TrumPutinGate

But your argument means nobody can be charged now.


Each case has to be evaluated on its own merits.

Horsesh!t .. if you lie to Congress then you should be held accountable if that’s the law . When you start “ tinkering “ with it is when you get into trouble with bias . Did clapper lie ? Yep and he should have been charged but he wasn’t and allowed to go until the SOL ran out . So why is he better than anybody else?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RockyTop85
Horsesh!t .. if you lie to Congress then you should be held accountable if that’s the law . When you start “ tinkering “ with it is when you get into trouble with bias . Did clapper lie ? Yep and he should have been charged but he wasn’t and allowed to go until the SOL ran out . So why is he better than anybody else?

CW is about to make a crack about banging your wife. It’s all he has.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0nelilreb
Oh good--legal scholar Piers Morgan has finally weighed in.

I guess he resolved his Twitter spat with Ariana Grande?
 
CW is about to make a crack about banging your wife. It’s all he has.

Mine likes lawyers less than I do and it would be really dangerous adventure considering the access to all the needles and drugs she has . LOL
 
Horsesh!t .. if you lie to Congress then you should be held accountable if that’s the law . When you start “ tinkering “ with it is when you get into trouble with bias . Did clapper lie ? Yep and he should have been charged but he wasn’t and allowed to go until the SOL ran out . So why is he better than anybody else?
Give me a break.
Speeding is breaking the law, lots of LEOs will turn a blind eye to 3 mph over the limit but not 20 mph. Are you saying they shouldn't be allowed to "tinker"?
Tax fraud is a crime. If you value a donated bag of clothing at $200 that should have been valued at $50, the IRS will probably not come after you as hard as they do the person that fails to report $250k in income. Are you saying they should not be allowed to "tinker" with their enforcement?
Child abuse is a crime. Sending your child to bed without dinner, not allowing your child to eat for two days, and not allowing your child to eat for two months will all be "tinkered" with differently. Are you saying they should be treated with the same severity?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Silence Dogood
lol.....Don't fool yourself; that is not why he is despised. He receives 90% negative coverage because he is a despicable human who earns the negative coverage.

You're going to need to cite evidence to support this nonsense.

For example, why don't you list the top 10 policies, executive orders, changes made by Trump administration to support your claim.

I'll wait.
 
bg112918dAPR20181129044857.jpg
 
You're going to need to cite evidence to support this nonsense.

For example, why don't you list the top 10 policies, executive orders, changes made by Trump administration to support your claim.

I'll wait.
Hate to tell you, but you're waiting in the wrong line.
We are all drowning in empirical evidence. He was hated before he took office ("lock her up", "build that wall", "Lyin' Ted", "Little Marco" type lunacy) and he was more hated the day he took office (sending Spicer out to blatantly lie and escalate the calculated war on the press because he was embarrassed by his tiny inaugural turnout ) He was reviled even more the day Bannon stepped foot into the White House. The level of disgust rises with each idiotic tweet, use of a childish nickname, and buffoonish insult. He's a moron, and he's dangerous, and he's ultimately a cancer to our nation that causes more damage every day it continues to exist.

His policies are secondary at this point. He's like a physically and emotionally abusive husband who thinks if he buys his wife nice things, all should be good.,
Some women can live with that (redhats), and some get the he!! out (libtards).
 
You're going to need to cite evidence to support this nonsense.

For example, why don't you list the top 10 policies, executive orders, changes made by Trump administration to support your claim.

I'll wait.


Again... from the guy who believes the anonymous 4 chan poster.

Are you trying to be ironic?
 
  • Like
Reactions: titansvolsfaninga
lol.......Why did she not increase security?
Good question. Why did the State Department, of which she was the head, deny additional security requests in an area where it was vitally needed? Why did they decide it was important to keep a low profile rather than protect American citizens? I'm not sure an adequate answer has ever been provided.
 
Give me a break.
Speeding is breaking the law, lots of LEOs will turn a blind eye to 3 mph over the limit but not 20 mph. Are you saying they shouldn't be allowed to "tinker"?
Tax fraud is a crime. If you value a donated bag of clothing at $200 that should have been valued at $50, the IRS will probably not come after you as hard as they do the person that fails to report $250k in income. Are you saying they should not be allowed to "tinker" with their enforcement?
Child abuse is a crime. Sending your child to bed without dinner, not allowing your child to eat for two days, and not allowing your child to eat for two months will all be "tinkered" with differently. Are you saying they should be treated with the same severity?

Ok then as long as we are all on the same page here Luther ... lying to Congress is not a big deal and only the ones that draw the short straw will be punished for it , others that do it will just be allowed to do it .
 
