TrumPutinGate

#21,256
#21,256
carlos86 said:
This is for all the people that keep responding with “Polling data the horror!”


Click to expand...


Yes, this is the best indication yet that there was collusion. I believe there was always speculation as to how Russia knew where to direct their ads and social media posts. This could help us get to that answer.
 
#21,258
#21,258
evillawyer said:
Yes, this is the best indication yet that there was collusion. I believe there was always speculation as to how Russia knew where to direct their ads and social media posts. This could help us get to that answer.
Click to expand...
Cambridge Analytica has something to do with this part of the conspiracy as well
 
#21,260
#21,260
They keep throwing out whatever they can too overshadow their illegal FISA warrant problems. They broke laws and we know it. Trump knows it. If the idiots keep poking the hive Trump will declassify everything.

In the end he still wins fools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirVol, Carl Pickens and volfanjustin
#21,262
#21,262
Fun coupon VOL said:
What polling data? Which source is it coming from? Is that already public information?
Click to expand...

Manafort and Gatesgave Konstantin V. Kilimnik, a known Russian Intelligence operative the Trump campaigns internal polling data. They then told Kilimnik to pass said polling data on to Oleg V. Deripaska who at one time employed Manafort and is also a close associate of Putin’s. He’s is known as Vladimir Putin’s favorite oligarch. This is all public as of yesterday because Manafort’s lawyers don’t know how to properly redact information.
 
#21,264
#21,264
carlos86 said:
Manafort and Gatesgave Konstantin V. Kilimnik, a known Russian Intelligence operative the Trump campaigns internal polling data. They then told Kilimnik to pass said polling data on to Oleg V. Deripaska who at one time employed Manafort and is also a close associate of Putin’s. He’s is known as Vladimir Putin’s favorite oligarch. This is all public as of yesterday because Manafort’s lawyers don’t know how to properly redact information.
Click to expand...

Okay so why is this illegal?

Thanks for the answer.
 
#21,266
#21,266
evillawyer said:
Foreign powers interfering with us election is illegal. If you're in a conspiracy with said foreign power to influence the election and aid that foreign power in it's efforts, that's also illegal.
Click to expand...

How does providing data correlate with interfering in the us election?

If I say based on our data we are ahead, here take a look. Is that illegal? Doesn’t seem to be unless acted upon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin
#21,267
#21,267
Fun coupon VOL said:
How does providing data correlate with interfering in the us election?

If I say based on our data we are ahead, here take a look. Is that illegal? Doesn’t seem to be unless acted upon.
Click to expand...

No one really knows how detailed the polling data was. Campaigns usually pay a lot for really detailed polling data that allows them to target particular voters. This is not generic CBS/NBC/CNN type polling data. If Manafort gave the Russians this very detailed data it may have allowed the Russians to better target their social media campaigns that aided Trump.
 
#21,268
#21,268
It seems like this is the same situation that Bruce P. was in when he lied to the NCAA. Don’t lie slap on the wrist. You lie you get burned.

On a way different level though.
 
#21,269
#21,269
evillawyer said:
No one really knows how detailed the polling data was. Campaigns usually pay a lot for really detailed polling data that allows them to target particular voters. This is not generic CBS/NBC/CNN type polling data. If Manafort gave the Russians this very detailed data it may have allowed the Russians to better target their social media campaigns that aided Trump.
Click to expand...

May have is not provable in court. Based on the information already provided via the releases from mueller, the social media campaigns had little to no effect on the election.

I said mueller, meant Comey.
 
Last edited:
#21,271
#21,271
Fun coupon VOL said:
May have is not provable in court. Based on the information already provided via the releases from mueller, the social media campaigns had little to no effect on the election.
Click to expand...

There is no success requirement. If that were the case attempted murder, robbery, rape etc would all be "very legal, very cool" in the words of our president.
 
#21,272
#21,272
volfanjustin said:
They don't have any idea they just like typing words like "Manafort" "Russia" "Trump" blah blah all together
Click to expand...

I really don’t care either way.

If they acted with Russia to help their cause in the election, lock them up. If not, get off the pot and release the report. The amount of time and money this has taken is ridiculous.
 
#21,273
#21,273
evillawyer said:
There is no success requirement. If that were the case attempted murder, robbery, rape etc would all be "very legal, very cool" in the words of our president.
Click to expand...

Okay. How are you going to prove that it helped them target a certain group?

If there is no success rate requirement then how do you know if it may have help them target a certain group?

If there is no change then it most certainly did not help them target a certain group.
 
#21,274
#21,274
There is one group I would look at to see if their vote changed from the 2012 election to the 2016 election. African Americans.
 
#21,275
#21,275
Fun coupon VOL said:
I really don’t care either way.

If they acted with Russia to help their cause in the election, lock them up. If not, get off the pot and release the report. The amount of time and money this has taken is ridiculous.
Click to expand...
I still don't know how they could have changed the election results especially when we have barry telling us our elections can't be hacked and Comey telling us there wasn't any evidence one vote in any swing state was changed due to alleged Russian interference
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top