csprig9
Go Damn Vols!!!
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2010
- Messages
- 8,113
- Likes
- 17,737
We had more WRs (9)catch passes than 5 of the 10 top 10 passing offenses. the same number as 3 others. Heck LSU only completed passes to like 5 WRs. Arizona only completed to 6 different WRs.I guess you don't watch many games. Looking at just stats is not the same. The only time we really rotate WR's is injuries and blowouts. This season they probably actually rotated WR's more than they ever have. Because they were trying to get Thornton in and then BRU got hurt and the rotations really started. I bet you this if BRu is not hurt Webb/Nimrod never sees the field outside of blowouts. In 2022 there were 39 receptions made in regular season games during blowout time. Most of those went to Squirrel white. Adn the tale was not even close to similar in 2023. We were actually throwing to running backs this year. 2022 we completed 17 passes to rb's. 2023 we completed 46. We spread the ball around a lot more this year because of the issues at WR. Of our top 5 receivers this year only 3 were WR's and number 5 was Chas Nimrod. Bru and Thornton were hurt much of the year and we had nothing else.
View attachment 607155
I honestly think we don't rotate because we can't. If we had the depth I think they will.
I do the same but always put it against the actual game. Sometimes stats can lie if you don't know the context. One stat I haven't been able to reliably find for college football is targets.. I think thats a better stat than just catches. Especially when trying to see where the problem is.That’s all from PFF. Out of curiosity, what stats do you pull now? I’m currently getting most of the data I work with from CFB Data and PFF.
Just a heads up, the data I provided was actually routes run - even more granular than targets. I also didn't include RBs/TEs and limited my analysis to conference games only to avoid the massive rotations you see in the non-con games.I do the same but always put it against the actual game. Sometimes stats can lie if you don't know the context. One stat I haven't been able to reliably find for college football is targets.. I think thats a better stat than just catches. Especially when trying to see where the problem is.
Context
when we were healthy at WR we actually did rotate some (Thornton)
at a certain point, Joe noticed guys were not getting open and dropping balls and started A. running more B hitting rb's more. Jaylen Wright and Dylan Sampson had more catches individually than all RB's in 2022 for UT.
injuries played a huge role in what happened at WR for us this year more so even than last year. How many games did we even have Bru Squirrel, Keyton and Thornton all healthy? It felt like most games at least one was out.
@louder the games you mentioned were all big time games where teams are not gonna take chances. That is not really indicative of the overall offense for the year.
your examples for the playoff teams in playoff games are interesting but I would argue on paper we are deeper than those teams at WR.
Bama outside of Burton im not taking their guys over ours they are super thin at WR depth and are a running team
Texas has Mitchell and Worthy...and neyor gave them 1 catch...statistically the most comparable to UT as far as run/pass
Michigan throws as much to tight ends and rb's as to WR's 133 completions to WR's 117 to TE's and RB's.. they are a running team
Washington is a PAC-12 team....they pass the ball.. period. Would I take their WR squad over ours.. probably
But any of those teams you take their top guy out and it gets rough.... the difference is they didn't have that problem. Their top guys stayed healthy and produced. I don't want us to rotate WR's for the sake of rotating. I want us to have the depth to be able to between series give guys a blow. Because our pace is hard on WR's
the problem with leaving out backs and TE's is it overlooks the offensive scheme. Some offenses target TE's and RB's a lot others not so much. UT for instance was very WR-heavy last year but hit backs and TEs a lot more this year. Other schools like Iowa, Michigan ND target TE's a lot. Just saying context.Just a heads up, the data I provided was actually routes run - even more granular than targets. I also didn't include RBs/TEs and limited my analysis to conference games only to avoid the massive rotations you see in the non-con games.
Re: injuries, all teams deal with that, yet we're still squarely within normal ranges for the conference.
His coaching isn't. They need to step up the focus on the LOS recruiting overall and they're off to a solid start of that in 2025 at least. Will have to wait and see how it pans outWe signed Addison and he could never grab a spot.
He turned Darnell Wright from undrafted into a top 10 pick.
We were tops in rushing. I don't think he's the problem.
NCAA NCAA College Football FBS Stats | NCAA.com gives me the school totals, but I have to either the schools or ESPN to get the individual player total stats I am looking for in one place. I prefer the school, but some of them are difficult to navigate or incomplete so I will use ESPN.That’s all from PFF. Out of curiosity, what stats do you pull now? I’m currently getting most of the data I work with from CFB Data and PFF.
Got it, makes sense! I spend a good bit of my free time building out player/coach analytics for football/basketball, so I've got scripts pulling/transforming stuff from PFF / CFB Data / ESPN / Bart Torvik pretty much daily.NCAA NCAA College Football FBS Stats | NCAA.com gives me the school totals, but I have to either the schools or ESPN to get the individual player total stats I am looking for in one place. I prefer the school, but some of them are difficult to navigate or incomplete so I will use ESPN.
the actual game results I typically just use ESPN, as its much faster than trying to find the schools numbers (even UTs) for an individual player in an individual game beyond the best players.
I then do any math (percentages) myself.
we also have a new OC and QB from last year. even with it still being Heupel's offense there are going to be different tendencies.I do the same but always put it against the actual game. Sometimes stats can lie if you don't know the context. One stat I haven't been able to reliably find for college football is targets.. I think thats a better stat than just catches. Especially when trying to see where the problem is.
Context
when we were healthy at WR we actually did rotate some (Thornton)
at a certain point, Joe noticed guys were not getting open and dropping balls and started A. running more B hitting rb's more. Jaylen Wright and Dylan Sampson had more catches individually than all RB's in 2022 for UT.
injuries played a huge role in what happened at WR for us this year more so even than last year. How many games did we even have Bru Squirrel, Keyton and Thornton all healthy? It felt like most games at least one was out.
@louder the games you mentioned were all big time games where teams are not gonna take chances. That is not really indicative of the overall offense for the year.
your examples for the playoff teams in playoff games are interesting but I would argue on paper we are deeper than those teams at WR.
Bama outside of Burton im not taking their guys over ours they are super thin at WR depth and are a running team
Texas has Mitchell and Worthy...and neyor gave them 1 catch...statistically the most comparable to UT as far as run/pass
Michigan throws as much to tight ends and rb's as to WR's 133 completions to WR's 117 to TE's and RB's.. they are a running team
Washington is a PAC-12 team....they pass the ball.. period. Would I take their WR squad over ours.. probably
But any of those teams you take their top guy out and it gets rough.... the difference is they didn't have that problem. Their top guys stayed healthy and produced. I don't want us to rotate WR's for the sake of rotating. I want us to have the depth to be able to between series give guys a blow. Because our pace is hard on WR's
I think unfortunately that Elarbee needed to prove himself before recruits started believing in him.Yeah this is what’s frustrating
Can’t find anyone capable of being better?