That is a crock of ****. I don't know what planet you lived on but I remember blacks couldn't go to school where I did. Couldn't use the restrooms or water fountains. Sat on the back of the busses if they even had the money to ride. The ones who did have a job were carrying mops, not brief cases. There were exactly NONE on my sports teams. The white middle class prospered but the poor and especially blacks didn't fare well at all. The poor kids in my class didn't have decent clothes to wear to school. Some didn't even have warm coats for the winter.

Yeah, let's go back to that magical time.
Why don't you go back to 1760 when 10% of the residents of Philadelphia were slaves? Or, did you think they were just in the South? In 1804, the Vice President, Aaron Burr of new York , owned slaves.

Benjamin Franklin travelled with one or two slaves until he later became an abolitionist. Providence Rhode Island was the center of slave importation. In New Orleans in 1830, there were 10,689 free blacks, and nearly one third of them bought, rented, and sold black slaves. In 1840, in Charleston, S.C. there 402 black slave owners with 2,357 black slaves. Look it up.

P.S. It's not a crock of sh!t. What I posted about the 1950's , as it relates to my mother, happened in East Tn. just as I said.
 
Ok then as long as we are all on the same page here Luther ... lying to Congress is not a big deal and only the ones that draw the short straw will be punished for it , others that do it will just be allowed to do it .

You still aren't getting my point. You've said since Clapper wasn't charged these people shouldn't. Where does that logic end?
 
Dude you linked an article above quoting Dershowitz and basically called him a red hat. Just sayin’

If he said that exposing a crime is the same as committing a crime then he has the mentality of a red hat. Perhaps he's had a stroke, perhaps he's a closet trump nuthugger. Either way, it's titanically stupid.
 
Mueller has tortured enough Minnows and made enough noise but if he hasn’t got the goods to nail Trump the Whale by now he should shut up shop and go home

Donald Trump has never made any secret that he enjoys doing business with Russians.

When I interviewed him for GQ magazine in 2008, he told me how he’d recently made a $60 million profit on a house in Florida that way.

‘I have stuff they (Russians) want to buy,’ he said. ‘I bought a house in Palm Beach for $40 million and just sold it to a Russian for $100 million. They’re very smart, very cunning business people. They know great assets when they see them. And they know exactly what they’re doing when they hand me a big fat check. I am getting a good price but in five years I will probably regret it.’

That house sale was ten years ago, and was well publicized in the media at the time.

I was reminded of this yesterday when it was revealed that Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen has done a deal with Special Counsel Robert Mueller as part of the Russia Collusion investigation.

PIERS MORGAN: If Mueller hasn’t got the goods to nail Trump by now he should shut up shop & go home | Daily Mail Online
The sentence which I placed in bold is dead wrong ("Donald Trump has never made any secret that he enjoys doing business with Russians.") and such an erroneous statement puts everything else in question as well... Throughout the 2016 Presidential campaign, candidate Donald Trump repeatedly claimed that aside from the Miss Universe Pageant, he had no business dealings in Russia; nor did he have any business deals pending in Russia. In his own words, he said that he had "stayed away". That was simply a lie. Every indication we have now, is that Trump Tower Moscow was a high priority for him, at least until June of 2016.
 
You still aren't getting my point. You've said since Clapper wasn't charged these people shouldn't. Where does that logic end?

You aren’t understand mine , I only used clapper as an example . I believe if you lie to Congress you should pay the penalty . Period .
 
Hate to tell you, but you're waiting in the wrong line.
We are all drowning in empirical evidence. He was hated before he took office ("lock her up", "build that wall", "Lyin' Ted", "Little Marco" type lunacy) and he was more hated the day he took office (sending Spicer out to blatantly lie and escalate the calculated war on the press because he was embarrassed by his tiny inaugural turnout ) He was reviled even more the day Bannon stepped foot into the White House. The level of disgust rises with each idiotic tweet, use of a childish nickname, and buffoonish insult. He's a moron, and he's dangerous, and he's ultimately a cancer to our nation that causes more damage every day it continues to exist.

His policies are secondary at this point. He's like a physically and emotionally abusive husband who thinks if he buys his wife nice things, all should be good.,
Some women can live with that (redhats), and some get the he!! out (libtards).

I see your programming is quite extensive. I'm impressed.

You are literally parroting everything the MSM news media has said since 2015.
 
Yes, but you appear to be arguing since those guys weren't charged these guys should be given a pass

Bigger point should be selective outrage. Both parties are guilty of letting things slide as long as it benefits them in some way. Both parties are also guilty of raising high hell about who gets away with what. Politics is full of inconsistency. Corruption is rampant in both parties, but partisans continue to deny their side is indeed corrupt.

Honestly, Trump is not a good guy. He never should have been nominated, let along elected. But in that same breath, Hillary should have never been nominated either. Yet both parties refuse to acknowledge this simple truth. It's sad we've reached a point in politics where America had to choose between two horrible candidates.
 

VN Store



Back
Top