Tucker Carlson Obsession Thread (merged)

#3,377
#3,377
luthervol said:
Did she do something illegal?

…..
What she did was much more justifiable than the way the repubs handled the supreme court nominations over the past few years.
Click to expand...
😂😂😂😂
Man, you can dig yourself a hole faster than anyone else lose on VN. Ever heard of Harry Reid and the Judicial Fillibuster?
The Republicans never would have been able to confirm those three justices IF HARRY REID HADNT IGNORED PRECEDENT TO GAIN SHORT TERM POLITICAL ADVANTAGE .
If I were you I would just stop digging before you embarrass yourself further
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland and SpaceCoastVol
#3,378
#3,378
OrangeTsar said:
😂😂😂😂
Man, you can dig yourself a hole faster than anyone else lose on VN. Ever heard of Harry Reid and the Judicial Fillibuster?
The Republicans never would have been able to confirm those three justices IF HARRY REID HADNT IGNORED PRECEDENT TO GAIN SHORT TERM POLITICAL ADVANTAGE .
If I were you I would just stop digging before you embarrass yourself further
Click to expand...
It's Mitch the Turtles legacy. He warned Dems time and time again not to screw with precedent or he would shove it right up their ass. They ignored it. He did what he said. Now they cry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangeTsar
#3,379
#3,379
OrangeTsar said:
Ah yes, when efficiency in running government becomes more important that multi party democracy. Thanks for confirming my suspicions
View attachment 540591
Click to expand...
She didn't deny repubs a spot. That's total BS
She was willing to accept any five from 180.
The repub leadership fought hard to keep repubs off of the committee. The two willing to serve on the committee were vilified by the repub leadership.

All you witnessed was the results of the republican party's continued efforts to divide.
 
#3,382
#3,382
OrangeTsar said:
😂😂😂😂
Man, you can dig yourself a hole faster than anyone else lose on VN. Ever heard of Harry Reid and the Judicial Fillibuster?
The Republicans never would have been able to confirm those three justices IF HARRY REID HADNT IGNORED PRECEDENT TO GAIN SHORT TERM POLITICAL ADVANTAGE .
If I were you I would just stop digging before you embarrass yourself further
Click to expand...
LOL...How gullible are you?
Reid did what had to be done because of the unprecedented obstruction by the republican minority. It was yet one more result of the republican strategy of unwavering partisanship. At some point wiser people will control the republican party and fences can start to be mended.
 
#3,384
#3,384
luthervol said:
LOL...How gullible are you?
Reid did what had to be done because of the unprecedented obstruction by the republican minority. It was yet one more result of the republican strategy of unwavering partisanship. At some point wiser people will control the republican party and fences can start to be mended.
Click to expand...
Nope. You break precedent, it’s broke. You can’t put toothpaste back in the tube.
And I love the phrase „did what had to be done“. Same thing said by every single dictator in history. You just exposed the true nature of your party in a more eloquent manner than I EVER could.
I thank you for making my job easier with each post you make. Please continue proving my points for me
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland, NurseGoodVol, StarRaider and 2 others
#3,385
#3,385
Just as the move little Harry Reid pulled off came back to bite the Dems going forward, so will this in the future. It is good to know we have his full support when it happens.
 
#3,386
#3,386
NurseGoodVol said:
Luther in all honesty this is why people think you are delusional.

Keep believing the emperor has new clothes.
Click to expand...
Not delusional at all. He is actually being refreshingly honest and candid today. I have never seen him do a better job of exposing the Democrat platform for the authoritarian one Party state drivel that it really is. He is clearly stating the things that Democrats usually prefer to keep under the table. He is saying the quiet parts out loud for all to hear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland, SpaceCoastVol, StarRaider and 1 other person
#3,387
#3,387
OrangeTsar said:
Not delusional at all. He is actually being refreshingly honest and candid today. I have never seen him do a better job of exposing the Democrat platform for the authoritarian one Party state drivel that it really is. He is clearly stating the things that Democrats usually prefer to keep under the table. He is saying the quiet parts out loud for all to hear.
Click to expand...
And I'll say it even more loudly.......

