TrumPutinGate

#21,301
#21,301
C-south said:
Maybe we should just send Russia a few pallets of cash because that’s ok. Maybe Donnie told them he could be more flexible after he was elected. That’s cool too.
Click to expand...


Trump is compromised by the Russians. The sooner you face facts, the less painful it will be for you when he is ousted from office.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#21,302
#21,302
NorthDallas40 said:
“A previous version of this article misidentified the people to whom Paul Manafort wanted a Russian associate to send polling data. Mr. Manafort wanted the data sent to two Ukrainian oligarchs, Serhiy Lyovochkin and Rinat Akhmetov, not Oleg V. Deripaska, a Russian oligarch close to the Kremlin.”
Click to expand...

I don't know anything about him, but it must have been useful.

 
#21,312
#21,312
Fun coupon VOL said:
I really don’t care either way.

If they acted with Russia to help their cause in the election, lock them up. If not, get off the pot and release the report. The amount of time and money this has taken is ridiculous.
Click to expand...
Has anyone taken the time to define what "interfere with an election" (or "tamper", or whatever is an illegal activity per elections) actually means? It's illegal for a foreign power to "interfere" with our elections?

Does that mean releasing information to the public? It seems by that definition, just running for election and stumping would be "interference" or tampering.
 
#21,313
#21,313
C-south said:
Lol. YGHN. After redactions it’ll probably look like this. View attachment 188324
Click to expand...

Neal Katyal wrote the special counsel regulations. I think he knows more than you.

“1.The special counsel rules, which I drafted at DOJ 20 years ago, contemplate 2 kinds of reports. One is a report from Mueller to the AG, at the close of his investigation: “a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel. 2. That document is to be confidential. But there is a second, separate reporting requirement, which forces the AG to notify Congress “with an explanation for each action…upon conclusion of the Special Counsel’s investigation, including a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the AG concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued. That report must explain why the investigation has concluded, and any instance in which the AG overruled the Special Counsel. The provision was designed to ensure “Congressional and public confidence in the integrity of the process.”
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top