trump-trademarks-2017-3

or thisAP Exclusive: Before Trump job, Manafort worked to aid Putinhttps://apnews.com/122ae0b5848345faa88108a03de40c5a/Manafort%27s-plan-to-%27greatly-benefit-the-Putin-Government

or thisROSS OWNS SHIPPING FIRM WHILE SHEPHERDING TRUMP’S TRADE POLICY
https://www.pri.org/stories/2017-03...trade-policy-should-he-also-own-shipping-firm

or thisPaul Manafort, Former Trump Campaign Chief, Faces New Allegations in Ukraine
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/20/world/europe/paul-manafort-ukraine-allegations-trump.html
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#1,872
#1,872
Obsessed said:
The obama administration is going to be lucky if they are not brought up on charges. That drum you are beating, may end up slapping you in the mouth. (Real damn hard)
Click to expand...

There's also something I don't get about this. The "plot," as I understand it, is:

1. The Obama White House illegally wiretapped Trump.

2. They gathered information on Trump.

3. They then did nothing with it, they sat on it until after the election/inauguration,

4. When mysterious operatives started leaking it.

That's not a very cunning plan.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#1,874
#1,874
Velo Vol said:
There's also something I don't get about this. The "plot," as I understand it, is:

1. The Obama White House illegally wiretapped Trump.

2. They gathered information on Trump.

3. They then did nothing with it, they sat on it until after the election/inauguration,

4. When mysterious operatives started leaking it.

That's not a very cunning plan.
Click to expand...
Just wait....
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top