The republican strategy over the past 30+ years of power through division (which culminated in Trumpism) is damaging to the country and some changes to how government functions were inevitable to compensate.

At some point, enough on the right will see the wrongness of the strategy and healing will begin.
 
#3,388
#3,388
luthervol said:
And I'll say it even more loudly.......

The republican strategy over the past 30+ years of power through division (which culminated in Trumpism) is damaging to the country and some changes to how government functions were inevitable to compensate.

At some point, enough on the right will see the wrongness of the strategy and healing will begin.
Click to expand...
No one is more divisive than you people. I have no desire to “heal” and unite with you people
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood, UT_Dutchman and InVOLuntary
#3,391
#3,391
luthervol said:
And I'll say it even more loudly.......

The republican strategy over the past 30+ years of power through division (which culminated in Trumpism) is damaging to the country and some changes to how government functions were inevitable to compensate.

At some point, enough on the right will see the wrongness of the strategy and healing will begin.
Click to expand...
Once again, what gives YOU the right to make that call? What gives YOUR PARTY the right to make that call?
Do you want democracy or dictatorship ? Based on your posts so far, I think I can reasonably guess the answer
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol, allvol123, StarRaider and 2 others
#3,393
#3,393
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Those 3 of 5 chosen had to go along w/Pelosi & the Democrats lunatic one-sided agenda. Pelosi didn't want any kind of repubs opposite opinions/thoughts brought to the committee.
Click to expand...

Yep. Facts there are something that the Democrats are not fond of. They'd rather have a Banana Republic type Court
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood, OrangeBoro and OrangeTsar
#3,396
#3,396
OrangeTsar said:
Once again, what gives YOU the right to make that call? What gives YOUR PARTY the right to make that call?
Do you want democracy or dictatorship ? Based on your posts so far, I think I can reasonably guess the answer
Click to expand...
To make what call?

Did she break some kind of law? The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced it should have been done long ago.
 
#3,397
#3,397
NurseGoodVol said:
I’m not deluded by the whole of the government and how badly they have harmed Americans.
Click to expand...
Many things have harmed Americans, many things of helped Americans, and many things have done some of both.
Government and the media are two that belong in that last category.
 
#3,398
#3,398
luthervol said:
To make what call?

Did she break some kind of law? The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced it should have been done long ago.
Click to expand...
To make the call that the other party is being unreasonably decisive and that the only way to restore „efficient government“ is to silence the opposition or at least limit who is and is not allowed to speak from that party.
Who are you to think you have that right. Or Pelosi to have that right?
 
#3,399
#3,399
OrangeTsar said:
To make the call that the other party is being unreasonably decisive and that the only way to restore „efficient government“ is to silence the opposition or at least limit who is and is not allowed to speak from that party.
Who are you to think you have that right. Or Pelosi to have that right?
Click to expand...
It would be unconstitutional if the founders thought she shouldn't have that right. I'm just following the lead of the constitution.
Isn't that what you guys act like should be the guide?
 
#3,400
#3,400
luthervol said:
It would be unconstitutional if the founders thought she shouldn't have that right. I'm just following the lead of the constitution.
Isn't that what you guys act like should be the guide?
Click to expand...
The Constitution give the house broad latitude to set its own rules. That doesn’t mean that the Speaker SHOULD choose to abuse those rules to run the House like a dictatorship. Once the majority has demonstrated its comfort in silencing the minority, it no longer functions in a healthy manner. You are on the road the one Party rule.
Tell you what, how about if we Republicans just decide to have zero Democrats on any committee? We wouldn’t be breaking any law or violating the terms of the constitution. And it would cure divisive argument in the legislature and allow lots of efficiency in passing needed legislation?
You would squeal like a stuck pig (and rightfully so).
You don’t want to admit it; but the only thing standing between a democratically ran Constitutional Republic and a one party dictatorship is the Republican Majority in the House of Representatives. Your side has shown it’s true colours and they are frightening beyond belief.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top